Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:32:43.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Looking for Gender in Women's Campaigns for National Office in 2004 and Beyond: In What Ways Is Gender Still a Factor?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2006

Barbara Burrell
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University

Extract

In 2004, 39 individuals were newly elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Eight of these individuals were women. Women went on to win two special elections held in 2005, while a man won the third contest. This increase in the numerical representation of women in the lower house of Congress in 2004–5 was a positive counter to the lack of progress women made in advancing their numbers in other elective offices, such as the U.S. Senate, governorships, and state legislatures in 2004. These gains in representation, however, only amounted to a 15.5% membership for women in the U.S. House of Representatives. Who were these successful women, and what does their election suggest to us about women and political officeholding and about gender as a factor when men and women run for public office in the early years of the twenty-first century? Do their campaigns and election reflect the continued relevance of gender, or are they indications of the demise of gender as a factor in elections?

Type
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barone, M., G. Ujifusa, and D. Matthews. 2004. “13th District, Pennsylvania.” In Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal, 1457.
Biersack, Robert, and Paul Herrnson. 1994. “Political Parties and the Year of the Woman.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths & Realities, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 16180.
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Burrell, Barbara. 1998. “Campaign Finance: Women's Experience in the Modern Era.” In Women in Elected Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burrell, Barbara. 2006. “Political Parties and Women's Organizations: Resources Bases for Women Candidates?” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bystrom, Dianne G., Mary Christine Banwart, Lynda Lee Kaid, and Terry A. Robertson. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication. New York: Routledge.
Bystrom, Dianne, and Lynda Lee Kaid. 2002. “Are Women Candidates Transforming Campaign Communication? A Comparison of Advertising Videostyles in the 1990s.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 14669.
Dabelko, Kirsten la Cour, and Paul Herrnson. 1997. “Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (March): 12135.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Gertzog, Irwin. 1995. Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration and Behavior. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jones, Jeffrey M. 2005. “Nearly Half of Americans Think U.S. Will Soon Have a Woman President.” Gallup News Service, October 4.
Jones, Jeffrey M., and David W. Moore. 2003. “Generational Differences in Support for a Woman President.” Gallup Poll Report, June 17.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post–September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (September): 47990.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.