Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:53:19.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The selection of cooling fluids for internal combustion engines operating at low temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. S. Sellers
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cambridge.

Extract

Internal combustion engines, in common with all heat engines, derive their capacity for work from a cycle of operations which comprises the supply of heat at a high temperature followed by the rejection of heat at a much lower temperature. The difference between the two quantities of heat represents the maximum amount of energy which can be converted into useful work. In the familiar piston-type internal combustion engine, the heat supply is maintained by burning a suitable fuel in air, and heat is rejected largely in the exhaust gases. With heat engines in general, it is true that the higher the temperature of the heat supply, the greater the efficiency of the engine. There are, however, limitations to the temperature at which an engine can operate. These are imposed by the properties of the materials used in its construction, and by the necessity of maintaining satisfactory lubrication in all circumstances.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Automatic Antifreezes, Washington, National Bureau of Standards, 1952. (N.B.S. circular 506.)Google Scholar
2Marc, Darrin. Chromate corrosion inhibitors in bimetallic systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 8, 1945, p. 741–49.Google Scholar
3Olsen, J. C., Brunjes, Austin S.and Olsen, J. W.Freezing and flow points for glycerol, prestone, de-natured alcohol, and methanol. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 22, No. 12, 1930, p. 1315–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Yant, W. P., Schrenk, H. H.and Sayehs, R. R.Methanol antifreeze and methanol poisoning. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1931, p. 551–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Polar Record, Vol. 6, No. 46, 1953, p. 7587.Google Scholar
6 Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd., private communication.Google Scholar
7Wormall, F., Mercer, A. D.and ISEN, H. C. K.Journal of Applied Chemistry (London), Vol. 3, No. 1, 1953, p. 22 and Vol. 3, No. 3, 1953, p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar