Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T05:47:57.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

However Imperceptibly: From the Historical to the Sublime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

About thirty-five years ago, my professor in a course on seventeenth-century english social history began with the following. “You may have heard,” he said, “that the reading list for this course has not changed since I took it here in 1924.” Here he paused. “But I can assure you that it has changed”—he paused again, and added, sotto voce—“however imperceptibly.” These words have long seemed emblematic for me of the pride felt by much of the historical profession in the continuity of its essential practices. I do not mean, of course, that historians have not embraced new groups of people, adopted a much wider array of ideological stances, and above all invented a researchable historicity for many things that had never before seemed to have a history. All this innovation is splendid, and the finest products of academic history constitute a rich and admirable body of work. But in the essential practices, especially the practice of reading—the basic relation of reader with language and imagination—change is, shall we say, hardly perceptible. It seems that the charge that historians are professionally taught not to read is almost as true now as it was two decades ago when Dominick LaCapra made it (339). But if we are to learn about the historical imagination, histories need to be read and academic historians need to be reminded from time to time that what they do is as subject to the formative pressures of discourse as any other precinct of the world of words.

Type
Talks from the Convention
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper, 1992.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sande. “On the Difference between an Event and a Narrative.” Amer. Historical Assn. Boston. 6 Jan. 2001.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Gossman, Lionel. Between History and Literature. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Iggers, George. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. Bernard. New York: Hafner, 1951.Google Scholar
Kellner, Hans. Language and Historical Representation: Getting the Story Crooked. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1989.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Punter, David. The Romantic Unconscious: A Study in Narcissism and Patriarchy. New York: New York UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Rigney, Ann. Imperfect Histories: The Elusive Past and the Legacy of Romantic Historicism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2001.10.7591/9781501729683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich von. “On the Sublime.” “Naive and Sentimental Poetry” and “On the Sublime”: Two Essays. Trans. J. A. Elias. New York: Ungar, 1966.Google Scholar
Scott, A. O. “Beauty Is Back.” New York Times Magazine 9 Dec. 2001: 58.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1990.Google Scholar