Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T11:33:03.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity Training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2023

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Altschuler, Sari. “Touching The Scarlet Letter: What Disability History Can Teach Us about Literature.” American Literature, vol. 92, no. 1, 2020, pp. 92122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attention, N.” Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford UP, 2022, www-oed-com.libproxy.albany.edu/view/Entry/12802?redirectedFrom=attention#eid.Google Scholar
Carter, Sarah Anne. Object Lessons: How Nineteenth-Century Americans Learned to Make Sense of the Material World. Oxford UP, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuh, Kandice. The Difference Aesthetics Makes. Duke UP, 2019.Google Scholar
Crain, Patricia. The Story of A: The Alphabetization of America from The New England Primer to The Scarlet Letter. Stanford UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Davey, Nicholas. “Baumgarten, Alexander G(ottlieb).A Companion to Aesthetics, edited by Davies, Stephen et al. , 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, p. 162.Google Scholar
Fisher, Dorothy Canfield. A Montessori Mother. Holt, 1912.Google Scholar
Fretwell, Erica. “1833–1932: American Literature's Other Scripts.” Timelines of American Literature, edited by Marrs, Cody and Hager, Christopher, Johns Hopkins UP, 2019, pp. 2136.Google Scholar
Gitter, Elisabeth. The Imprisoned Guest: Samuel Howe and Laura Bridgman, the Original Deaf-Blind Girl. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. “Assigned Reading.” Further Reading, edited by Rubery, Matthew and Price, Leah, Oxford UP, 2020, pp. 100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlazer, Ramsey. Old School: Modernism, Education, and the Critique of Progress. Fordham UP, 2020.Google Scholar
Mills, Mara. “Deaf Jam: From Inscription to Reproduction to Information.” Social Text, vol. 28, no. 1, 2010, pp. 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montessori, Maria. The Advanced Montessori Method: Spontaneous Activity in Education. Translated by Simmonds, Florence, Stokes, 1917.Google Scholar
Montessori, Maria. The Montessori Method. Translated by George, Anne E., Stokes, 1912.Google Scholar
Ogata, Amy. “Creative Playthings: Educational Toys and Postwar American Culture.” Winterthur Portfolio, vol. 39, no. 2, 2004, pp. 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortlieb, S. A., et al. “Fechner (1866): The Aesthetic Association Principle—a Commented Translation.” i-Perception, vol. 11, no. 3, 2020, pp. 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, Mark. Seeing with the Hands: Blindness, Vision, and Touch after Descartes. U of Edinburgh P, 2016.Google Scholar
Raber, Jesse. Progressivism's Aesthetic Education: The Bildungsroman and the American School, 1890–1920. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riskin, Jessica. Science in the Age of Sensibility: The Sentimental Empiricists of the French Enlightenment. U of Chicago P, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. Disability Aesthetics. U of Michigan P, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Steinberg, Suzanne. The Pinocchio Effect: On Making Italians, 1860–1920. U of Chicago P, 2007.Google Scholar
Weimer, David. “To Touch a Sighted World: Tactile Maps in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Winterthur Portfolio, vol. 51, no. 2, 2017, pp. 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar