Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:25:36.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic diversity analysis of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) using AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2008

Rouxlene Coetzee ,
Liezel Herselman  and
Maryke T. Labuschagne
Rouxlene Coetzee
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein9300, South Africa
Liezel Herselman
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein9300, South Africa
Maryke T. Labuschagne*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein9300, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: labuscm.sci@ufs.ac.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nineteen kenaf genotypes from Cuba, Taiwan, the USA, El Salvador, Guatemala, Russia, Spain and Indonesia, and three wild types collected in South Africa were analysed for genetic diversity using AFLP analysis. All could be uniquely distinguished from one another, but only a low level of genetic diversity was present. The most distinct accession, Guatemala 4, was 85% similar to all other accessions. The accessions clustered more or less according to known pedigree and/or origin. Two of the three wild types (Hibiscus cannabinus c and H. cannabinus a) clustered separately from the commercial and Russian accessions. One of the wild types, H. cannabinus b clustered with some of the commercial accessions. Commercial accessions in the first subgroup all originated from central and North America, and surrounding islands (Cuba and El Salvador). The Russian accessions are all grouped together. The second subgroup was the only group that contained accessions from different geographical origins.

Keywords

DNA fingerprintingfibremolecular characterization
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 122 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, BS, Hollowell, JE, Mosley, JW and Cossar, RD (2006) Registration of ‘Whitten’ kenaf. Crop Science 46: 988–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Z, Lu, B, Baldwin, BS, Sameshima, K and Chen, J (2002) Comparative studies of genetic diversity in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) varieties based on agronomic and RAPD data. Hereditas 136: 231–239.Google Scholar
Cheng, Z, Lu, B, Sameshima, K, Fu, D and Chen, J (2004) Identification and genetic relationships of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) germplasm revealed by AFLP analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 393–401.Google Scholar
Cook, CG and Scott, AW (1995) Registration of ‘SF459’ kenaf. Crop Science 35: 1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, CG and Scott, AW (2000 a) Registration of ‘Dowling’ kenaf. Crop Science 40: 1831.Google Scholar
Cook, CG and Scott, AW (2000 b) Registration of ‘Gregg’ kenaf. Crop Science 40: 1831–1832.Google Scholar
Crane, JC and Acuna, JB (1945) Growth and development of kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus L., with special reference to the fiber content of the stems. Journal of the American Society for Agronomy 37: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, JM (1975) Fiber Crops. Gainesville: The University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar
Deng, L-Q, Li, J-Q and Li, A-Q (1994) Studies on the agronomic characters of kenaf germplasm and their utilisation. China's Fibre Crops 4: 1–4.Google Scholar
Dice, LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K, Johnstone, C and Thompson, C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349.Google Scholar
LeMahieu, PJ, Oplinger, ES and Putnam, DH (1991) Kenaf. Alternative Field Crops Manual. Available at http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcm/kenaf.html (accessed July 2007)..Google Scholar
Siepe, T, Ventrella, D and Lapenta, E (1997) Evaluation of genetic variability in a collection of Hibiscus cannabinus (L.) and Hibiscus spp (L.). Industrial Crops and Products 6: 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, CS (1998) Kenaf. Available at http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/CropFactSheets/kenaf.html (accessed February 2007)..Google Scholar
USDA ARS, National Genetic Resources Program (2004) Germplasm Resources Information Network – (GRIN)[Online Database] National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, MD. Available at http://www.ars-grin.gov..Google Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, Van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Frijters, A, Pot, J, Peleman, J, Kuiper, M and Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, I (1998) Kenaf: the forgotten fiber crop. The Australian New Crops Newsletter 10. Available at http://www.newcrops.uq.edu.au/newslett/ncn10212.htm (accessed July 1998).Google Scholar