Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T19:19:27.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Participatory tree selection and fruit morphological characterization of Phoebe cooperiana (U.N Kanjilal ex A. Das) in the Eastern Himalayas of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2023

Jasmine Pabin
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh – 791102, India
Nicolee Lyngdoh*
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Research Centre, Mizoram University, Tanhril, Aizawl, Mizoram – 796 004, India
Shivani Dobhal
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh – 791102, India
Kalidas Upadhyaya
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Tanhril, Aizawl, Mizoram – 796 004, India
Mongjam Bishwapati Devi
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh – 791102, India
*
Corresponding author: Nicolee Lyngdoh; Email: lyngdoh@gmail.com

Abstract

Selection of desirable phenotypes and characterization of variability in economically important traits are essential for domestication of indigenous fruit trees (IFTs). Currently, participatory tree selection is a widely accepted approach in IFT domestication wherein farmers' knowledge and preferences are included in tree selection processes. In Arunachal Pradesh, India, fruits of Phoebe cooperiana are extensively consumed by people and traded across the state. In this study, we employed a selection index to screen trees for superior fruit traits from a base population of 45 farmer-identified trees of P. cooperiana in Arunachal Pradesh. Based on fruit diameter length ratio, pulp fruit ratio and yield, 19 trees were selected for superior fruit traits. The per cent improvement for 10 fruit and seed traits ranged from 0.16 to 14.56% compared to the base population. Significant variation for all fruit and seed parameters was observed among the 19 trees with coefficient of variation values ranging between 1.92% for fruit diameter and 8.26% for seed weight. There was significant positive association between economic traits including fruit weight with pulp weight, fruit diameter length ratio with fruit weight and pulp thickness with pulp weight. Principal component analysis revealed that variability was largely contributed by fruit weight (0.49), pulp weight (0.46), seed weight (0.45) and fruit diameter (0.42). Cluster analysis grouped phenotypes into seven groups with no clear clustering of individuals from the same area. The study highlights the significance of participatory tree selection approach and the benefits of individual tree selection in capturing wider variation and locating extreme phenotypes in IFT domestication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abasse, T, Weber, JC, Katkore, B, Boureima, M, Larwanou, M and Kalinganiré, A (2011) Morphological variation in Balanites aegyptiaca fruits and seeds within and among parkland agroforests in eastern Niger. Agroforest Systems 81, 5766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9323-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnifesi, FK, Kwesiga, F, Mhango, J, Chilanga, T, Mkonda, A, Kadu, CAC, Kadzere, I, Mithofer, D, Saka, J, Sileshi, GW, Ramadhani, T and Dhilwayo, P (2006) Towards the development of miombo fruit trees as commercial tree crops in southern Africa. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods 16, 103121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2006.9752548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alain, T, Akem, M, Avana, ML, Muchugi, A, Degrande, A, Tchoundjeu, Z, Jamnadass, R and Na'a, F (2020) Tree-to-tree variation in fruits of three population of Trichoscypha acuminata (Engl.) in Cameroon. Scientific African 7, e00235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00235Google Scholar
Anegbeh, PO, Usoro, C, Ukafor, V, Tchoundjeu, Z, Leakey, RRB and Schreckenberg, K (2003) Domestication of Irvingia gabonensis: 3. Phenotypic variation of fruits and kernels in a Nigerian village. AgroforestrySystems 58, 213218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026094021408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atangana, AR (2010) Phenotypic diversity in fruit and seed traits, and neutral genetic diversity in Allanblackia floribunda (PhD thesis). University of Laval, Quebec.Google Scholar
Cotterill, PP and Dean, CA (1990) Successful Tree Breeding with Index Selection. East Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publication, p. 80.Google Scholar
Dhliwayo-Chiunzi, PD, Matimati, I and Kachigunda, B (2014) Identification and selection of superior phenotypes of Uapaca kirkiana Muell Arg. (Euphorbiaceae), a priority indigenous fruit tree of Zimbabwe. International Science & Technology Journal of Namibia 4, 722. http://hdl.handle.net/11070/1304Google Scholar
Dolley, N (2019) Distribution mapping and characterization of fruit parameters of Phoebe cooperiana U.N Kanjilal Ex A. Das in Arunachal Pradesh. M.Sc. (Forestry). Thesis submitted to College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh (India).Google Scholar
Dolley, N, Lyngdoh, N, Devi, MB and Hazarika, BN (2019) Characterization of fruit morphological parameters and effect of pre-sowing treatment in Phoebe cooperiana: an economically important wild edible fruit of Arunachal Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 8, 27042711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262120000210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolley, N, Lyngdoh, N, Singh, S, Singh, MC, Devi, MB and Hazarika, BN (2020) Domestication of Phoebe cooperiana in the Eastern Himalayas: population variation in morphological and biochemical fruit parameters. Plant Genetic Resources 18, 259269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262120000210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinganire, A, Weber, JC, Uwamariya, A and Kone, B (2008) Improving rural livelihoods through domestication of indigenous fruit trees in the parklands of the Sahel. In Akinnifesi, FK, Leakey, RRB, Ajayi, OC, Sileshi, G, Tchoundjeu, Z, Matacala, P and Kwesiga, FR (eds), Indigenous Fruit Trees in the Tropics: Domestication, Utilization and Commercialization. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CAB International Publishing, pp. 186203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, RRB and Page, T (2006) The ‘ideotype’ concept and its application to the selection of cultivars of trees providing agroforestry products. Forests Trees and Livelihoods 16, 516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2006.9752542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, RRB, Atangana, AR, Kengni, E, Waruhiu, AN, Usoro, C, Anegbeh, PO and Tchoundjeu, Z (2002) Domestication of Dacryodes edulis in West and Central Africa: characterization of genetic variation. Forests Trees Livelihoods 12, 5771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2002.9752410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, RRB, Tchoundjeu, Z, Schreckenberg, K, Shackleton, SE and Shackleton, CM (2005) Agroforestry tree products (AFTPs): targeting poverty reduction and enhanced livelihoods. International Journal for Agricultural Sustainability 3, 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805356-0.00013-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyngdoh, N (2015) Documentation, demographic assessment and conservation of wild edible fruit diversity of Arunachal Pradesh. Final Project Report submitted to Science Research and Engineering, New Delhi, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Naseem, S, Muhammad, JJ, Summar, AN and Faisal, SA (2019) Exploitation of diversity in domesticated and wild ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) germplasm for conservation and breeding in Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae 249, 228239.Google Scholar
Pabin, J, Lyngdoh, N, Mehra, TS, Devi, MB and Payum, T (2021) Effect of phytohormones on rooting behaviour in air layers of Phoebe cooperiana, an economically important tree species of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Current Botany 12, 192196. https://doi.org/10.25081/cb.2021.v12.7187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panse, VG and Sukhatme, PV (1985) Statistical methods for agricultural workers, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 359 pp.Google Scholar
Payum, T, Das, AK, Ramashankar, R, Tamuly, C and Hazarika, M (2013) Ethnobotany and antioxidant determination of Phoebe cooperiana fruit – a highly utilized wild fruit in Arunachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 4, 31963201.Google Scholar
Phurailatpam, CS, Lyngdoh, N, Vasudeva, R, Mehra, TS, Devi Mongjamand, B and Momin, KC (2021) Refining tree selection criteria of tree bean (Parkia timoriana (DC.) Merr.) based on farmer knowledge and consumer preference in Manipur, India. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 31, 1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2021.2018361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ræbild, A, Larsen, AS, Jensen, JS, Moussa, O, De Groote, S, Patrick, VD, Jules, B, Boukary, OD, Haby, S, Antoine, K and Erik, DK (2011) Advances in domestication of indigenous fruit trees in the West African Sahel. New Forests 41, 297315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9237-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.1. New York: Exeter Publishing Setauket.Google Scholar
Shinde, PP, Rane, AD, Bhave, SG, Gunaga, R and Narkhede, S (2012) Variability and genotype selection in Callophylluminophyllum for quality fruit yield in the central west coast of India. Journal of Tree Sciences 31, 814.Google Scholar
Simon, AM, Akinnifesi, FK, Mkonda, A, Mhango, J, Chilanga, T, Sileshi, G and Ajayi, OC (2015) Ethnoecological knowledge for identifying elite phenotypes of the indigenous fruit tree, Uapaca kirkiana in the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 39, 399415. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.980486Google Scholar
Simons, AJ and Leakey, RRB (2004) Tree domestication in tropical agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 61, 167181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028997.74147.f9Google Scholar
Thompson, JN (1984) Variation among individual seed masses in Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae) under controlled conditions: magnitude and partitioning of the variance. Ecology 65, 626631. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, CR and Moorthy, BR (1952) Heritable and non-heritable relationship and variability of soil content and agronomic characters in F2 generation of soybean crosses. Agronomy Journal 44, 202209. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400040010xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobel, B and Talber, J (1984) Applied Forest tree improvement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 506 pp. ISBN-10 0471096822, ISBN-13 987-0471096825.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pabin et al. supplementary material 1
Download undefined(File)
File 608.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pabin et al. supplementary material 2
Download undefined(File)
File 45.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pabin et al. supplementary material 3
Download undefined(File)
File 2.5 MB