Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:15:19.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Spectacle of Masculinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Bette London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While a strong feminist tradition has virtually revolutionized the reading of Frankenstein, giving the work's feminine subject new visibility and centrality, this approach has simultaneously obscured access to the text's theatrical display of masculinity. Yet an understanding of the deployment of the male body (in the novel and in the cultural construction of Mary Shelley) might challenge current understandings of both the gendering of Frankenstein and Frankenstein's place in the gendering of literary history. The spectacle of masculinity haunts late-nineteenth-century Shelleyan iconography and informs the gendered narratives that shape such influential studies as James Rieger's twentieth-century textual and biographical reconstructions of Frankenstein and its author. Given this history, a feminist critique can profit from a reading of Frankenstein's insistent exhibition of masculinity, for the male spectacle unfixes gender hierarchies, illuminating the fractures and contradictions underlying masculine authority. (BL)

Type
Cluster: Figuring Gender
Information
PMLA , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , March 1993 , pp. 253 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Cameron, Kenneth Neill The Young Shelley: Genesis of a Radical. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar
Carson, James P “Bringing the Author Forward: Frankenstein through Mary Shelley's Letters.” Criticism 30 (1988): 431–43.Google Scholar
Cottom, Daniel “Frankenstein and the Monster of Representation.” Substance 28 (1980): 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Kate “Monsters in the Garden: Mary Shelley and the Bourgeois Family.” Levine and Knoepflmacher 123–12.Google Scholar
Favret, Mary A “The Letters of Frankenstein.” Genre 20 (1987): 3–24.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan “Horror's Twin: Mary Shelley's Monstrous Eve.” The Madwoman in the Attic. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979. 213–21.Google Scholar
Hodges, Devon “Frankenstein and the Feminine Subversion of the Novel.” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 2 (1983): 155–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, Margaret Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women's Writing. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986.Google Scholar
Jacobus, Mary “Is There a Woman in This Text?” New Literary History 14 (1982): 117–11. Rpt. in Reading Woman: Essays in Feminist Criticism. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Barbara “My Monster/My Self.” Diacritics 12.2 (1982): 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoepflmacher, U. C “Thoughts on the Aggression of Daughters.” Levine and Knoepflmacher 88–119.Google Scholar
Lavallay, Albert J “The Stage and Film Children of Frankenstein: A Survey.” Levine and Knoepflmacher 243–24.Google Scholar
Levine, George, and Knoepflmacher, U. C., eds The Endurance of Frankenstein. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979.Google Scholar
Marshall, David The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.Google Scholar
McInerney, Peter “Frankenstein and the Godlike Science of Letters.” Genre 13 (1980): 455–45.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne K Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. New York: Methuen, 1988.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A “Cage aux Folles: Sensation and Gender in Wilkie Collins's The Woman in White.” Representations 14 (1986): 107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moers, Ellen “Female Gothic.” Levine and Knoepflmacher 77–87.Google Scholar
Mullan, John Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Neale, Steve “Masculinity as Spectacle: Reflections on Men and Mainstream Cinema.” Screen 24.6 (1983): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Patricia Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary “My Hideous Progeny: Mary Shelley and the Feminization of Romanticism.” PMLA 95 (1980): 332–33. Rpt. in The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. 114–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, James “Mary Shelley's Life and the Composition of Frankenstein.” Shelley, Frankenstein xi-xxxvii. Scott, Peter Dale. “Vital Artifice: Mary, Percy, and the Psychopolitical Identity of Frankenstein.” Levine and Knoepflmacher 172–204.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus (the 1818 Text). Ed. Rieger, James. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1974.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky “Preface by Mary Shelley to First Collected Edition, 1839.” The Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Ed. Rogers, Neville. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1972. xlix–liii.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja “Fassbinder and Lacan: A Reconsideration of Gaze, Look, and Image.” Camera Obscura 19 (1989): 54–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Christopher Ariel like a Harpy: Shelley, Mary and Frankenstein. London: Gollancz, 1972.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Leo The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and in Modern Oblivion. New York: Pantheon, 1983.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Emily W Mary Shelley: Romance and Reality. Boston: Little, 1989.Google Scholar
Veeder, William Mary Shelley and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androgyny. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986.Google Scholar
Vickers, Nancy J “Diana Described: Scattered Woman and Scattered Rhyme.” Writing and Sexual Difference. Ed. Abel, Elizabeth. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1982. 95–110.Google Scholar
Vickers, Nancy J “The Mistress in the Masterpiece.” The Poetics of Gender. Ed. Miller, Nancy K. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 19–41.Google Scholar
White, Newman Ivey Shelley. 2 vols. New York: Knopf, 1940.Google Scholar