Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T07:59:14.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Does the Comparative Do for Cosmopolitanism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

César Domínguez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A conventional definition of cosmopolitanism stresses

relationships to a plurality of cultures understood as distinctive entities. (And the more the better; cosmopolitans should ideally be foxes rather than hedgehogs.) But furthermore cosmopolitanism in a stricter sense includes a stance toward diversity itself, toward the coexistence of cultures in the individual experience…. It is an intellectual and aesthetic stance of openness toward divergent cultural experiences. (Hannerz 239)

In the foundation of comparative literature as a distinctive discipline, cosmopolitanism was valued for its “exoticism”—namely, the feeling of being “a citizen ‘of every nation,’ not to belong to one's ‘native country’” (Texte 79), which in (French) literature translated as the openness toward other (northern European) literatures (xi).

Defining cosmopolitanism in relation to national loyalties, multilingualism, and mobility overlooks the fact that the cosmopolitan is much older than the nation and that not all multilingual abilities and mobilities are accepted as cosmopolitan, especially when they lack “sophistication.” Since I have partially discussed these issues elsewhere, I will not pursue them here but will restrict myself to Hannah Arendt's future-oriented concept of cosmopolitanism as global citizenship. My aim is to stress the elitism in many theories of cosmopolitanism and to show how comparative literature can challenge this elitism by looking at “hidden traditions.” To do so, I will draw on two essays by Arendt—“The Jew as Pariah: A Hidden Tradition” and “Karl Jaspers: Citizen of the World?” As for the first essay, I will introduce Gypsy next to Jew, the latter being Arendt's exclusive interest despite the implications of her use of the concept of the pariah. In the second essay, Arendt discusses acting qua human, the rights granted by membership in a (cosmo)polis, and what “citizen of the world” (cosmopolitan?) means in relation to the public space, and she stresses the value of communication, with the living and the dead. Furthermore, Arendt differentiates between cosmopolitan and European. I argue that postwar European integration challenges in unexpected ways Arendt's view both on rights as linked to nationality and on citizenship in a cosmopolitan polity.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 128 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 629 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Amanda. “Cosmopolitanism, Universalism, and the Divided Legacies of Modernity.” Cosmo-politics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Ed. Cheah, Pheng and Robbins, Bruce. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1998. 265–89. Print.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “The Jew as Pariah: A Hidden Tradition.” Reflections on Literature and Culture. Ed. Gottlieb, Susannah Young-ah. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. 69–90. Print.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Karl Jaspers: Citizen of the World?” Men in Dark Times. San Diego: Harcourt, 1995. 81–94. Print.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Rosa Luxemburg: 1871-1919.” Men in Dark Times. San Diego: Harcourt, 1995. 33–56. Print.Google Scholar
Asensio García, Javier. “Bernardo del Carpio, un héroe de la épica medieval en la tradición de los gitanos del norte peninsular.” Kalakorikos 15 (2010): 313–37. Print.Google Scholar
“Bañando está las prisiones.” El romancero vulgar y nuevo. Ed. Salazar, Flor. Madrid: Fundación Ramón Menéndez Pidal; U Complutense de Madrid, 1999. 9. Print.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, and Grande, Edgar. Cosmopolitan Europe. Trans. Cronin, Ciaran. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Birus, Hendrik. “The Goethean Concept of World Literature and Comparative Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 2.4 (2000): n. pag. Web. 7 Jan. 2013.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “In the Name of Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Ed. Bernheimer, Charles. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995. 107–16. Print.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “The Old/New Question of Comparison in Literary Studies: A Post-European Perspective.” The Age of the World Target: Self-Referentiality in War, Theory, and Comparative Work. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. 71–115. Print.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. Great Empires, Small Nations: The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State. New York: Routledge, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. Trans. Polan, Dana. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
César, Domínguez. “World Literature and Cosmopolitanism.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Theo D'haen, David Damrosch, and Kadir, Djelal. London: Routledge, 2012. 242–52. Print.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Isabel. Bury Me Standing: The Gypsies and Their Journey. New York: Vintage, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Gheorghe, Nicolae. “Key-Note Speech.” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. OSCE, 2013. Web. 7 Jan 2013.Google Scholar
Grass, Günter. “A Blind Spot in the Consciousness of Europe: Interview with Günter Grass.” Interview by Hannes Swoboda and Jan Marinus Wiersma. Roma: A European Minority: The Challenge of Diversity. Ed. Monika Flasiková-Beñová, Swoboda, and Wiersma, . [Brussels]: European Parliament, 2001. 25–31. Print.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. “Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture.” Theory, Culture and Society 7.2-3 (1990): 237–51. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Patrick. Political Evil in a Global Age: Hannah Arendt and International Theory. New York: Routledge, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, Djelal. Memos from the Besieged City: Lifelines for Cultural Sustainability. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. Kosmopolitismus. Tübingen: Fischer, n.d. Digital file.Google Scholar
Meltzl, Hugo. “Present Tasks of Comparative Literature (1877).” The Princeton Sourcebook in Comparative Literature: From the European Enlightenment to the Global Present. Ed. Damrosch, David, Melas, Natalie, and Buthelezi, Mbongiseni. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2009. 41–49. Print.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Faber, Marion. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texte, Joseph. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Cosmopolitan Spirit in Literature. Trans. Matthews, J. W. London: Duckworth, 1899. Print.Google Scholar
Toninato, Paola. “The Rise of Written Literature among the Roma: A Study of the Role of Writing in the Current Redefinition of Romani Identity with Specific Reference to the Italian Case.” Diss. U of Warwick, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar