Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:07:33.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arctic and sub-Arctic soil emissions: possible implications for global climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Torben Christensen
Torben Christensen
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, Cambridge CB2 1ER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Climate models predict a substantial warming at high latitudes following the enhanced greenhouse effect caused by anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and various other trace gases. Arctic and sub-Arctic soils contain large amounts of organic carbon that could be made increasingly available for decomposition in a wanner climate due to deepening of the biologically-active layer and increased thermokarst erosion. This produces the potential for increased emissions of CO2 and CH4 from tundra areas and thus positive (enhancing) feedback effects on the greenhouse effect. From being a net absorber of CO2 the global tundra areas could become a net source of up to 1.25 Gt C yr1 as a result of the predicted warmer and dryer conditions during the thaw period. CH4 is at least 21 times more effective as a greenhouse gas than CO2. How the CH4 balance in the tundra will respond to climate change is therefore very important but also much less certain. Estimates of total present CH4 emissions from northern wetlands vary greatly, ranging from 2.4 to 106 Tg CH4 yr1 and little is known about the mechanisms controlling the flux. There are indications, however, that if the tundra becomes wetter under warming, CH4 emissions would probably increase. If it becomes dryer, the emissions could cease or even turn the tundra into a sink for atmospheric CH4, partly due to increasing microbial consumption of CH4 in the soil. There is an urgent need for more research into the processes controlling the CH4 flux in Arctic and sub-Arctic soils.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 27 , Issue 162 , July 1991 , pp. 205 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aselmann, I and Crutzen, P. J. 1989. Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emission. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 8: 307–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, W. D., Luken, J. O., Mortensen, D. A. and Peterson, K. M. 1982. Arctic tundra: a source or sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in a changing environment. Oecologia 53: 7–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billings, W. D., Luken, J. O., Mortensen, D. A. and Peterson, K. M. 1983. Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: possible effects on arctic tundra. Oecologia 58: 286–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billings, W. D. 1987. Carbon balance of Alaskan tundra and taiga ecosystems: past, present and future. Quaternary Science Reviews 6: 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grill, P. M., Bartlett, K. B., Harriss, R. C, Gorham, E., Verry, E. S., Sebacher, D. I., Madzar, L and Sanner, W. 1988. Methane flux from Minnesota peatlands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2 (4): 371–84.Google Scholar
Grulke, N. E., Riechers, G. H., Oechel, W. C, Hjelm, U and Jaeger, C. 1990. Carbon balance in tussock tundra under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 Oecologia 83: 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC. 1990. Climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Scientific Assessment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1990. Regulation by light of methane emissions from a wetland. Nature. 345 (6275): 513–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, G. W., Kipphut, G. W. and Miller, M. C. 1991. Arctic lakes and streams as gas conduits to the atmosphere: implications for tundra carbon budgets. Science 251: 298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashof, D. A. 1989. The dynamic greenhouse: feedback processes that may influence future concentrations of atmospheric trace gases and climate change. Climatic Change 4: 213–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, E. and Fung, I. 1987. Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1 (1): 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. R. and Knowles, R. 1987. Methane and carbon dioxide evolution from subarctic fens. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 67: 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T.R. and Knowles, R. 1989. The influence of water table levels on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from peatland soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 69: 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T., Roulet, N. and Knowles, R. 1990. Spatial and temporal variations of methane flux from subarctic/northern boreal fens. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 4 (1): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oremland, R. S. 1988. Biogeochemistryof methanogenic bacteria. In: Zehnder, A. J. B. (editor). Biology of anaerobic microorganisms New York, Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ovenden, L 1990. Peat accumulation in northern wetlands. Quaternary Research. 33: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, K. M., Billings, W. D. and Reynolds, D. N. 1984. Influence of water table and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on the carbon balance of arctic tundra. Arctic and Alpine Research 16: 331–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, W. M. (editor). 1990. Report of a workshop on climate feedback and the role of peatlands, tundra and boreal ecosystems in the global carbon cycle. Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Publication No. 3289.Google Scholar
Roulet, N., Moore, T. and Lafleur, P. 1990. Northern fens, CH4 flux and climate change. Unpublished manuscript in author's possession.Google Scholar
Sebacher, D. I., Harris, R. C, Bartlett, K. B., Sebacher, S. M. and Grice, S. S. 1986. Atmospheric methane sources: Alaskan tundra bogs, an alpine fen, and a subarctic boreal marsh. Tellus 38B (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. 1990. The significance of climatic change for the permafrost environment. Northern Engineer 22 (1): 21–26.Google Scholar
Steudler, P. A., Bowden, R. D., Mellillo, J. M. and Aber, J. D. 1989. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on methane uptake in temperate forest soils. Nature 341: 314–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, B. H. 1976. Methane production in tundra peat. In: Schlegel, H. G., Gottschalk, G. and Pfennig, N. (editors). Microbial production and utilization of gases (H2′ CH4′, CO). Göttingen, E. Goltze KG.Google Scholar
Svensson, B. H. and Rosswall, T. 1984. In situ methane production from acid peat in plant communities with different moisture regimes in asubarctic mire. Oikos 43: 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, B. H. 1986. Methane as part of the carbon mineralization in an acid tundra mire. In: F, Megusar. and (editors). Perspectives in microbial ecology. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on microbial ecology. Ljubljana, Slovene Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
Vaghjiani, G. L. and Ravishankara, A. R. 1991. New measurement of the rate coefficient for the reaction of OH with methane. Nature 350: 406–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, S. C. and Reeburgh, W. S. 1988. A methane flux time series for tundra environments. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2 (4): 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, S. C. and Reeburgh, W. S. 1990a. A methane flux transect along the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road. Tellus 42B: 237–49.Google Scholar
Whalen, S. C. and Reeburgh, W. S. 1990b. Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils. Nature 346: 160–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar