Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T11:15:28.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fettered Fancy in Hard Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

David Sonstroem*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Storrs

Abstract

The major conflict in Hard Times pits Fact against Fancy; but Dickens ascribes two meanings to Fancy: imaginative play and fellow feeling. Each is directed separately against Fact: (1) The narrative personality combines images of life (horses, flowers, the sun, and fire) with images of lifelessness (pits, destructive violence, artificiality) in complex relationships, creating an impressive model of a highly fused, interdependent world, which contradicts the disjointed world of Gradgrindian Fact. (2) The virtuous characters employ fellow feeling to soften ills caused by Fact. But the novel does not show the 'components of Fancy to be coordinate, as Dickens implies. In practice, imaginative play provides a protective atmosphere of delusion, within which fellow feeling is supposed to grow to strength. Imagination fortifies innocence against the sordid and bad aspects of reality. Thus Dickens seems uncertain whether to work toward a coherent, interdependent world, or toward a scattering of islands of innocence—whether to employ imaginative play in building bridges to extend fellow feeling, or in building buffers to protect innocence. The result of his double advocacy is a series of probably unconscious compromises. Because the forces of Fancy are so divided, so fettered, the book's alternative to the Facts of Gradgrind is not so clear and attractive as one could wish.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In The Great Tradition (London, 1948), pp. 227–248. Quoted here from Hard Times: An Authoritative Text: Backgrounds, Sources, and Contemporary Reactions: Criticism, ed. George Ford and Sylvère Monod, Norton Critical Eds. (New York, 1966), p. 339. References to the novel, as well as incompletely elaborated page references to background material and critical articles, will be to this helpful volume.

2 Hard Times: For These Times, introd. William W. Watt, Rinehart Eds. (New York, 1958), p. xxxii.

3 P. 271. From “Frauds on the Fairies,” Household Words, 1 Oct. 1853.

4 P. 298. From “On Strike,” Household Words, 11 Feb. 1854.

5 P. 272. Speech in Birmingham Town Hall, 30 Dec. 1853.

6 Watt, p. xxx.

7 What are we to make of Sissy's nine oils, symbolizing her expectation that her father will return? Is it a knowing, willful self-delusion, an achieved credulity, manufactured for the sake of the health of her psyche? Or is Dickens showing her to be fooling herself in the same straightforward way that the Fact people fool themselves?

8 Of course I am not the first to call attention to Dickens' preoccupation with innocence. See, e.g., Audrey Lucas, “Some Dickens Women,” YR, xxix (1940), 706–728; and Leonard F. Manheim, “Floras and Doras: The Women in Dickens' Novels,” Texas Stud, in Lit. and Lang., vii (1965), 181–200.