Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:23:46.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Each Heav'nly Close”: Mythologies and Metrics in Spenser and the Early Poetry of Milton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

A poet cannot help borrowing images and verse shapes from earlier poems. But in adapting Spenser's final hexameter, a major writer like Milton makes an apparently simple formal imitation the locus for revisionary strategies of a highly figurative nature. Spenser's own prosodic choices are always shadowed by larger tropes of time, death, love, and voice, as is evident both in the rhetorical effects that characterize the closure of the Faerie Queene stanza and in the elusive river and echo mythologies that inhabit the refrains of the poet's two marriage odes. These works, in turn, strongly influence Milton's early strophic poetry, especially the Nativity Hymn and the song to Echo from Comas. Milton reinvents the hexameter close in ways that point to his larger poetic ambitions, finding in that metrical scheme a space in which to reflect on, oppose, and translate the deep structures of Spenserian mythmaking.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 21 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alpers, Paul J. The Poetry of The Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Barker, Arthur. “The Pattern of Milton's Nativity Ode.” University of Toronto Quarterly 10 (1940–41): 167–81.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry S. Jr.The Mutabilitie Cantos: Archaism and Evolution in Retrospect.” In Spenser: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Berger, Harry S. Jr. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968, 146–76.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry S. Jr.Spenser's ‘Prothalamion’: An Interpretation.” Essays in Criticism 15 (1965): 363–79. Rpt. in Essential Articles on Edmund Spenser. Ed. Hamilton, A. C. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1972, 509–23.Google Scholar
Broadbent, J. B.The Nativity Ode.” In The Living Milton: Essays by Various Hands. Ed. Kermode, Frank. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960, 1231.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie. Paradoxica Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of Paradoxes. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empson, William. Some Versions of Pastoral. New York: New Directions, 1968.Google Scholar
Fixler, Michael. “The Apocalypse within Paradise Lost.” In New Essays on Paradise Lost. Ed. Thomas Kranidas. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1969, 131–78.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. The Prophetic Moment: An Essay on Spenser. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. The Transcendental Masque: An Essay on Milton's “Comus.” Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Fry, Paul H. The Poet's Calling in the English Ode. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Endlesse Worke: Spenser and the Structures of Discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M.Spenser and the Epithalamic Convention.” Comparative Literature 9 (1957): 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Kenneth. Rev. of Endlesse Worke: Spenser and the Structures of Discourse, by Jonathan Goldberg. Yale Review 70 (1982): x–xvii.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Poetic Authority: Spenser, Milton, and Literary History. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, forthcoming in 1983.Google Scholar
Hanford, J. H.That Shepherd Who First Taught the Chosen Seed: A Note on Milton's Mosaic Inspiration.” University of Toronto Quarterly 8 (1938–39):403–19.Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey. Wordsworth's Poetry. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sherman. “Mutabilitie and the Cycle of the Months.” In Form and Convention in the Poetry of Edmund Spenser. Ed. Nelson, William. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1961, 76102.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. Lectures on the English Poets. London: Dent, 1910.Google Scholar
Hieatt, A. Kent. Short Time's Endless Monument: The Symbolism of Numbers in Edmund Spenser's “Epithalamion.” New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. “The Metrical Frame.” In his Vision and Resonance: Two Senses of Poetic Form. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1975, 135–74.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. The Untuning of the Sky: Ideas of Music in English Poetry, 1500–1700. New York: Norton, 1970.Google Scholar
Hyman, Lawrence W.Christ's Nativity and the Pagan Deities.” Milton Studies 2. Ed. Simmonds, J. D. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K.Spenser's Ainoretti and the English Sonnet Tradition.” In A Theatre for Spenserians. Ed. Kennedy, Judith M. and Reither, James A. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1973, 124–44.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. “The Spenserian Fluidity.” In The Burning Oracle. 1939. Rpt. and rev. in Poets of Action. London: Methuen, 1967, 117.Google Scholar
Ladner, Gerhard B. The Idea of Reform: Its Impact on Christian Thought and Action in the Age of the Fathers. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landor, Walter Savage. The Complete Works of Walter Savage Landor. Ed. Welby, T. Earle. 10 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1927.Google Scholar
Levin, Harry. The Myth of the Golden Age in the Renaissance. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T., and Short, Charles. A Latin Dictionary. 1879; rpt. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Poetical Works of John Milton. Ed. Darbishire, Helen. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. The Analogy of The Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Patrides, C. A.The Cessation of the Oracles: The History of a Legend.” Modern Language Review 60 (1965):500–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, F. T. The Italian Element in Milton's Verse. Oxford: Clarendon, 1954.Google Scholar
Rajan, Balachandra. The Lofty Rhyme: A Study of Milton's Major Poetry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar
Ryken, Leland. The Apocalyptic Vision in Paradise Lost. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, George. A History of English Prosody. 3 vols. London: Macmillan, 1906.Google Scholar
Shuster, G. N. The English Ode from Milton to Keats. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Smith, Hallett. “The Use of Convention in Spenser's Minor Poetry.” In Form and Convention in the Poetry of Edmund Spenser. Ed. Nelson, William. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1961, 122–45.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. Minor Poems. Ed. Osgood, Charles Grosvenor and Lotspeich, Henry Gibbons. 2 vols. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. Poetical Works. Ed. Smith, J. C. and De Selincourt, E. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1916.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. Classical and Christian Ideas of World Harmony. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Tuve, Rosemund. Images and Themes in Five Poems by Milton. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Vergil. Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid 1–6. Trans. Fairclough, H. B. Loeb Classical Library. London: Harvard Univ. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar. Pagan Mysteries of the Renaissance. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph Anthony Jr.‘A Poet amongst Poets’: Milton and the Tradition of Prophecy.” In Milton and the Line of Vision. Ed. Wittreich, Joseph Anthony Jr. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1975, 97142.Google Scholar