Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:18:02.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theology Still?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

“I hope my attitude will not be regarded as irreverent,” Maurizio Ascari declares before launching into a critique of Franco Moretti's critical methods (3). By contrast, I undertake no critique of Moretti's methods, but my attitude toward his work is at least somewhat irreverent, if also appreciative. I titled an early draft of this essay “Distant Reading and the New Poetics of Enchantment; or, Toward a Literary History That Is Spiritual but Not Religious.” This title was self-consciously outrageous, since there is little that is overtly enchanted, let alone spiritual, about Moretti's criticism. Indeed, one of the recurring rhetorical fillips in his book Distant Reading involves the disparagement of close reading as a kind of theology: “At bottom,” close reading is “a theological exercise—very solemn treatment of very few texts taken very seriously—whereas what we really need is a little pact with the devil: we know how to read texts, now let's learn how not to read them. Distant reading: where distance … is a condition of knowledge” (48; see also 33, 67, 89, and 113). By invoking enchantment and spirituality to describe his work, then, I was looking to underscore, a little cheekily, how rigorous engagement with his “pact with the devil” reveals similar features to those Moretti partly discredits—namely, credulity, “superstition” (Johnson 84), and “mystery” (Goodwin xiii). In essence, my aim was to employ close reading—of distant reading—as a kind of return, if not revenge, of the repressed.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Asad, Talal. “Thinking about Religion, Belief, and Politics.” The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, edited by Orsi, Robert A., Cambridge UP, 2012, pp. 3657.Google Scholar
Ascari, Maurizio. “The Dangers of Distant Reading: Reassessing Moretti's Approach to Literary Genres.” Genre: Forms of Discourse and Culture, vol. 47, no. 1, 2014, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. Number and Numbers. Translated by Mackay, Robin, Polity Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Michael, and Ruth, Jennifer. The Humanities, Higher Education, and Academic Freedom: Three Necessary Arguments. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, David. “The Humanist Vocation.” The New York Times, 20 June 2013, www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/opinion/brooks-the-humanist-vocation.html.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. edited by Phillips, Adam, Oxford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jenny. “The Next Cigarette and a Modest Garnish.” Goodwin and Holbo, pp. 8591.Google Scholar
English, James F., and Underwood, Ted. “Shifting Scales: Between Literature and Social Science.” Modern Language Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, 2016, pp. 277–95, mlq.dukejournals.org/content/77/3/277.full. PDF download.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. U of Chicago P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. “Planetary Literary History: The Place of the Text.” New Literary History, vol. 39, no. 3, 2008, pp. 657–84. Project Muse, muse.jhu.edu.erl.lib.byu. PDF download.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. “Over the Influence.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 4, 2016, pp. 731–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jonathan. Introduction. Goodwin and Holbo, pp. ix-xxi.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jonathan, and Holbo, John, editors. Reading Graphs, Maps, Trees: Responses to Franco Moretti. Parlor Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Say. Stanford UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. The Humanities and the Dream of America. U of Chicago P, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward, Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Johnson, Steven Berlin. “Distant Reading Minds.” Goodwin and Holbo, pp. 8184.Google Scholar
McCann, Sean. “Human, Not So Human: A Few Quibbles about Moretti's Graphs, Maps, Trees.” Goodwin and Holbo, pp. 108–14.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Price, Uvedale. An Essay on the Picturesque, as Compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful. J. Robson, 1794.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Katie. “Paratext and Genre System: A Response to Franco Moretti.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 36, no. 1, 2009, pp. 159–71. JSTOR, doi:10.1086/606126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickman, Matthew. Literature after Euclid: The Geometric Imagination in the Long Scottish Enlightenment. U of Pennsylvania P, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar