Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T16:51:22.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advantage, Affect, History, Henry V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Donald Hedrick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shakespeare's Henry V explores historiographic moments—relations among past, present, and future in memory, writing, and action. Advantage, Shakespeare's early capitalist term for highest return from least outlay, links historiography to war work, theater work, and love, theorized as “affective labor.” The play figures history not so much as fiction but rather in Walter Benjamin's terms as an achievement depending on the epistemic reliability of disadvantaged historians in danger, who rescue or recruit the dead and maximize affect. Falstaff's reported death reveals, through his friends' dispute about his dying words, Elizabethan and contemporary issues of history and shows lowliest characters with an unofficial authority appropriated also by Shakespeare's epilogue. In the controversial final scene, in which Henry woos the defeated French princess, circumstances and subtle conversational play show the labor of potential love—or hate. Henry is less successful, Catherine less victimized than they are usually interpreted to be, as she becomes the underdog Henry was before his victory, her body as mother in potentia constituting a dangerous future counterhistory and means by which domination may be dominated.

Type
Special Topic: Imagining History
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 3: Special Topic: Imagining History , May 2003 , pp. 470 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agnew, Jean-Christophe. Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought 1550–1750. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Alteri, Joanne. “Romance in Henry V.” Studies in English Literature 21 (1981): 223–40.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar
Bahti, Timothy. Allegories of History: Literary Historiography after Hegel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michele. Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis. London: Verso, 1980.Google Scholar
Barton, [Righter] Ann. “The King Disguised: Shakespeare's Henry V and the Comical Histories.” The Triple Bond: Plays, Mainly Shakespearean, in Performance. Ed. Price, Joseph G. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1975. 92–117.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., and Hastings, Stephen. “Distortions of Collective Memory: How Groups Flatter and Deceive Themselves.” Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives. Ed. Pennebaker, James W., Paez, Dario, and Rimé, Bernard. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1997. 277–93.Google Scholar
Becker, Carl L. Everyman His Own Historian: Essays on History and Politics. New York: Monthly Review, 1971.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar
Blanpied, John W. Time and the Artist in Shakespeare's English Histories. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1983.Google Scholar
Blundeville, Thomas. The True Order and Methode of Wryting and Reading of Hystories. [1574]. Ed. Hans Peter Heinrich. Frankfurt: Lang, 1986.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Bourne, William. The Art of Shooting in Great Ordnance. London, 1587.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre. Ed. Willett, John. New York: Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
Breisach, Ernest. Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern. 1983. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.Google Scholar
Brown, Sylvia. “‘Over Her Dead Body’: Feminism, Post-structuralism, and the Mother's Legacy.” Discontinuities: New Essays on Renaissance Literature and Criticism. Ed. Comensoli, Viviana and Stevens, Paul. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1998. 3–26.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. Drama and the Market in the Age of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, Geoffrey, ed. Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare. Vol. 4. New York: Columbia UP, 1962.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. Attitudes toward History. New York: Beacon, 1961.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Renaissance Sense of the Past. London: Arnold, 1969.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare's Histories: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy. San Marino: Huntington Lib., 1947.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Writing of History. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Champion, Larry S. Perspectives in Shakespeare's English Histories. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1980.Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda. Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Ed. Rapoport, Anatol. Baltimore: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sande. Passive Nihilism: Cultural Historiography and the Rhetorics of Scholarship. New York: St. Martin's, 1998.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon, 1951.Google Scholar
Connerton, Paul. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danson, Lawrence. “Henry V: King, Chorus, and Critics.” Shakespeare Quarterly 31 (1983): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur. Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon, and Starn, Randolph. Introduction. Representations 26 (1989): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Leonard F. Tudor Theories of History Writing. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1947.Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Wo men's Oppression. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1984.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Ellis-Fermor, Una. The Frontiers of Drama. London: Methuen, 1945.Google Scholar
The Famous Victories of Henry the Fifth. 1598. Bullough 299–343.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Arthur B. Clio Unbound: Perception of the Social and Cultural Past in Renaissance England. Durham: Duke UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” Language, Counter-memory, Practice. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977. 139–64.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “An Autobiographical Study.” Freud Reader. Ed. Gay, Peter. New York: Norton, 1989. 3–41.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Observations on Transference Love.” Freud Reader. Ed. Gay, Peter. New York: Norton, 1989. 378–87.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Fools of Time: Studies in Shakespearian Tragedy. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1967.Google Scholar
Goldman, Michael. Shakespeare and the Energies of Drama. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossman, Lionel. Between History and Literature. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and Its Subversion, Henry IV and Henry V. Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Ed. Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 18–47.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice. On Collective Memory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, Richard. The Poetics of Primitive Accumulation: English Renaissance Culture and the Genealogy of Capital. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Hardt, and Negri, Antonio. Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994.Google Scholar
Hart, Jonathan. Theater and World: The Problematics of Shakespeare's History Plays. Boston: Northeastern UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Donald. “Flower Power: Shakespearean Deep Bawdy and the Botanical Perverse.” The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere. Ed. Burt, Richard. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. 83–105.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Donald. “Male Surplus Value.” Renaissance Drama 31 (2002): 85–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, Donald. “War Is Mud: Branagh's Dirty Harry V and the Types of Political Ambiguity.” Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video. Ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London: Routledge, 1997. 45–66.Google Scholar
Donald, Hedrick, and Reynolds, Bryan. “Shakespeare and Transversal Power.” Shakespeare without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital. Ed. Hedrick, and Reynolds, . New York: Palgrave, 2000. 3–47.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. The End Crowns All: Closure and Contradiction in Shakespeare's History. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderness, Graham. Shakespeare's History. New York: St. Martin's, 1985.Google Scholar
Holinshed, Ralph. The Third Volume of the Chronicles of England, Ireland, and Scotland. Bullough 376–408.Google Scholar
Howard, Jean. The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Jean, Howard, and Rackin, Phyllis. Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare's English Histories. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. “The Housewife and the Humanists.” Feminism and Renaissance Studies. Ed. Hutson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999. 82–105.Google Scholar
James, I. Basilikon Doron. [1599]. Menton: Scolar, 1969.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Radicalizing Radical Shakespeare: The Permanent Revolution in Shakespeare Studies.” Materialist Shakespeare: A History. Ed. Kamps, Ivo. London: Verso, 1995. 320–28.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. Reading Shakespeare Historically. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Joceline, Elizabeth. The Mothers Legacie to Her Unborne Childe. London, 1624.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert C. These Valiant Dead: Renewing the Past in Shakespeare's Histories. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1991.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957.Google Scholar
Knights, L. C. Drama and Society in the Age of Jonson. London: Chatto, 1937.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. Ranke: The Meaning of History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1977.Google Scholar
Dominick, LaCapra. Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Leinwand, Theodore B. Theatre, Finance, and Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, F. J. Tudor Historical Thought. San Marino: Huntington Lib., 1967.Google Scholar
Loehlin, James N. Henry V. Shakespeare in Performance. London: Manchester UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Nicholas. The Art of War. Ed. Henley, W. E. Vol. 1. London: Nutt, 1905.Google Scholar
Claire, McEachern. “Henry V and the Paradox of the Body Politic.” Materialist Shakespeare: A History. Ed. Kamps, Ivo. London: Verso, 1995. 292–319.Google Scholar
Claire, McEachern. Introduction. Henry V. By William Shakespeare. New York: Penguin, 1999. xxvi–xxxviii.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1991.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “The Use and Abuse of History.” German Essays on History. Ed. Sältzer, Rolf. New York: Continuum, 1991. 174–94.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Robert. A Kingdom for a State: The Achievement of Shakespeare's History Plays. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1972.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar
Pierce, Robert B. Shakespeare's History Plays: The Family and the State. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Poole, Kristen. “‘The Fittest Closet for All Goodness’: Authorial Strategies of Jacobean Mothers' Manuals.” SEL 35 (1995): 69–88.Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph. The Drama of Speech Acts: Shakespeare's Lancastrian Tetralogy. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Moody E. The Drama of Power: Studies in Shakespeare's History Plays. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. Stages of History: Shakespeare's English Chronicles. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. “Preface to the First Edition of Histories of the Latin and Germanic Nations.” German Essays in History. Ed. Sältzer, Rolf. New York: Continuum, 1991. 88–90.Google Scholar
Reese, M. M. The Cease of Majesty: A Study of Shakespeare's History Plays. London: Arnold, 1961.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Bryan. Becoming Criminal: Transversal Performance and Cultural Dissidence in Early Modern England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Roach, Joseph. “History, Memory, Necrophilia.” The Ends of Performance. Ed. Phelan, Peggy and Lane, Jill. New York: New York UP, 1998. 23–30.Google Scholar
Rosen, Steven. “War Power and the Willingness to Suffer.” Peace, War, and Numbers. Ed. Russett, Bruce M. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972. 167–84.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. “Fantasy Echo: History and the Construction of Identity.” Critical Inquiry 27 (2001): 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Henry the Fifth 1600 [first quarto]. Shakespeare Quarto Facsimiles. Oxford: Clarendon, 1957.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare, Based on the Oxford Edition. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
Gerald, Sider, and Smith, Gavin. Between History and Histories: The Making of Silences and Commemorations. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1977.Google Scholar
Sinfield, Alan. Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissident Reading. Berkeley: U of California P, 1992.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Emma, ed. King Henry V. By William Shakespeare. Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. “Domestic Labour and Marx's Theory of Value.” Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. Ed. Kuhn, Annette and Wolpe, AnnMarie. London: Routledge, 1978.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex, and Marriage in England, 1500–1800. New York: Harper, 1977.Google Scholar
Streuver, Nancy S. The Language of History in the Renaissance: Rhetoric and Historical Consciousness in Florentine Humanism: Princeton: Princeton UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare's Genres. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan. Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of Consumer Society in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.Google Scholar
Traversi, Derek. Shakespeare, from Richard II to Henry V. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1957.Google Scholar
Walch, Günther. “Henry V as Working-House of Ideology.” Shakespeare Survey 40 (1988): 63–68.Google Scholar
White, Hayden V. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Wikander, Matthew H. The Play of Truth and State: Historical Drama from Shakespeare to Brecht. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Lance. “Katharine of France as Victim and Bride.” Shakespeare Studies 17 (1985): 61–76.Google Scholar
Williamson, Marilyn. “The Courtship of Katherine and the Second Tetralogy.” Criticism 17 (1975): 326–34.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda. Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540–1620. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1986.Google Scholar
Woolf, D. R. The Idea of History in Early Stuart England: Erudition, Ideology, and “the Light of Truth” from the Accession of James I to the Civil War. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1990.Google Scholar
Woolf, D. R. Reading History in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar