Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:51:30.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Accountability, Legislator Gender, and the Status Quo Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2019

Lior Sheffer Open the ORCID record for Lior Sheffer [Opens in a new window]
Lior Sheffer*
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large body of literature in political science documents differences between elected men and women in their substantive policy preferences, representation styles, and effectiveness as legislators. We know far less about whether female and male representatives respond differently to being held politically accountable for their decisions. Although it is a difficult concept to evaluate empirically with incumbents, this absence of research is nevertheless surprising considering the central role of accountability in legislative behavior and the nonelite evidence that women and men respond differently to attributions of accountability. I provide evidence for the existence of such an accountability gender gap in an experiment with 377 incumbent legislators in three countries, in which they were asked to choose between economic policy plans alternately presented as the status quo, with varying levels of implied task accountability. Elected women and men reacted significantly differently when the political accountability levels of the task increased: female politicians exhibited a stronger preference for policies presented as the status quo, whereas male politicians were more likely to abandon the status quo and favor change. This pattern is unique to politicians and is not observed in nonelites. I discuss processes that motivate this divergence and the implications for research on gender and political representation.

Keywords

accountabilitygenderstatus quoexperimentelite behaviordecision making
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 365 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alan, Sule, Ertac, Seda, Kubilay, Elif, and Loranth, Gyongyi. 2016. “Understanding Gender Differences in Leadership.” Centre for Economic Policy Research discussion paper no. DP11596.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1988. Macroeconomics and Politics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 3:13–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 2003. “The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (1): 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Christopher J. 2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science 10:271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, James, and Vesterlund, Lise. 2001. “Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragonès, Enriqueta, Postlewaite, Andrew, and Palfrey, Thomas. 2007. “Political Reputations and Campaign Promises.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (4): 846–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, John. 2004. “Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-analytic Review.” Review of General Psychology 8 (4): 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. D. 1992. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15:183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole. 2014. “Gendered Incentives for Legislative Compromise.” PhD thesis, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole 2015a. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36 (6): 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole. 2015b. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, & Identities 3 (1): 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole. 2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38 (2): 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M., Harbridge, Laurel, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2017. “Who is Punished? How Voters Evaluate Male and Female Legislators Who Do Not Compromise.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Linda L. M., and Bennett, Stephen E. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Quarterly 17 (1): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, Angela L. 2011. “Out of Control: Delegates’ Information Sources and Perceptions of Female Candidates.” Political Communication 28 (1): 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Mark. 2007. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal, 13(4):447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandts, Jordi, and Garofalo, Orsola. 2012. “Gender Pairings and Accountability Effects.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (1): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, and Siverson, Randolph M. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 841–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, E. M., and Lodge, Martin. 2016. “The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability.” Governance 29 (2): 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, James P., Miller, David C., and Schafer, William D. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (3): 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Hongbin, Treisman, Daniel, Gordon, R., Gibson, C., Gimpelson, V., and Gilman, M. 2009. “Political Decentralization and Policy Experimentation.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammisa, Anne Marie, and Reingold, Beth. 2004. “Women in State Legislatures and State Legislative Research: Beyond Sameness and Difference.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (2): 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelos, Tereza. 2005. “Shield or Stinger: The Role of Party Bonds and Competence Evaluations in Political Predicaments.” Technical Report, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R. 2017. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R. 2018. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 US Presidential Race.” Political Psychology.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2008. Women and British Party Politics: Descriptive, Substantive and Symbolic Representation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, Robinson, Amanda Lea, Johnson, Martha C., and Muriaas, Ragnhild. 2019. “(How) Do Voters Discriminate Against Women Candidates? Experimental and Qualitative Evidence From Malawi.” Comparative Political Studies. doi: 10.1177/0010414019858960.Google Scholar
Coffée, Hilde, and Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5–6): 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, Christian S., Eidelman, Scott, Skitka, Linda J., and Morgan, G. S. 2009. “Status Quo Framing Increases Support for Torture.” Social Influence 4 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, Rebecca E., and Little, Thomas H. 1999. “Getting to the Top: Factors Influencing the Selection of Women to Positions of Leadership in State Legislatures.” State & Local Government Review 31 (2): 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly, Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Carroll, Susan J. 2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen's Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, D. M. 1994. “Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War.” American Journal of Political Science 38:362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazen, Allan. 2000. “The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15:75–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2012. “Experimenting with Politics.” Science 335 (6073): 1177–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, Alice H., and Johnson, Blair T. 1990. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (2): 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Mark C., and Whistler, Donald E. 2001. “Explaining State Legislators’ Casework and Public Resource Allocations.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz, Dolezal, Martin, and Mueller, Wolfgang C. 2017. “Gender Differences in Negative Campaigning: The Impact of Party Environments.” Politics & Gender 13 (1): 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esarey, Justin, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2018. “Womens Representation, Accountability and Corruption in Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 659–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, Alan. 1994. “Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 116 (3): 429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fennema, M. G., and Perkins, Jon D. 2008. “Mental Budgeting Versus Marginal Decision Making: Training, Experience and Justification Effects on Decisions Involving Sunk Costs.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21 (3): 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Raquel, and Rodrik, Dani. 1991. “Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 81:1146–1155.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J. 2014. “How the Gender of US Senators Influences Peoples Understanding and Engagement in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (4): 1017–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Qiang, and Li, Ming. 2014. “Reputation-Concerned Policy Makers and Institutional Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Public Economics 110:15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette M. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, Niederle, Muriel, and Rustichini, Aldo. 2003. “Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 1049–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Ann, Shafie, David M., and Crigler, Ann N. 2003. “Is Negative Advertising Effective for female candidates? An experiment in Voters’ Uses of Gender Stereotypes.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8 (3): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grolleau, Gilles, Kocher, Martin G., and Sutan, Angela. 2016. “Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?” Management Science 62 (12): 3428–3438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2013. “Risk and Roll Calls: How Legislators’ Personal Finances Shape Congressional Decisions.” USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS13-7, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hughes, D. A., and Victor, David G. 2013. “The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making.” Perspectives on Politics 11(2): 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer L. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. New YCambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16:285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2008. “Sex and the Statehouse: The Effects of Gender on Legislative Roll-Call Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (4): 955–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhmann, Daniel. 2019. “When Do Female MPs Represent Womens’ Interests? Electoral Systems and the Legislative Behavior of Women.” Political Research Quarterly doi: 10.1177/1065912919859437.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (3): 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Mark, and Stolle, Dietlind. 2004. “Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere: Gender Differences in Anticipated Political Participation Among American Fourteen-Year-Olds.” Women & Politics 26 (3–4): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, Peter, and Wintrobe, Ronald. 1995. “The Political Economy of Inaction.” Journal of Public Economics 56 (3): 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Cassese, Erin, and Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2008. “Gender, Public Opinion, and Political Reasoning.” Political Women & American Democracy doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790621.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Stefanie K., Murphy, Susan Elaine, Zewdie, Selamawit, and Reichard, Rebecca J. 2008. “The Strong, Sensitive Type: Effects of Gender Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes on the Evaluation of Male and Female Leaders.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 106 (1): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R. 2005. “A Model of Choice for Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Nosek, Brian A. 2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology 25 (6): 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H. 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn, 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Stefan, and Méndez, Fabio. 2005. “Policy Makers’ Preferences, Party Ideology, and the Political Business Cycle.” Southern Economic Journal 71 (4): 752–767.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Bauer, Nichole M. 2014. “The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36 (1): 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Jerey, and Steigerwalt, Army. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability: How Women Work Harder to Stay in Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Mathieu, and Vieider, Ferdinand M. 2013. “Reining in Excessive Risk-Taking by Executives: The Effect of Accountability.” Theory & Decision 75 (4): 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, Thomas H., Dunn, Dana, and Deen, Rebecca E. 2001. “A View from the Top: Gender Differences in Legislative Priorities Among State Legislative Leaders.” Women & Politics 22 (4): 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster Women: the Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, Sandra, Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde, and Thoma, Carmen. 2017. “Do Women Have More Shame Than Men? An Experiment on Self-Assessment and the Shame of Overestimating Oneself.” European Economic Review 92:31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumdar, Sumon, and Mukand, Sharun W. 2004. “Policy Gambles.” The American Economic Review 94 (4): 1207–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1995. Democratic Governance. Mankato, MN: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeery J., and Anderson, Mary R. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination Of Genderbased Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Diana Z. 2015. “Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1022–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Johan P. 2015. “Democratic Order, Autonomy, and Accountability.” Governance 28 (4): 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Yoshikuni, and Yamada, Masahiro. 2016. “Do Voters Prefer Gender Stereotypic Candidates? Evidence from a Conjoint Survey Experiment in Japan.” Political Science Research & Methods doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2772966.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tracy L. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, David, and Smith, Jessi L. 2008. “Subtle Sexism? Examining Vote Preferences When Women Run Against Men for the Presidency.” Journal of Women, Politics, & Policy 29 (4): 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Elevating Womens Voices in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, Melo, Marcus Andr, and Figueiredo, Carlos Mauricio 2009. “The Corruption-Enhancing Role of Re-election Incentives? Counterintuitive Evidence from Brazils Audit Reports.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, volume 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. “Thinking About Making a Difference.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quattrone, George A., and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82 (3): 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, Adam, Klingler, Jonathan, and Hollibaugh, Gary E. 2015. “Talking Heads: Measuring Elite Personality Using Speech.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid = 2605644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2003. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, by Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldex, Lisa, 128–147. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Lilliard E. Jr., and Freeman, Patricia K. 1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service Among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinehart, Sue T. 2013. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Samuelson, William, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 1 (1): 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, A. L. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Corbetta, Renato. 2004. “Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the US House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffer, Lior, and Loewen, Peter. 2017. “Electoral Confidence, Overconfidence, and Risky Behavior: Evidence from a Study with Elected Politicians.” Political Behavior 41(1) doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9438-0.Google Scholar
Sheffer, Lior, Loewen, Peter, Walgrave, Stefaan, Soroka, Stuart, and Shaefer, Tamir. 2018. “Non-representative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians.” American Political Science Review 1122:302–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, Levin, Shana, Liu, James, and Pratto, Felicia. 2000. “Social Dominance Orientation, Antiegalitarianism and the Political Psychology of Gender: An Extension and Cross-Cultural Replication.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (1): 41–67.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, Itamar, and Nye, Peter. 1992. “The Effect of Accountability on Susceptibility to Decision Errors.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 51 (3): 416–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Boettger, Richard. 1994. “Accountability Amplifies the Status Quo Effect When Change Creates Victims.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, Carmen. 2016. “Under-Versus Overconfidence: An Experiment on How Others Perceive a Biased Self-Assessment.” Experimental Economics 19 (1): 218–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle, and Sanders, Bailey. 2017. “Legislator Gender, Constituency Service, and Representational Tradeoffs.” Paper presented at the 2017 Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2012. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, Linda. 2006. “When Do Women Count? Substantive Representation of Women in Canadian Legislatures.” In Representing Women in Parliament, eds. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda, 142–155. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Deth, Jan W. 2000. “Political Interest and Apathy: The Decline of a Gender Gap?” Acta Politica 35 (2): 247–274.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay L. 1997. “Knowing and Caring About Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E. 2018. “Womens’ Issues and Their Fates in the US Congress.” Political Science Research & Methods 6 (4): 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vraga, Emily K. 2017. “Which Candidates Can Be Mavericks? The Effects of Issue Disagreement and Gender on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics & Policy 45 (1): 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, Lois D. 2010. Voting the Gender Gap. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. 2008. Political Women and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Wendy, and Eagly, Alice H. 2002. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (5): 699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Sheffer supplementary material

Sheffer supplementary material

Download Sheffer supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 167 KB