Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-zvgck Total loading time: 0.296 Render date: 2021-06-23T01:05:54.013Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Counterbalancing, Spatial Dependence, and Peer Group Effects*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Abstract

Previous studies identified several domestic factors that may influence a country’s level of structural coup-proofing, i.e., counterbalancing strategies that shall prevent internal groups from seizing power via a coup d’état. We suggest that a country’s level of counterbalancing is also affected by such policies in what we term countries’ “peer groups.” When deciding the appropriate level of counterbalancing, rulers may be affected by external information flows from a “peer group” with similar structural coup-risk characteristics (institutions) or a similar coup-risk experience (coup history). Using maximum likelihood spatial lag models and data in 1976–2005, we find that leaders learn from and emulate counterbalancing in other states, but rather only through an “experiential peer group.”

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Tobias Böhmelt is a Reader in the Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK, and Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. Andrea Ruggeri is an Associate Professor at Brasenose College, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford. Ulrich Pilster is a Research Fellow of the Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK. We thank Jacqueline H.R. DeMeritt and Ursula Daxecker for useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We are also grateful to the journal’s editor, Vera Troeger, and the anonymous reviewers for their numerous suggestions that helped to improve the article. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.55

References

Baumeister, Roy, Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkeuer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen D.. 2001. ‘Bad is Stronger than Good’. Review of General Psychology 5(4):323370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Beardsley, Kyle. 2006. ‘Space is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy’. International Studies Quarterly 50(1):2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkin, Aaron. 2005. United we Stand: Divide-and-Conquer Politics and the Logic of International Hostility. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Belkin, Aaron, and Schofer, Evan. 2003. ‘Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5):594620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkin, Aaron, and Schofer, Evan. 2005. ‘Coup Risk, Counterbalancing, and International Conflict’. Security Studies 14(1):140177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1991. ‘Review Article: What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?’. British Journal of Political Science 21(2):215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhmelt, Tobias, and Pilster, Ulrich. 2015. ‘The Impact of Institutional Coup-Proofing on Coup Attempts and Coup Outcomes’. International Interactions 41(1):158182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Alex. 2005. ‘Location, Location, Location … Identifying Hot Spots of International Conflict’. International Interactions 31(3):251273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Dietmar, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2006. ‘Taking “Galton’s Problem” Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3):298322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James. 2004. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2008. ‘Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space’. International Studies Quarterly 52(2):215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. ‘State Repression and Political Order’. Annual Review of Political Science 10(1):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desch, Michael. 1999. Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2007. ‘The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?’. Annual Review of Sociology 33(1):449472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, David, and Marsh, David. 2000. ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making’. Governance 13(1):524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhorst, Paul. 2003. ‘Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models’. International Regional Science Review 26(3):244268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachery, and Simmons, Beth. 2005. ‘On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1):3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, and Laitin, David. 2003. ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’. American Political Science Review 97(1):7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feaver, Peter. 1992. ‘Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations’. International Security 17(3):160187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Samuel. 1988. The Man on the Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert, and Hays, Jude. 2007. ‘Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data’. Political Analysis 15(2):140164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, Robert, and Hays, Jude. 2008. ‘Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance’. Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5):742780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Douglas, and Kariv, Shachar. 2003. Bayesian Learning in Social Networks. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. ‘Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?’. American Journal of Political Science 54(3):650666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2012. ‘Transnational Diffusion: Norms, Ideas, and Policies’. In Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. 453477. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Ward, Michael. 2006. ‘Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization’. International Organization 60(4):911933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur A. 2001. ‘Risk, Rule, and Reason: Leadership in Africa’. Public Administration and Development 21(2):7787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, David. 1980. ‘Civilian Control of the Military in Black Africa’. African Affairs 80(318):4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude, Kachi, Aya, and Franzese, Robert. 2010. ‘A Spatial Model Incorporating Dynamic, Endogenous, Network Interdependence: A Political Science Application’. Statistical Methodology 7(3):406428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzinger, Katharina, and Knill, Christoph. 2005. ‘Causes and Conditions of Cross-National Convergence’. Journal of European Public Policy 12(5):775796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowitz, Morris. 1977. Military Institutions and Coercion in the Developing Nations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Kposowa, Augustine. 1992. ‘The Political Origins of African Military Coups: Ethnic Competition, Military Centrality, and the Struggle Over the Postcolonial State’. International Studies Quarterly 36(3):271291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’. Econometrica 47(2):263291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos (eds) 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebschull, Harvey G. 1994. ‘Operation “Just Missed:” Lessons from Failed Coup Attempts’. Armed Forces & Society 20(4):565579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. ‘Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’. Comparative Political Studies 12(1):327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chang Kil, and Strang, David. 2006. ‘The International Diffusion of Public Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning’. International Organization 60(4):883909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward. 1969. Coup D’Etat: A Practical Handbook. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Jaggers, Keith. 2013. POLITY IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset User’s Manual . College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Fowler, James H., and Smirnov, Oleg. 2008. ‘On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences’. Journal of Politics 70(2):335350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Patrick J. 2006. ‘Coups and Conflict in West Africa, 1955–2004. Part II, Empirical Findings’. Armed Forces & Society 32(2):234253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert King (ed.) 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2005. ‘Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1):6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, Benjamin, and Starr, Harvey. 1990. ‘Theoretical and Logical Issues in the Study of International Diffusion’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(4):391412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric, Plümper, Thomas, and Epifanio, Mariaelisa. 2014. ‘The “Peer Effect” in Counterterrorist Policies’. International Organization 68(1):211234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilster, Ulrich, and Böhmelt, Tobias. 2011. ‘Coup-Proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28(4):331350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilster, Ulrich, and Böhmelt, Tobias. 2012. ‘Do Democracies Engage Less in Coup-Proofing? On the Relationship Between Regime Type and Civil-Military Relations’. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(4):355372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilster, Ulrich, Böhmelt, Tobias, and Tago, Atsushi. 2014. ‘The Differentiation of Security Forces and the Onset of Genocidal Violence’. Armed Forces & Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Neumayer, Eric. 2010. ‘Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence’. European Journal of Political Research 49(3):418442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Troeger, Vera. 2007. ‘Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects’. Political Analysis 15(2):124139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera, and Manow, Philip. 2005. ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics’. European Journal of Political Research 44(2):327354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jonathan, and Thyne, Clayton. 2011. ‘Global Instances of Coups from 19502010: A New Dataset’. Journal of Peace Research 48(2):249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlivan, James. 1999. ‘Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East’. International Security 24(2):131165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Philip. 2011. ‘The Enemy Within: Personal Rule, Coups, and Civil War in Africa’. World Politics 63(2):300346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid, and Wayman, Frank. 2010. Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, and Garret, Geoffrey. 2006. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60(4):781810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, Randolph, and Starr, Harvey. 1990. The Diffusion of War. Anna Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Souaré, Issaka K. 2014. ‘The African Union as a Norm Entrepreneur on Military Coups d’état in Africa (1952–2012): An Empirical Assessment’. Journal of Modern African Studies 52(1):6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniland, Paul. 2008. ‘Explaining Civil-Military Relations in Complex Political Environments: India and Pakistan in Comparative Perspective’. Security Studies 17(2):322362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinnett, Douglas, Tir, Jaroslav, Schafer, Philip, Diehl, Paul, and Gochman, Charles. 2002. ‘The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 19(2):5866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David. 1991. ‘Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models: An Event History Framework’. Sociological Methods and Research 19(3):324353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Te-Yu. 1998. ‘Arms Transfers and Coups d’État: A Study on Sub-Saharan Africa’. Journal of Peace Research 35(6):659675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Hugh, and Cao, Xun. 2012. ‘Domestic and International Influences on Green Taxation’. Comparative Political Studies 45(9):10751103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Michael, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2008. Spatial Regression Models. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Claude Emerson. 1976. Civilian Control of the Military: Theory and Cases from Developing Countries. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Böhmelt supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Böhmelt supplementary material(File)
File 97 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Böhmelt supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Böhmelt supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 209 KB
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Counterbalancing, Spatial Dependence, and Peer Group Effects*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Counterbalancing, Spatial Dependence, and Peer Group Effects*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Counterbalancing, Spatial Dependence, and Peer Group Effects*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *