Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:45:00.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physicochemical and nutritional evaluation of Spanish melon landraces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2015

Sandra Escribano  and
Almudena Lázaro
Sandra Escribano
Affiliation:
IMIDRA (Madrilean Research Institute for Rural Development, Agriculture and Food), A-II, Km 38.2, 28800Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Almudena Lázaro*
Affiliation:
IMIDRA (Madrilean Research Institute for Rural Development, Agriculture and Food), A-II, Km 38.2, 28800Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: almudena.lazaro@madrid.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of unknown and therefore unexploited genetic material from landraces and wild relatives could be essential to help modern plant breeders to respond to ongoing requirements and new challenges in food production. The present study evaluates the most relevant physicochemical values and nutrient contents of a genetically unique array of traditional melon varieties, cultivated in Spain at least since the 19th century, and compares them with modern melon hybrids available on the market. This research is complemented with an assessment of variety, environment and repetition effects on each trait to determine their stability. Spanish melon landraces displayed extraordinary diversity with respect to juiciness (70.59–95.97 g/100 g water fresh weight), firmness (20.75–149.89 N), soluble solids content (9.57–16.53 °Brix), pH (5.04–6.38), total sugars (360.21–877.36 mg/g dry weight), carotenoids (0.01–2.05 μg/g fresh weight) and ascorbic acid values (7.55–44.33 mg/100 g fresh weight). A subset of these landraces, belonging to Piel de Sapo and Rochet market classes, revealed remarkably superior values of ascorbic acid in comparison with all commercial varieties, doubling ascorbic acid values with respect to their corresponding market class. Furthermore, most of these landraces exhibited high acidity and accumulated high levels of sugars, fulfilling those sensory and physicochemical characteristics that researchers and breeders have spent many years seeking. The possibilities of these landraces to be used in improvement projects are innumerable; they should be surely taken into account in the near future.

Keywords

ascorbic acidCucumis melo L.diversityjuicinessnutritionsugars
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

† Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, 3012 Wickson Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95 616, USA.

References

Boulton, G, Corrigan, V and Lill, R (1997) Objective method for estimating sensory response to juiciness in apples. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 25: 283–289.Google Scholar
Burger, Y and Schaffer, AA (2007) The contribution of sucrose metabolism enzymes to sucrose accumulation in Cucumis melo . Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 132: 704–712.Google Scholar
Burger, Y, Saar, U, Katzir, N, Paris, HS, Yeselson, Y, Levin, I and Schaffer, AA (2002) A single recessive gene for sucrose accumulation in Cucumis melo fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 127: 938–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Y, Katzir, N, Tzuri, G, Portnoy, V, Saar, U, Shriber, S, Perl-Treves, R and Cohen, R (2003 a) Variation in the response of melon genotypes to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp melonis race 1 determined by inoculation tests and molecular markers. Plant Pathology 52: 204–211.Google Scholar
Burger, Y, Sa'ar, U, Distelfeld, A, Katzir, N, Yeselson, Y, Shen, S and Schaffer, AA (2003 b) Development of sweet melon (Cucumis melo) genotypes combining high sucrose and organic acid content. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128: 537–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Y, Yeselson, L, Sa'ar, U, Paris, HS, Katzir, N, Tadmor, Y and Schaffer, AA (2004) Screening of melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm for consistently high sucrose content and for high ascorbic acid content. In: Lebeda, A and Paris, HS (eds) Progress in Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding Research. Proceedings of Cucurbitaceae 2004, the 8th EUCARPIA Meeting on Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 12–17 July 2004. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University Press, pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
Burger, Y, Sa'ar, U, Paris, HS, Lewinsohn, E, Katzir, N, Tadmor, Y and Schaffer, AA (2006) Genetic variability for valuable fruit quality traits in Cucumis melo . Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 54: 233–242.Google Scholar
Burger, Y, Tadmor, Y, Lewinsohn, E, Meir, A, Sa'ar, U, Katzir, N, Paris, HS and Schaffer, AA (2008) Melon fruit color: more than just looks. In: Pitrat, M (ed.) Cucurbitaceae 2008: Proceedings of the IXth Eucarpia Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae, pp. 529–533. Avignon, (France), 21–24th May 2008. Google Scholar
Burlingame, B and Dernini, S (2012) Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research and Action. Rome, Italy: FAO Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division.Google Scholar
Code of European Community Regulations(2001) Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. No. 1615/2001.Google Scholar
Dhillon, NPS, Ranjana, R, Singh, K, Eduardo, I, Monforte, AJ, Pitrat, M, Dhillon, NK and Singh, PP (2007) Diversity among landraces of Indian snapmelon (Cucumis melo var. momordica). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 1267–1283.Google Scholar
Escribano, S and Lázaro, A (2009) Agro-morphological diversity of Spanish traditional melons (Cucumis melo L.) of the Madrid provenance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, S and Lázaro, A (2012) Sensorial characteristics of Spanish traditional melon genotypes: has the flavor of melon changed in the last century? European Food Research and Technology 234: 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, S, Sanchez, FJ and Lázaro, A (2010) Establishment of a sensory characterization protocol for melon (Cucumis melo L.) and its correlation with physical-chemical attributes: indications for future genetic improvements. European Food Research and Technology 231: 611–621.Google Scholar
Escribano, S, Lázaro, A, Cuevas, HE, Lopez-Sese, AI and Staub, JE (2012) Spanish melons (Cucumis melo L.) of the Madrid provenance: a unique germplasm reservoir. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59: 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallik, E, Shalom, Y, Alkalai-Tuvia, S, Larkov, O, Brandeis, E and Ravid, U (2005) External, internal and sensory traits in Galia-type melon treated with different waxes. Postharvest Biology and Technology 36: 69–75.Google Scholar
Fanzo, J, Holmes, M, Junega, P, Musinguzi, E, Smith, IF, Ekesa, B and Bergamini, N (2011) Improving nutrition with agricultural biodiversity. A manual on implementing food systems field projects to assess and improve dietary diversity, and nutrition and health outcomes. Biodiversity International. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Frechilla-Manso, S (1994) Influencia de la nutrición nitrogenada en la respuesta de Pisum sativum L. al déficit hídrico. Universidad de Navarra..Google Scholar
Gajc-Wolska, J, Szwacka, M, Malepszy, S 2001. Evaluation of transgenic lines of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) with gene of thaumatin. Veg Crop Res Bull 54(2):5–9.Google Scholar
Harlander, S (1993) Genetic-engineering of foods – a United-States perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology 4: 301–305.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E, Ulrich, D, Schulz, H, Tuvia-Alkali, S and Fallik, E (2003) Sensory and quality analysis of different melon cultivars after prolonged storage. Nahrung/Food 47: 320–324.Google Scholar
Hodges, DM and Lester, GE (2006) Comparisons between orange- and green-fleshed non-netted and orange-fleshed netted muskmelons: antioxidant changes following different harvest and storage periods. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131: 110–117.Google Scholar
INIA (1977) “El Encín” Suelo y clima. Madrid, Spain: Dpto de Ecología, CRIDA 06 (Tajo).Google Scholar
Katzir, N, Harel-Beja, R, Portnoy, V, Tzuri, G, Koren, E, Lev, S, Bar, E, Tadmor, Y, Burger, J, Lewinsohn, E, Fei, Z, Giovannoni, J and Schaffer, A (2008) Melon fruit quality: a genomic approach. In: Pitrat, M (ed.) Cucurbitaceae 2008, Proceedings of the IXth EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae, Avignon (France), 21–24th May 2008 , pp. 231–240.Google Scholar
Kubicki, B (1962) Inheritance of some characters in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Genetica Polonica 3: 265–274.Google Scholar
Lester, G (2006) Consumer preference quality attributes of melon fruits. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 712: 175–182. Available at http://www.actahort.org/books/712/712_17.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, GE (2008) Antioxidant, sugar, mineral, and phytonutrient concentrations across edible fruit tissues of orange-fleshed honeydew melon (Cucumis melo L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56: 3694–3698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lester, G and Shellie, KC (1992) Postharvest sensory and physicochemical attributes of honey dew melon fruits. HortScience 27: 1012–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, GE and Eischen, F (1996) Beta-carotene content of postharvest orange-fleshed muskmelon fruit: effect of cultivar, growing location and fruit size. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 49: 191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lester, GE and Hodges, DM (2008) Antioxidants associated with fruit senescence and human health: novel orange-fleshed non-netted honey dew melon genotype comparisons following different seasonal productions and cold storage durations. Postharvest Biology and Technology 48: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, GE, Mon, JL and Makus, DJ (2006) Supplemental foliar potassium applications with or without a surfactant can enhance netted muskmelon quality. HortScience 41: 741–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenthaler, HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids – pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148: 350–382.Google Scholar
Mallick, MFR and Masui, M (1986) Origin, distribution and taxonomy of melons. Scientia Horticulturae 28: 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, S (2011) US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, January 2011. Advances in Nutrition 2: 293–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuez, F, Prohens, J and Blanca, JM (2004) Relationships origin, and diversity of Galapagos tomatoes: implications for the conservation of natural populations. American Journal of Botany 91: 86–99.Google Scholar
Obando-Ulloa, JM, Eduardo, I, Monforte, AJ and Fernandez-Trujillo, JP (2009) Identification of QTLs related to sugar and organic acid composition in melon using near-isogenic lines. Scientia Horticulturae 121: 425–433.Google Scholar
Pardo, JE, Alvarruiz, A, Varon, R and Gomez, R (2000) Quality evaluation of melon cultivars. Correlation among physical-chemical and sensory parameters. Journal of Food Quality 23: 161–170.Google Scholar
Pfendt, LB, Vukasinovic, VL, Blagojevic, NZ and Radojevic, MP (2003) Second order derivative spectrophotometric method for determination of vitamin C content in fruits, vegetables and fruit juices. European Food Research and Technology 217: 269–272.Google Scholar
Pitrat, M (2002) Gene list for melon. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 25: 76–93.Google Scholar
Pitrat, M, Hanelt, P and Hammer, K (2000) Some comments on infraspecific classification of cultivars of melon. Proceedings of the 5th International Postharvest Symposium 1–3: 29–36.Google Scholar
Saftner, R, Abbott, JA, Lester, G and Vinyard, B (2006 a) Sensory and analytical comparison of orange-fleshed honeydew to cantaloupe and green-fleshed honeydew for fresh-cut chunks. Postharvest Biology and Technology 42: 150–160.Google Scholar
Saftner, R, Lester, G and Abbott, JA (2006 b) Fresh-cut chunks of a new orange-fleshed melon genotype: analytical and sensory comparisons to its inbred parents, and to commercial cantaloupe and green-fleshed honeydew harvested in winter. HortScience 41: 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuch, W, Kanczler, J, Robertson, D, Hobson, G, Tucker, G, Grierson, D, Bright, S and Bird, C (1991) Fruit-quality characteristics of transgenic tomato fruit with altered polygalacturonase activity. HortScience 26: 1517–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepansky, A, Kovalski, I, Schaffer, AA and Perl-Treves, R (1999) Variation in sugar levels and invertase activity in mature fruit representing a broad spectrum of Cucumis melo genotypes. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 53–62.Google Scholar
Szczesniak, AS and Ilker, R (1988) The meaning of textural characteristics – juiciness in plant foodstuffs. Journal of Texture Studies 19: 61–78.Google Scholar
Tang, M, Bie, ZL, Wu, MZ, Yi, HP and Feng, JX (2010) Changes in organic acids and acid metabolism enzymes in melon fruit during development. Scientia Horticulturae 123: 360–365.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Escribano supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Escribano supplementary material(File)
File 25.2 KB