Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:21:44.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic diversity and stability analysis of sweet potato accessions of north-eastern India grown under the mid-hill conditions of Meghalaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Veerendra Kumar Verma Open the ORCID record for Veerendra Kumar Verma [Opens in a new window] ,
Amit Kumar ,
Heiplanmi Rymbai Open the ORCID record for Heiplanmi Rymbai [Opens in a new window] ,
Hammylliende Talang ,
M. Bilashini Devi ,
Pankaj Baiswar  and
S. Hazarika
Veerendra Kumar Verma*
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
Amit Kumar
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
Heiplanmi Rymbai
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
Hammylliende Talang
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
M. Bilashini Devi
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
Pankaj Baiswar
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
S. Hazarika
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam-793103, Meghalaya, India
*
Corresponding author: Veerendra Kumar Verma; Email: verma.veerendra@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 32 sweet potato genotypes were evaluated to assess the genetic diversity based on quantitative traits and molecular markers, as well as stability for yield and related traits. Wider variability was observed for the traits like vine length (181.2–501.3 cm), number of leaves/plant (103.0–414.0 cm), internodal length (3.20–14.80 cm), petiole length (6.5–21.3 cm), leaf length (8.50–14.5 cm), leaf breadth (8.20–15.30 cm), leaf area (42.50–115.62 cm2), tuber length (7.77–18.07 cm), tuber diameter (2.67–6.90 cm), tuber weight (65.60–192.09 g), tuber yield (7.77–28.87 t ha−1), dry matter (27.34–36.41%), total sugar (4.50–5.70%) and starch (18.50–29.92%) content. Desirable traits such as tuber yield, dry matter and starch content have shown high heritability (>60%) with moderate to high genetic advance. Under molecular analysis, a total of 232 alleles were observed from all 32 microsatellite markers, which ranged from 4 to 14 with an average of 7.77 alleles per locus. In the population, the average observed heterozygosity (0.51) was higher than the expected heterozygosity (0.49). The contribution of genotype, genotype by environment interaction to the total variations was found to be significant. Based on the multi-trait stability index (tuber length, tuber diameter, tuber weight and tuber yield), genotypes X-24, MLSPC-3, MLSPC-5, ARSPC-1 and TSP-12-12 were found to be most stable. Among them, the high-yielding and stable genotypes TSP-12-10 (26.0 t ha−1) and MLSPC-3 (23.9 t ha−1) can be promoted for commercial production or used as parental material in future crop improvement programmes.

Keywords

genetic diversityheterozygosity and selectionstabilitysweet potatoyield
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2023 , pp. 537 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afuape, S (2014) Multivariate assessment of the agro morphological variability and yield components among sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) landraces. African Journal of Plant Science 5, 123–132.Google Scholar
Andrade, MI, Naico, A, Ricardo, J, Eyzaguirre, R, Makunde, GS, Ortiz, R and Gruneberg, WJ (2016) Genotype × environment interaction and selection for drought adaptation in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) in Mozambique. Euphytica 209, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, NL, Robles, R, Rossel, G, Alagon, R, Panta, A, Jarret, RL, Manrique, N and Ellis, D (2021) Genetic identity, diversity, and population structure of CIP's sweet potato (I. batatas) germplasm collection. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 660012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous (2018) Horticultural Statistics at a Glance 2018. Available at https://agricoop.gov.in/sites/default/files/Horticulture%20Statistics%20at%20a%20Glance-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2022) Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2022. Available at https://agricoop.gov.in/Documents/CWWGDATA/Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Baafi, E, Gracen, VE, Blay, ET, Ofori, K, Manu-Aduening, J and Carey, EE (2015) Evaluation of sweet potato accessions for end-user preferred traits improvement. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 4632–4645.Google Scholar
Burton, GW and Devane, EH (1953) Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundanacea) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 45, 478–481. doi: 10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, SP, Singh, J, Panigrahi, T and Thakur, P (2015) Correlation and path analysis in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam]. Plant Archives 15, 695–699.Google Scholar
Dewey, DR and Lu, KH (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested grass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51, 515–518. doi: 10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, TG (1952) Nature and origin of heterosis. In Gowen, JW (ed.), Heterosis. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State College Press, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19, 11–15.Google Scholar
Fisher, R (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, HG (2013) A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53, 1860–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gichuru, V, Aritua, V, Lubega, GW, Edema, R, Adipula, E and Rubaihayo, PR (2006) A preliminary analysis of diversity among East African sweet potato landraces using morphological and simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. Acta Horticulturae 703, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves Neto, AC, Maluf, WR, Gomes, LAA, Maciel, GM, Ferreira, RPD and Carvalho, RC (2012) Correlaçãoen tre caracteres e estimação de parâmetros populacionais para batata-doce. Horticultura Brasileira 30, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafius, JE (1959) Heterosis in barley. Agronomy Journal 51, 554–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwandu, C, Tairo, F, Mneney, E and Kullaya, A (2012) Characterization of Tanzanian elite sweet potato genotypes for sweet potato virus disease (SPVD) resistance and high dry matter content using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 11, 9582–9590.Google Scholar
Hanson, CH, Robinson, HF and Comstock, RE (1956) Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lespedeza. Agronomy Journal 48, 268–272. doi: 10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800060008xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K, Dunn, DW, Ritland, K and Li, BG (2020) POLYGENE: population genetics analyses for autopolyploids based on allelic phenotypes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11, 448–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, MM, Naznin, S, Naznin, A, Uddin, MN, Amin, MN, Rahman, MM, Tipu, MMH, Alsuhaibani, AM, Gaber, A and Ahmed, S (2022) Dry matter, starch content, reducing sugar, color and crispiness are key parameters of potatoes required for chip processing. Horticulturae 8, 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, HW, Robinson, HF and Comstcock, RE (1955) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal 47, 314–318. doi: 10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinowski, ST, Wagner, AP and Taper, ML (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karuri, HW, Ateka, EM, Amata, R, Nyende, AB, Muigai, AWT, Mwasame, E and Gichuki, ST (2010) Evaluating diversity among Kenyan sweet potato genotypes using morphological and SSR markers. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 12, 33–38.Google Scholar
Kivuva, BM, Githiri, SM, Yencho, GC and Sibiya, J (2014) Genotype × environment interaction for storage root yield in sweet potato under managed drought stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, WS, Pavan, BE, Matos Filho, CHA, Alcantara Neto, F, Oliveira, CB and Feitosa, FS (2016) Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos, correlações e índices de seleção para seis caracteres agronomic osemlinhagens F8 de soja. Comunicata Scientiae 7, 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, CEC, Souza, B, Manfio, CE, Wamser, GH, Alves, DP and de Francisco, A (2022) Sweet potato new varieties screening based on morphology, pulp color, proximal composition, and total dietary fiber content via factor analysis and principal component analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 852709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantel, N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27, 209–220.Google Scholar
Mekonnen, B, Gedebo, A and Gurmu, F (2020) Characters association and path coefficient analysis of orange fleshed sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] genotypes evaluated in Hawassa, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 12, 292–298.Google Scholar
Mustamu, YA, Tjintokohadi, K, Grüneberg, WJ, Karuniawan, A and Ruswandi, D (2018) Selection of superior genotype of sweet-potato in Indonesia based on stability and adaptability. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 78, 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidoo, SIM, Laurie, SM, Amelework, AB, Shimelis, H and Laing, M (2022) Selection of sweet potato parental genotypes using simple sequence repeat markers. Plants 11, 1802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nair, AG, Vidya, P, Ambu, V, Sreekumar, J and Mohan, C (2017) Genetic diversity studies in cultivated sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] revealed by simple sequence repeat markers. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research 7, 33–48.Google Scholar
Narasimha Murthy, PN, Patel, NB, Kapadia, C, Desai, KD and Koteswara Rao, G (2021) Genetic diversity analysis of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] germplasms through RAPD and ISSR markers. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 50, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M, Tajima, F and Tateno, Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivoto, T and Lúcio, ADC (2020) Metan: an R package for multi environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11, 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivoto, T and Nardino, M (2021) MGIDI: toward an effective multivariate selection in biological experiments. Bioinformatics 37, 1383–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivoto, T, Lúcio, AD, da Silva, JA, Marchioro, VS, de Souza, VQ and Jost, E (2019) Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal 111, 2949–2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otoboni, MEF, de Oliveira, DJLSF, Vargas, PB, Pavan, BE and Andrade, MI (2020) Genetic parameters and gain from selection in sweet potato genotypes with high beta-carotene content. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 20, e31632038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozias-Akins, P and Jarret, RL (1994) Nuclear DNA content and ploidy levels in the genus Ipomoea. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119, 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paliwal, P, Jain, D, Joshi, A, Ameta, KD, Chaudhary, R and Singh, A (2020) Diversity analysis of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) genotypes using morphological, biochemical and molecular markers. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 58, 276–285.Google Scholar
Panse, VG and Sukhatme, PV (1978) Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, 2nd Edition. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Prakash, CS and He, G (1996) DNA marker-based genetic relatedness in United States sweet potato cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 1059–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchase, JL, Hatting, H and Vandeventer, CS (2000) Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) in South Africa. II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangana, S (1986) Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd, pp. 190–210.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Bonilla, L, Cuevas, HE, Montero-Rojas, M, Bird-Pico, F and Luciano-Rosario, D (2014) Assessment of genetic diversity of sweet potato in Puerto Rico. PLoS ONE 9, e116184. doi: 10.1371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roullier, C, Kambouo, R, Paofa, J, McKey, DB and Lebot, V (2013) On the origin of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) genetic diversity in New Guinea, a secondary center of diversity. Heredity 110, 594–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, SN (2000) Genetic studies in sweet potato genotypes under stress conditions. American Journal of Potato Research 155, 1453–1465.Google Scholar
Sneller, CH, Kilgore-Norquest, L and Dombek, D (1997) Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Science 37, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsegaye, E, Sastry, EVD and Nigussie, D (2006) Correlation and path analysis in sweet potato and their implications for clonal selection. Journal of Agronomy 5, 391–395.Google Scholar
Tumwegamire, S, Rubaihayo, PR, LaBoonte, DR, Diaz, F and Kapinga, R (2011) Genetic diversity in white- and orange-fleshed sweet potato farmer varieties from east Africa evaluated by simple sequence repeat markers. Crop Science 51, 1132–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z, Li, J, Luo, Z, Huang, L, Chen, X, Fang, B, Li, Y, Chen, J and Zhang, X (2011) Characterization and development of EST-derived SSR markers in cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). BMC Plant Biology 11, 139. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/11/139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yada, B, Tukamuhabwa, P, Wajala, B, Kim, DJ and Skilton, RA (2010) Characterizing Ugandan sweet potato germplasm using fluorescent labeled simple sequence repeat markers. Horticultural Science 45, 225–230.Google Scholar
Yang, X-S, Su, W-J, Wang, L-J, Lei, J, Chai, S-S and Liu, Q-C (2015) Molecular diversity and genetic structure of 380 sweet potato accessions as revealed by SSR markers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zali, H, Farshadfar, E, Sabaghpour, SH and Karimizadeh, R (2012) Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annals of Biological Research 3, 3126–3136.Google Scholar
Zhang, DP, Carbajulca, D, Ojeda, L, Rossel, G, Milla, S, Herrera, C and Ghislain, M (1999) Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in sweet potato varieties from Latin America. CIP Program Report 1999–2000. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, 295–301.Google Scholar
Zhang, DP, Cervantes, JC, Huamàn, Z, Carey, E and Ghislain, M (2000) Assessing genetic diversity of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) cultivars from tropical America using AFLP. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47, 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Verma et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 1.4 MB