Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:47:16.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homer in a Nutshell: Vergilian Miniaturization and the Sublime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

This paper explores the strange fascination with smallness that runs through Vergil's Aeneid, focusing on the bee simile in book 1, the poem's inaugural miniaturizing moment. Deviating from the standard paradigms of Vergilian criticism, I suggest we can learn a great deal about smallness in this poem by studying it through the lens of the sublime. My analysis bypasses the proliferation of Romantic sublimes to draw primarily on a model of sublimity derived from Neil Hertz's influential reading of Longinus. Read through the Hertzian sublime, miniaturization in the Aeneid is revealed as a subtle articulation of the poem's running concern with power. The bee simile, I argue, enacts a threefold drama in which hero, author, and reader confront what I call their sublime condition, coming to terms with their implication in immensities beyond their comprehension and control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alfrey, Shawn. The Sublime of Intense Sociability: Emily Dickinson, H.D., and Gertrude Stein. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Arensberg, Mary. Introduction. The American Sublime. Ed. Arensberg, . Albany: State U of New York P, 1986. 120. Print.Google Scholar
Augustus. Res gestae divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Ed. Cooley, Alison E. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G., ed. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus. By Vergil. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, Alessandro. “Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis.” Martindale 271-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio. “Ghosts of Exile: Doubles and Nostalgia in Vergil's parva Troia (Aeneid 3.294ff.).” Classical Antiquity 16.1 (1997): 833. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, Peter. The Scroll and the Marble. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford UP, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Callimachus. Hymn to Apollo. Works. Trans. Mair, A. W. London: Heinemann; New York: Putnam's, 1921. N. pag. Perseus Digital Library. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.Google Scholar
Clausen, Wendell. “Callimachus and Latin Poetry.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 5.3 (1964): 181–96. Print.Google Scholar
Clausen, Wendell. “An Interpretation of the Aeneid.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68 (1964): 139–47. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Wendell. Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley: U of California P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Hymn before Sunrise, in the Vale of Chamouni.” Columbia Granger's World of Poetry Online. Columbia UP, 2013. Web. 17 Jan. 2013.Google Scholar
Crane, Gregory. “Bees without Honey, and Callimachean Taste.” American Journal of Philology 108.2 (1987): 399403. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, Jonathan D.The Hertzian Sublime.” MLN 120.5 (2005): 969–85. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, Marco, and Hunter, Richard. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Galinsky, Karl. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. “Virgil's Style.” Virgil's Aeneid. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1987. 3155. Print.Google Scholar
Hamilton, John T. Soliciting Darkness: Pindar, Obscurity, and the Classical Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003. Print. Harvard Studies in Compar. Lit. 47.Google Scholar
Hardie, Philip. Virgil. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Print. New Surveys in Classics 28.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J.Some Views of the Aeneid in the Twentieth Century.” Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid. Ed. Harrison. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990. 120. Print.Google Scholar
Heinze, Richard. Virgil's Epic Technique. 1902. Trans. Harvey, Hazel, Harvey, David, and Robertson, Fred. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Hertz, Neil. “A Reading of Longinus.” The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia UP, 1985. 120. Print.Google Scholar
Homer. Iliad. Trans. A. T. Murray. 1924. Rev. William F. Wyatt. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. 1961. Garden City: Anchor, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Roger A. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil's Epic Similes. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Roger A.The Vergilian Simile as Means of Judgment.” Classical Journal 60.8 (1964): 337–44. Print.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan F.Virgilian Epic.” Martindale 145-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, James. Sublimity: The Non-rational and the Irrational in the History of Aesthetics. New York: Routledge, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Kuhns, Richard. “The Beautiful and the Sublime.” New Literary History 13.2 (1982): 287307. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longinus. On the Sublime. Classical Literary Criticism. Ed. and trans. Dorsch, T. S. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965. 97158. Print.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Macksey, Richard. “Longinus Reconsidered.” MLN 108.5 (1993): 913–34. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.Google Scholar
Magalia.” Harper's Latin Dictionary: A New Latin Dictionary Founded on the Translation of Freund's Latin-German Lexicon. Ed. Andrews, E. A. Cincinnati: Amer. Bk. Company, 1907. Print.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Adam. “The Two Voices of Virgil's Aeneid.” Virgil. Ed. Philip Hardie. Vol. 3. 1963. London: Routledge, 1999. 4964. Print. Critical Assessments of Classical Authors.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder. C. Plini Secundi naturalis historiae libri xxxvii. Ed. Mayhoff, Karl. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Teubner, 1906. Print.Google Scholar
Polleichtner, Wolfgang. “The Bee Simile: How Vergil Emulated Apollonius in His Use of Homeric Poetry.” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 8 (2005): 115–60. Print.Google Scholar
Propertius, S. Sexti Properti elegi. Ed. Heyworth, S. J. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Print. Oxford Classical Texts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Michael C. J.The Lyric Genius of the Aeneid.” Why Virgil? A Collection of Interpretations. Ed. Quinn, Stephanie. Wauconda: Bolchazy-Carducci, 2000. 255–66. Print.Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael C. J. The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1965. Print.Google Scholar
Quinn, Kenneth. Vergil's Aeneid: A Critical Description. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Quint, David. “Repetition and Ideology in the Aeneid.” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 23 (1989): 954. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ram, Harsha. The Imperial Sublime: A Russian Poetics of Empire. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Ramazani, Vaheed K.Historical Cliché: Irony and the Sublime in L'éducation sentimentale.” PMLA 108.1 (1993): 121–35. Print.Google Scholar
Selden, Daniel. “Alibis.” Classical Antiquity 17.2 (1998): 289412. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Philip. The Sublime. London: Routledge, 2006. Print. New Critical Idiom.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. “Mont Blanc.” The Norton Anthology of Poetry. Ed. Allison, Alexander W. et al. 3rd ed. New York: Norton, 1983. 616–18. Print.Google Scholar
Spence, Sarah. “Varium et Mutabile: Voices of Authority in Aeneid 4.” Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Ed. Perkell, Christine. Norman: U of Oklahoma P, 1999. 8095. Print.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham: Duke UP, 1993. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syed, Yasmin. Vergil's Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Theadorakopoulos, Elena. “Closure: The Book of Virgil.” Martindale 155-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergil, P. Aeneidos [Aeneid]. Vergil, P. Vergili Maronis opera 103-422.Google Scholar
Vergil, P. Bucolica [Eclogues]. Vergil, P. Vergili Maronis opera 1-28.Google Scholar
Vergil, P. Georgicon [Georgics]. Vergil, P. Vergili Maronis opera 29-101.Google Scholar
Vergil, P. The Georgics. Trans. Wilkinson, L. P. New York: Penguin, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Vergil, P. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Ed. Mynors, R. A. B. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1969. Print. Oxford Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Warmington, B. H. Carthage. Rev. ed. London: Hale, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
West, David, trans. The Aeneid. By Virgil. 1990. New York: Penguin, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Williams, Gordon. Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude; or, Growth of a Poet's Mind: An Autobiographical Poem. London: Moxon, 1850. Literature Online. Web. 17 Jan. 2013.Google Scholar