Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:16:59.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Griffith, Dickens, and the Politics of Composure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Daniel Siegel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay interrogates Sergei Eisenstein's critique of D. W. Griffith's montage aesthetic, arguing that, in Griffith's Orphans of the Storm, historical perspective is constituted in opposition to (rather than as a result of) the forward surge of the film's montage. Griffith represents historical consciousness through the narrative figure of trembling, harking back to Charles Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities, another text in which the movements of history are registered on the bodies of witnesses who struggle to keep their composure. Both Griffith and Dickens construct a social world driven to extremes by competing ideological forces and imagine historical subjects whose reactions to emergency—witnessing and trembling—hold them apart from it. Ultimately, these gestures of response suggest a tendency in melodramatic texts to construct a normative subjectivity that resists the antithetical underpinnings of melodrama itself.

Type
Victorian Cluster
Information
PMLA , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 375 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Altman, Rick. “Dickens, Griffith, and Film Theory Today.” South Atlantic Quarterly 88.2 (1989): 321–59. Rpt. in Silent Film. Ed. Abel, Richard. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1996. 145–62. Print.Google Scholar
“The Archbishop of York on Works of Fiction.” The Times 2 Nov. 1864: 9. Rpt. in Aurora Floyd. By Mary Elizabeth Braddon. Ed. Richard Nemesvari and Lisa Surridge. Peterborough: Broadview, 1998. 580–82. Print.Google Scholar
Aumont, Jacques. Montage Eisenstein. Trans. Lee Hildreth, Constance Penley, and Andrew Ross. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Bordwell, David. The Cinema of Eisenstein. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. “The Historical Novel Goes to Hollywood: Scott, Griffith, and Film Epic Today.” The Romantics and Us: Essays on Literature and Culture. Ed. Ruoff, Gene. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1990. 237–73. Print.Google Scholar
Crosby, Christina. The Ends of History: Victorians and the “Woman Question.” New York: Routledge, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Daly, Nicholas. “Railway Novels: Sensation Fiction and the Modernization of the Senses.” ELH 66.2 (1999): 461–87. Print.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. A Tale of Two Cities. 1859. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. “A Dialectic Approach to Film Form.” The Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Trans. and ed. Leyda, Jay. San Diego: Harcourt, 1977. 45–63. Print.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. “Dickens, Griffith, and the Film Today.” The Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Trans. and ed. Leyda, Jay. San Diego: Harcourt, 1977. 195–255. Print.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei, dir. Strike [Stachka]. 1925. Kino, 1990. Laser disc.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. “Word and Image.” The Film Sense. Trans. and ed. Leyda, Jay. San Diego: Harcourt, 1975. 1–65. Print.Google Scholar
George, Ford, and Lane, Lauriat Jr., eds. The Dickens Critics. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1961. Print.Google Scholar
Goodwin, James. Eisenstein, Cinema, and History. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Griffith, D. W., dir. Orphans of the Storm. 1921. Kino, 2002. DVD.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. D. W. Griffith and the Origins of American Narrative Film. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom. “‘Now You See It, Now You Don't’: The Temporality of the Cinema of Attractions.” Velvet Light Trap 32 (1993): 3–12. Rpt. in Silent Film. Ed. Abel, Richard. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1996. 71–84. Print.Google Scholar
Hadley, Elaine. Melodramatic Tactics: Theatricalized Dissent in the English Marketplace, 1800–1885. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
John, Juliet. Dickens's Villains: Melodrama, Character, Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Trans. Hannah Mitchell and Stanley Mitchell. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1962. Print.Google Scholar
Maunder, Andrew. “Mapping the Victorian Sensation Novel: Some Recent and Future Trends.” Literature Compass 2.1 (2005): 1–33. Print.Google Scholar
May, Lary. Screening Out the Past: The Birth of Mass Culture and the Motion Picture Industry. New York: Oxford UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Nikolopoulou, Anastasia. “Historical Disruptions: The Walter Scott Melodramas.” Melodrama: The Cultural Emergence of a Genre. Ed. Hays, Michael and Nikolopoulou, . New York: St. Martin's, 1996. 121–43. Print.Google Scholar
Paroissien, David. “Dickens and the Cinema.” Dickens Studies Annual 7 (1978): 68–80. Print.Google Scholar
Lyn, Pykett. Afterword. Beyond Sensation: Mary Elizabeth Braddon in Context. Albany: State U of New York P, 2000. 277–80. Print.Google Scholar
Rignall, J. M. “Dickens and the Catastrophic Continuum in A Tale of Two Cities.” ELH 51.2 (1984): 575–87. Print.Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. “Dickens, Eisenstein, Film.” Dickens on Screen. Ed. Glavin, John. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. 122–44. Print.Google Scholar
Trodd, Anthea. “Resistance in the Haunted House: A Perspective on Melodrama.” Journal of Victorian Culture 4.2 (1999): 292–304. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, David. “The Reception of A Tale of Two Cities: Part I.” Dickens Studies Newsletter 10 (1979): 8–13. Print.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “Feeling Public: Sensation Theater, Commodity Culture, and the Victorian Public Sphere.” Victorian Studies 44.1 (2001): 245–74. Print.Google Scholar
Wees, William. “Dickens, Griffith, and Eisenstein: Form and Image in Literature and Film.” Humanities Association Review 24 (1973): 266–76. Print.Google Scholar
Zambrano, Ana Laura. “The Style of Dickens and Griffith: A Tale of Two Cities and Orphans of the Storm.” Language and Style 7 (1974): 53–61. Print.Google Scholar