Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:59:27.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mallarmé's Cinepoetics: The Poem Uncoiled by the Cinématographe, 1893–98

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Christophe Wall-Romana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between 1893 and his death in 1898, Stéphane Mallarmé experimented with a poetics permeated by the emerging technology of cinema. Close to technicians and journalists of early film, Mallarmé developed what might be called a cinepoetics, especially in Un coup de dés (1897)—the ur-modernist visual poem whose preface recoups the single declaration he made on cinema—and in the unrealized project known as Le Livre (1893–98), a poetic performance involving electrical lighting and image projection. Close readings make explicit Mallarmé's cinepoetic aesthetics. Its epistemology of déroulement ‘unfolding’ is compared with that of other 1890s figures: Étienne-Jules Marey, Henri Bergson, and Loïe Fuller. Cinepoetry has not been recognized as the distinct practice it was, although Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida came close to theorizing Mallarmé's interest in cinema. Cinepoetic experimentation has shadowed the whole French vanguard. The study of its genealogy should reshape our understanding of the intersection of modernist lyricism and new media.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 120 , Issue 1: Special Topic: On Poetry , January 2005 , pp. 128 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abel, Richard. “Exploring the Discursive Field of the Surrealist Scenario Text.” Dada and Surrealist Film. Ed. Rudolf, E. Kuenzli. Cambridge: MIT P, 1996. 58–71.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard. French Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology. Vol. 1 (1907-39). Princeton: Princeton UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Apollinaire, Guillaume. A quelle heure un train partira-t-ilpour Paris? Ed. Bohn, Willard. Fontfroide: Biblio-thèque Artistique et Littéraire, 1982.Google Scholar
Apollinaire, Guillaume. œvres en prose. Vol. 2. Paris: Gallimard, 1991.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Reflections. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. New York: Schocken, 1986.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Guvres completes. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.Google Scholar
Berr, Émile. “La vie litteraire.” Le Figaro 27 Apr. 1897: 4.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. The Death of Mallarme. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. Le livre à venir. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.Google Scholar
Bohn, Willard. The Rise of Surrealism: Cubism, Dada, and the Pursuit of the Marvelous. Buffalo: State U of New York P, 2002.Google Scholar
Boschetti, Anna. La poésie partout: Apollinaire, homme$Apoque (1898-1918). Paris: Seuil, 2001.Google Scholar
Bowie, Malcolm. Mallarme and the Art of Being Difficult. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Breton, André. “As in a Wood.” The Shadow and Its Shadow: Surrealist Writings on the Cinema. Ed. trans, and. Paul Hammond. San Francisco: City Lights, 2000. 72–77.Google Scholar
Breton, André. “Comme dans un bois.” Guvres completes. Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1999. 902–07.Google Scholar
Byg, Barton. Landscapes of Resistance: The German Films of Daniéle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995.Google Scholar
Carou, Alain. Le cinéma frangais et les écrivains: Histoire dune rencontre 1906-1914. Paris: Ecole Nationale des Chartes / AFRHC, 2002.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noel. “Eisenstein's Philosophy of Film.” Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida: Essays in Honor of Annette Michelson. Ed. Allen, Richard and Turvey, Malcolm. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP, 2003. 127–46.Google Scholar
Cocteau, Jean. Du cinématographe. Paris: Belfond, 1973.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. La Troisième République des let-tres, de Flaubert à Proust. Paris: Seuil, 1983.Google Scholar
Crafton, Donald. $EAmile Cohl, Caricature, and Film. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge: MIT P, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagognet, Francois. Etienne-Jules Marey: La passion de la trace. Paris: Hazan, 1987.Google Scholar
Décaudin, Michel. La crise des valeurs symbolistes: 20 ans depoésie frangaise (1895-1914). Toulouse: Privat, 1960.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Habberjam, Barbara. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. La dissemination. Paris: Seuil, 1972.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. Invention de lhystérie: Charcot et l'iconographiephotographique de la Salpétrière. Paris: Macula, 1982.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. The Eisenstein Reader. Ed. Taylor, Richard. Trans. Taylor and William Powell. London: British Film Inst., 1998.Google Scholar
Epstein, Jean. $EAcrits sur le cinema. 2 vols. Paris: Seghers, 1974-75.Google Scholar
Epstein, Jean. La poésie d'aujourd'hui: Un nouvel état d'intelligence. Paris: Sirène, 1921.Google Scholar
Fondane, Benjamin. $EAcrits pour le cinema, le muet et le parlant. Ed. Carassou, Michel. Paris: Plasma, 1984.Google Scholar
Fouquier, Henry. “Les théâtres.” Le Figaro 15 Nov. 1896: 3.Google Scholar
Frizot, Michel. “Comment ça marche: L'algorithme cinématographique.” Cinematheque 15 (1999): 15–27.Google Scholar
Gordon, Rae Beth. Why the French Love Jerry Lewis: From Cabaret to Early Cinema. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Gourmont, Remy de. “Le bücher.” Mercure de France June 1897: 558–63.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “Loi'e Fuller and the Art of Motion.” La decima musa / The Tenth Muse. Udine, It.: Forum, 2001. 25–34.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “New Thresholds of Vision: Instantaneous Photography and the Early Cinema of the Lumiere.” Impossible Presence: Surface and Screen in the Photogenic Era. Ed. Smith, Terry. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001. 71–99.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mark. Embodying Technesis: Technology beyond Writing. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2002.Google Scholar
Hansen, Miriam. “Benjamin and Cinema: Not a OneWay Street.” Benjamin's Ghosts: Interventions in Contemporary Literary and Cultural Theory. Ed. Richter, Gerhard. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. 41–73.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. Writing Machines. Cambridge: MIT P, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillel-Erlanger, Irène. Voyages en kaleidoscope. Paris: Crès, 1919.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Julian, and Brooks, Virginia. “Movies in the Mind's Eye.” Post-theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Ed. Bordwell, David and Carroll, Noel. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1996. 368–87.Google Scholar
Hubert, Étienne-Alain. “Le Ṣsurréalismeṣ d'Apollinaire et l'invention de la roue.” Circonstances de la poésie: Reverdy, Apollinaire, surrealisme. Paris: Klincksieck, 2000. 287–90.Google Scholar
Huret, Jules. “Concerts et spectacles.” Le Figaro 11 Feb. 1896: 4.Google Scholar
Huret, Jules. “Le courrier des theatres.” Le Figaro 23 Apr. 1896: 4.Google Scholar
Iampolski, Mikhail. “La danse, le cinema et un peu de physique.” Cinémathèque 9 (1996): 94–103.Google Scholar
Ibels, André. “Enquete sur le roman illustré par la photographie.” Mercure de France Jan. 1898: 97–115.Google Scholar
Janicot, Christian. Anthologie du cinema invisible: 100 scenarios pour cent ans de cinéma. Paris: Place-Arte, 1995.Google Scholar
Kahn, Gustave. “Essai sur le vers libre.” Premiers poèmes. Paris: Mercure de France, 1897. 3–38.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Trans. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey and Wutz, Michael. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Lista, Giovanni. Loïe Fuller, danseuse de la Belle-Époque. Paris: Stock, 1994.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane. Correspondance. 12 vol. Ed. Henri Mondor, Jean-Pierre Richard, and Lloyd James Austin. Paris: Gallimard, 1959-85.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane. Le “Livre” de Mallarme. Ed. Scherer, Jacques. Paris: Gallimard, 1977.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane. œuvres complètes. Ed. Mondor, Henri and Jean-Aubry, G. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane. œuvres complètes. Ed. Marchal, Bertrand. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar
Mannoni, Laurent. “Une feerie de 1896: La biche au bois.” Cinémathèque 10 (1996): 117–23.Google Scholar
Mannoni, Laurent. The Great Art of Light and Shadow: Archaeology of the Cinema. Trans. Crangle, Richard. Exeter: U of Exeter P, 2000.Google Scholar
Marchal, Bertrand. Mallarmé: Mémoire de la critique. Paris: Presses de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, 1998.Google Scholar
Marey, Étienne-Jules. Le mouvement. 1894. Nimes: Chambon, 2002.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, Susan. “‘Delights in Dislocation’: The Cinematic Modernism of Stein, Chaplin, and Man Ray.” Modernism/Modernity 8 (2001): 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarren, Felicia. Dance Pathologies: Performance, Poetics, Medicine. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Meschonnic, Henri. “Mallarmé au-delà du silence.” $EAcrits sur le livre. Ed. Valensi, Michel. Paris: Eclat, 1985. 13–62.Google Scholar
Meusy, Jean-Jacques. Paris-Palaces, ou le temps des cinémas (1894-1918). Paris: CNRS, 1995.Google Scholar
Michelson, Annette. “On the Eve of the Future: The Reasonable Facsimile and the Philosophical Toy.” October 29 (1988): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missac, Pierre. Walter Benjamin's Passages. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: MIT P, 1995.Google Scholar
Mondor, Henri. Autres précisions sur Mallarmé et inédits. Paris: Gallimard, 1961.Google Scholar
Mondor, Henri. Vie de Mallarmé. Paris: Gallimard, 1941.Google Scholar
Moore, Rachel O. Savage Theory: Cinema as Modern Magic. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Ortel, Philippe. La litterature à l'ère de la photographie: Enquete sur une révolution invisible. Nimes: Chambon, 2002.Google Scholar
Païni, Dominique. “Epstein et Man Ray: L'histoire d'un deni.” Jean Epstein: Cinéaste, poète, philosophe. Ed. Aumont, Jacques. Paris: Cinémathèque Française, 1998. 149–57.Google Scholar
Polizzotti, Mark. A Revolution of the Mind: The Life of André Breton. New York: Farrar, 1995.Google Scholar
Prado Feliu, José Ignacio. Mi(l) lente(s): Aparatos, espacios y cuerpos cinemáticos en la literatura hispánica y francesca. Madrid: Libertarias, 1998.Google Scholar
Prieur, Jérôme, and Morel, Jean-Paul. “La machine à l'œil bute.” Obliques 10-11 (1976): 107–35.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Mallarme: La politique de la sirène. Paris: Hachette, 1996.Google Scholar
Ray, Robert B. How a Film Theory Got Lost and Other Mysteries in Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre. L'univers imaginaire de Mallarmé. Paris: Seuil, 1961.Google Scholar
Rittaud-Hutinet, Jacques, and Rittaud-Hutinet, Chantal. Dictionnaire des cinematographes en France (1896-1897). Paris: Champion, 1999.Google Scholar
Rutsky, R. L. High Techné: Art and Technology from the Machine Aesthetic to the Posthuman. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1999.Google Scholar
Sadoul, Georges. Lumière et Méliés. Paris: Lherminier, 1985.Google Scholar
Saint-Pol-Roux. Cinema vivant. 1930. Mortemart: Rougerie, 1972.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Vanessa R. “Cinematic Spectatorship before the Apparatus: The Public Taste for Reality in Fin-de-Siècle Paris.” Cinema and the Invention of Modern Life. Ed. Charney, Leo and Schwartz, . Berkeley: U of California P, 1995. 297–319.Google Scholar
Shaw, Mary Lewis. Performance in the Texts of Mallarmé: The Passage from Art to Ritual. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Sicard, Monique. L'année 1895, l'image écartelée entre voir et savoir. Plessis-Robinson, Fr.: Synthelabo, 1994.Google Scholar
Singer, Ben. Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts. New York: Columbia UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Süssekind, Flora. Cinematograph of Words: Literature, Technique, and Modernization in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997.Google Scholar
“Théâtre de l'Œuvre.” Mercure de France Aug. 1894: 380–83.Google Scholar
Tortajada, Maria. “Alfred Jarry: Le cinematographe contre la photographie.” La decima musa / The Tenth Muse. Udine, It.: Forum 2001. 101–13.Google Scholar
Turvey, Malcolm. “Jean Epstein's Cinema of Immanence: The Rehabilitation of the Corporeal Eye.” October 83 (1998): 25–50.Google Scholar
Uzanne, Octave. “Une visite chez Edison.” Le Figaro 8 May 1893: 1.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. Guvres completes. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1957.Google Scholar
Villiers de l'Isle-Adam. Contes cruels. Paris: Gallimard, 1983.Google Scholar
Villiers de l'Isle-Adam. L'Ève future. 1886. Paris: Mercure de France, 1922.Google Scholar
Virmaux, Alain, and Virmaux, Odette. Les surréalistes et le cinéma. Paris: Seghers, 1976.Google Scholar
Woodehouse, John. Gabriele DAnnunzio. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar