Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T06:47:12.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Genre and Place of the Intimations Ode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Joseph C. Sitterson Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Intimations Ode appears at the end of Wordsworth's collected poetry, and both the placement and the ending of the poem implicitly encourage us to expect an assured closure. I argue that Wordsworth deliberately suggests and then refuses such closure, that while the odic tradition generically warrants the attempt at closure, the Intimations Ode's refusal is unique. The overall temporal sequence that Wordsworth gives the poems and the frequency with which narratives and odes end groups of poems show that he consistently includes lyric in a larger narrative plot, an inclusion that also occurs within the Intimations Ode itself. Seeing Wordsworth's ode as a narrative and in relation to earlier English odes helps us understand that its uneasy coexistence of statement and uncertainty, which many critics consider its greatest weakness, is actually its greatest strength.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 24 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism. New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. “Structure and Style in the Greater Romantic Lyric.” From Sensibility to Romanticism. Ed. Hilles, Frederick W. and Bloom, Harold. New York: Oxford UP, 1965. 527–60.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert, ed. The Works of the British Poets. 13 vols. London, 1795.Google Scholar
Bate, W. J. The Burden of the Past and the English Poet. 1970. New York: Norton, 1972.Google Scholar
Bishop, Jonathan. “Wordsworth and the ‘Spots of Time.‘” ELH 26 (1959): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. 1783. Ed. Harding, Harold F. 2 vols. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn. New York: Harcourt, 1947.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. 1759. Ed. Boulton, J. T. New York: Columbia UP, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Irene M. “Rhetoric as Drama: An Approach to the Romantic Ode.” PMLA 79 (1964): 67–79.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. C. Romantic Paradox. New York: Barnes, 1963.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ralph. “On the Interrelations of Eighteenth-Century Literary Forms.” New Approaches to Eighteenth-Century Literature. Ed. Harth, Phillip. New York: Columbia UP, 1974. 33–78.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. Biographia Literaria. 1817. Ed. Engell, James and Jackson Bate, W. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. Coleridge's Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Raysor, Thomas Middleton. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1930.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance. Berkeley: U of California P, 1973.Google Scholar
Curtis, Jared, ed. Poems, in Two Volumes, and Other Poems, 1800-1807 by William Wordsworth. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Curtis, Jared, ed. Wordsworth's Experiments with Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather. Genre. New York: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. Wordsworth: Language as Counter-spirit. New Haven: Yale UP, 1977.Google Scholar
F[ogle], S[tephen] F. “Ode.” Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Ed. Alex Preminger et al. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1974. 585–86.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Fry, Paul H. The Poet's Calling in the English Ode. New Haven: Yale UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Harvey D. “Anglorum Pindarus: Model and Milieu.” Comparative Literature 17 (1965): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H. Wordsworth's Poetry, 1787-1814. 1964. New Haven: Yale UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Bahti, Timothy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982.Google Scholar
Johnson, Karl R. Jr. The Written Spirit: Thematic and Rhetorical Structure in Wordsworth's The Prelude. Salzburg: Inst. für Englische Sprache und Literatur, U Salzburg, 1978.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kenneth R. “The Idiom of Vision.” New Perspectives on Coleridge and Wordsworth. Ed. Hartman, Geoffrey H. New York: Columbia UP, 1972. 1–39.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kenneth R. “Recollecting Forgetting: Forcing Paradox to the Limit in the ‘Intimations Ode.‘” Wordsworth Circle 2 (1971): 59–64.Google Scholar
Jones, John. The Egotistical Sublime: A History of Wordsworth's Imagination. London: Chatto, 1954.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Starlit Dome. 1941. London: Methuen, 1959.Google Scholar
Knight, William, ed. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth. 8 vols. London, 1896.Google Scholar
Lindenberger, Herbert. On Wordsworth's Prelude. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Maclean, Norman. “From Action to Image: Theories of the Lyric in the Eighteenth Century.” Critics and Criticism. Ed. Crane, R. S. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1952. 408–60.Google Scholar
McNally, Paul. “Milton and the Immortality Ode.” Wordsworth Circle 11 (1980): 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Peter J. “Wordsworth's Intimations Ode and Its Epigraphs.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 82 (1983): 526–40.Google Scholar
Marsh, Florence G. “Wordsworth's Ode: Obstinate Questionings.” Studies in Romanticism 5 (1966): 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterfreund, Stuart. “The Prelude: Wordsworth's Metamorphic Epic.” Genre 14 (1981): 441–72.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen. Coleridge and Wordsworth: The Poetry of Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Reed, Mark L. “The Speaker of The Prelude.” Bicentenary Wordsworth Studies. Ed. Wordsworth, Jonathan. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1970. 276–93.Google Scholar
Reed, Mark L. Wordsworth: The Chronology of the Middle Years, 1800-1815. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Eric. Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Poetry 1660-1780. Boston: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Stones of Venice. Vol. 2. 1853. Vol. 10 of The Works of John Ruskin. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. New York: Longmans, 1904.Google Scholar
Sitter, John. Literary Loneliness in Mid-Eighteenth-Century England. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1968.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. “The Immortality Ode.” 1942. The Liberal Imagination. New York: Viking, 1950. 129–59.Google Scholar
Trotter, David. The Poetry of Abraham Cowley. Totowa: Rowman, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Helen. “Lionel Trilling and the Immortality Ode.” Salmagundi 41 (1978): 66–86.Google Scholar
Williams, Anne. “The Intimations Ode: Wordsworth's Fortunate Fall.” Romanticism Past and Present 5 (1981): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth. Ed. Ernest de Selincourt. 2nd ed. Rev. Chester L. Shaver et al. 6 vols. to date. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967–.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth. Rev. ed. Ernest de Selincourt and Helen Darbishire. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1952-59.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude 1799, 1805, 1850. Ed. Wordsworth, Jonathan, Abrams, M. H., and Gill, Stephen. New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1974.Google Scholar
Young, Edward. “On Lyric Poetry.” Anderson 10: 41–43.Google Scholar