No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
Over the last few decades, my work has been animated by the fundamental question, how can we make strange the universalist claims or assumptions of the epistemologies with which we work in order to reveal their cultural specificity? It is a question that also emerges in connection with modes of racialization. Thus, one should not simply compare types of racialization, as though they were commensurable, but ask what one can do to show the work these concepts perform in relation to specific histories and languages. My own familiar methods of articulating processes of racialization became thoroughly destabilized on a recent visit to India, where the functions of caste appeared to trump questions of racialization in critical discussions. But before entering this minefield of complexities and contradictions, let me summarize the previous work with which I've been associated.
- Type
- Correspondents at Large
- Information
- PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 5: Special Topic Comparative Racialization , October 2008 , pp. 1723 - 1727
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America
References
Works Cited
Clough, Patricia Ticineto, with Halley, Jean, eds. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Debjani, Ganguly. Caste, Colonialism, and Counter-modernity: Notes on a Postcolonial Hermeneutics of Caste. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Gunew, Sneja. Haunted Nations: The Colonial Dimensions of Multiculturalisms. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. “Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity.” Identities: Race, Class, Gender, and Nationality. Ed. Alcoff, Linda Martin and Mendieta, Eduardo. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. 360–68.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Bonita, and Dua, Enakshi. “Decolonizing Antiracism.” Social Justice 32.4 (2005): 120–43.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montag, Warren. “The Universalization of Whiteness: Racism and Enlightenment.” Whiteness: A Critical Reader. Ed. Hill, Mike. New York: New York UP, 1997. 281–93.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. “Whiteness, Epistemology and Indigenous Representation.” Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Ed. Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies, 2004. 75–88.Google Scholar
Oommen, T. K. “Race and Caste: Anthropological and Sociological Perspectives.” Thorat and Umakant 97–109.Google Scholar
Roediger, David, ed. Black on White: Black Writers on What It Means to Be White. New York: Schocken, 1998.Google Scholar
Sabir, Sabir. “Chimerical Categories: Caste, Race and Genetics.” Developing World Bioethics 3.2 (2003): 17–177.Google Scholar
“Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes” Wikipedia. 1 Apr 2008. Wikimedia Foundation. 8 May 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduled_Castes_and_Tribes>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Afterword. Imaginary Maps: Three Stories by Mahasveta Devi. Trans. Spivak. New York: Routledge, 1995. 197–205.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. London: Macmillan, 1988. 271–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. New York: Routledge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Translator's Preface. Imaginary Maps: Three Stories by Mahasveta Devi. Trans. Spivak. New York: Routledge, 1995. xxiii–xxix.Google Scholar
Thorat, Sukhadeo, and Umakant, , eds. Caste, Race and Discrimination: Discourses in International Context. Indian Inst. of Dalit Studies. Jaipur: Rawat, 2004.Google Scholar