Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:37:11.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Terrorism activates ethnocentrism to explain greater willingness to sacrifice civil liberties: evidence from Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2022

Christina Novak Hansen*
Affiliation:
ESCP Europe Business School Berlin, Berlin Campus, Heubnerweg 8-10, DE-14059 Berlin, Germany
Peter Thisted Dinesen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University College London, 29-31 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9QU, United Kingdom Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cnovakhansen@escp.eu

Abstract

Research from the United States has shown that the 9/11 terrorist attacks activated individuals’ ethnocentric predispositions to structure public opinion toward several political and social issues. Beyond this overall finding, several aspects of the activation hypothesis remain unexplored, including its geographical and substantive scope. Using the quasi-random timing of terrorist attacks during the collection of the 2016 GGSS, we demonstrate the terrorism-induced activation of ethnocentrism in Germany. Specifically, a cascade of terrorist attacks involving immigrants in the summer of 2016 activated ethnocentrism among native Germans to predict (lower) support for civil liberties relative to security concerns after its influence had been absent just a month before. Further, we show that the activation of ethnocentrism holds up in a series of robustness checks and is not explained by alternative factors, including other predispositions.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAMF (2016) “Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2015.” Bundesamt Für Migration Und Flüchtlinge. Available at https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Statistik/BundesamtinZahlen/bundesamt-in-zahlen-2015.html?nn=284738 (accessed 28.01.2021).Google Scholar
Bauernschuster, S, Diekmann, A, Hadjar, A, Kurz, K, Rosar, U, Wagner, U and Westle, B (2017) Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften ALLBUS 2016. Köln: GESIS Datenarchiv. Available at https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA5250 (accessed January 4, 2019).Google Scholar
Bizumic, B (2019) Ethnocentrism: Integrated Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bizumic, B and Duckitt, J (2012) What is and is not ethnocentrism? A conceptual analysis and political implications. Political Psychology 33, 887909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizumic, B, Duckitt, J, Popadic, D, Dru, V and Krauss, S (2009) A cross-cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism. European Journal of Social Psychology 39, 871899.Google Scholar
Claassen, C and McLaren, L (2021) Do threats galvanize authoritarians or mobilize nonauthoritarians? Experimental tests from 19 European societies. Political Psychology 42, 677694.Google Scholar
Feldman, S and Stenner, K (1997) Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology 18, 741770.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H and Listhaug, O (2013) It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe. Public Choice 156, 213228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, MJ and Suhay, E (2011) Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science 55, 546560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, CD and Kinder, DR (2007) Terror and ethnocentrism: foundation of American support for the war on terrorism. Journal of Politics 69, 320338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, CD and Kinder, DR (2012) Ethnocentrism as a short-term force in the 2008 American presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 56, 326340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, DR and Kam, CD (2010) Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kleinpenning, G and Hagendoorn, L (1993) Forms of racism and the cumulative dimension of ethnic attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly 56, 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, JA and Kinder, DR (1990) Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review 84, 497512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legewie, J (2013) Terrorist events and attitudes toward immigrants: a natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology 118, 11991245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, J, Falcó-Gimeno, A and Hernández, E (2020) Unexpected event during survey design: promise and pitfalls for causal inference. Political Analysis 28, 186–206.Google Scholar
Rapp, C (2016) Is it all the same? Forms of racial prejudice, their origins and consequences reconsidered. Working paper. Available at https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/about/conference/RAPP_Is-It-All-the-Same.pdf (accessed 28.01.2021).Google Scholar
Silver, BD and Davis, DW (2004) Civil liberties vs. security: public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science 48, 2846.Google Scholar
Sniderman, PM, Petersen, MB, Slothuus, R, Stubager, R and Petrov, P (2019) Reactions to terror attacks: a heuristic model. Political Psychology 40, 245258.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hansen and Dinesen Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Hansen and Dinesen supplementary material

Hansen and Dinesen supplementary material

Download Hansen and Dinesen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 994.6 KB