Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T21:20:41.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Croismare Documents: Weighing the Authenticity of Letters to Diderot's “Religieuse” and Mme Madin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Marquis de Croismare ,
Dan Valahu  and
Heather Lloyd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thus does Denis Diderot express his skepticism about whether it was actually the Marquis de Croismare, an Ostensibly Innocent player in the machinations leading to the composition of La religieuse, who replied to letters to him by Diderot and company or whether Frédéric Grimm and friends tricked Diderot into believing it was Croismare. Counterbalancing the philosophe's questioning volley is Grimm's assertion in the “Préface”:

Vous voudrez bien vous souvenir que toutes ses [Madin's] lettres, ainsi que celles de sa recluse, ont été fabriquées par nous autres enfants de Bélial, et que toutes les lettres de son généreux protecteur sont véritables et ont été écrites de bonne foi, ce qu'on eut toutes les peines du monde à persuader à M. Diderot qui se croyait persiflé par le marquis et par ses amis.

(Diderot, Religieuse 33)

Type
Little-Known Documents
Information
PMLA , Volume 121 , Issue 2 , March 2006 , pp. 532 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The photographs of Croismare's discourse to the Société Royale d'Agriculture de Caen, on pages 537-39, are reproduced by permission of the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Caen and those of his letter to Père André, on pages 541-42, by permission of the Bibliothèque de Caen.

References

Works Cited

Antoine, Charma, and Mancel, G., eds. Le Père André, Jésuite, documents inédits pour servir à l'histoire philosophique, religieuse et littéraire du XVIIIe siècle. 2 vols. 1844 (vol. 1), 1856 (vol. 2). Paris: Hachette, 1857.Google Scholar
Connon, Derek. Diderot's Endgames. French Studies of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries 11. Oxford: Lang, 2002.Google Scholar
Cousin, Victor. Introduction. Œuvres philosophiques du Père André. Paris: Charpentier, 1843. i-xi.Google Scholar
Denis, Diderot. Correspondance. Ed. Roth, G. and Varloot, J. Vol. 3. Paris: Minuit, 1957. 16 vols. 1955–70.Google Scholar
Denis, Diderot. La religieuse. Ed. May, G. et al. Paris: Hermann, 1975. 81–288. Vol. 11 of Œuvres complètes. 25 vols. to date.Google Scholar
Grimm, Frédéric Melchior, et al. Correspondance littéraire. Vol. 2, pt. 1. Paris: Longchamps, 1813. 17 vols.Google Scholar
Georges, Huard. Les Croismare, seigneurs de Lasson: Deux académiciens caennais des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Caen: Jouan, 1921.Google Scholar
Nicolini, Fausto, ed. Amici e corrispondenti francesi dell'abate Galiani. Napoli: Banco di Napoli; Biblioteca del Bollettino dell' Archivio Storico, 1954.Google Scholar
Nicolini, Fausto. “Lettere inedite del d'Alembert, del maresciallo di Brissac et del marchese di Croismare all'abate Galiani.” Revue de littérature comparée 10 (1930): 757–59.Google Scholar
Perey, Lucien, and Maugras, Gaston. Dernières années de Madame d'Epinay. 2nd ed. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1883.Google Scholar
Pouthas, Charles Hippolyte. Les collèges de Caen au XVIIIe siècle. Caen: Jouan, 1911.Google Scholar