Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:29:58.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the extent of phenotypic diversity among cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) genotypes based on agro-morphological and physicochemical traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2023

Carlos Humberto Aires Matos-Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
José Eduardo Vasconcelos de Carvalho-Junior
Affiliation:
Post-Graduation Program in Agronomy, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
Gérson do Nascimento Costa
Affiliation:
Post-Graduation Program in Agronomy, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
Marcones Ferreira Costa*
Affiliation:
Campus Amílcar Ferreira Sobral, Federal University of Piauí, Floriano, Piauí, Brazil
José Airton Rodrigues Nunes
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Ângela Celis de Almeida Lopes
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
Regina Lucia Ferreira-Gomes
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Marcones Ferreira Costa, E-mail: marconescosta@ufpi.edu.br

Abstract

Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) is cultivated in more than 30 countries because of its economic and nutritional importance. Despite having a significant agronomic role, little is known about the genetic and phenotypic diversity of cashew populations in Brazil. Thus, we aimed to characterize and estimate the diversity among cashew genotypes based on agro-morphological and physicochemical traits, with an objective of selection of varieties for breeding programmes. Forty-three cashew trees were evaluated based on 13 morphological traits and three physicochemical traits. A wide range of variations was recorded for the phenotypic characteristics, including total weight, fruit weight, pseudofruit length, kernel weight and total acidity, suggesting the existence of considerable variations for potential use in breeding programmes. Principal component analysis explained 79.74% of the total variation in the first two principal axes. The dendrogram based on the UPGMA method classified the 43 genotypes into six groups. Groups IV and VI were the most dissimilar, with emphasis on the genotypes 28 and 43, which were observed to be most divergent based on the Euclidean distance matrix (3.054). This makes it possible to select genotypes for hybridization with F1 generation gains. Based on cluster analysis and comparison of means among the six groups, promising genotypes were identified with superior traits, such as fruit weight, pseudofruit length, kernel weight and total acidity. This suggests the importance of phenotypic characterization for cashew breeding programmes. In addition, the observed vast diversity is an important genetic basis for improving cashew yield in northeastern Brazil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adiga, JD, Muralidhara, BM, Preethi, P and Savadi, S (2019) Phenological growth stages of the cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale L.) according to the extended BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology 175, 246252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adu-Gyamfi, PK, Barnnor, M, Akpertey, A and Padi, F (2022) Genetic variability and combining abilities for earliness to nut yield and nut weight in selected cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) clones. International Journal of Fruit Science 22, 539550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinwale, MG, Gregorio, G, Nwilene, F, Akinyele, BO, Ogunbayo, SA and Odiyi, AC (2011) Heritability and correlation coefficient analysis for yield and its components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). African Journal of Plant Science 5, 207212.Google Scholar
Andrade, IM, Nascimento, JDAO, Sousa, MV, Santos, JO and Mayo, SJ (2019) A morphometric study of the restinga ecotype of Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae): wild coastal cashew populations from Piauí, Northeast Brazil. Feddes Repertorium 130, 89116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, ANC (2015) Caracterização genética em germoplasmo de cajuí (Anacardium spp.) por meio de marcadores morfoagronômicos e moleculares ISSR (MSc thesis). Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina.Google Scholar
Borges, ANC, Lopes, ACA, Britto, FB, Vasconcelos, LFL and Lima, PSC (2018) Genetic diversity in a cajuí (Anacardium spp.) germplasm bank as determined by ISSR markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 17, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasil (2013) Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa MAPA 19/2013. Dispõe de padrões de identidade e qualidade de bebida. Available at https://alimentusconsultoria.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/IN-19-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Carneiro, LA, Silva, LS, Gomes, MFC, Santos, MF, Valente, SES, Gomes, RLF and Costa, MF (2019) Morphological characterization and genetic divergence of a cashew population in Floriano, Piauí, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research 18, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipojola, FM, Mwase, WF, Kwapata, MB, Bokosi, JM, Njoloma, JP and Maliro, MF (2009) Morphological characterization of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) in four populations in Malawi. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 51735181.Google Scholar
Cruz, CD (2013) Genes: a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy 35, 271276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, CD, Ferreira, FM and Pessoni, LA (2012) Biometria aplicada ao estudo da diversidade genética, 1st Edn, Vol. 1. Visconde do Rio Branco, Minas Gerais: Editora Suprema Gráfica, 620p.Google Scholar
Damasceno-Júnior, JA and Bezerra, FC (2002) Quality of early dwarf cashew peduncles from plants cultivated under irrigation and different management and spacing systems. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 24, 258262.Google Scholar
Das, I and Arora, A (2017) Post-harvest processing technology for cashew apple – a review. Journal Food Engineering 194, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasmohapatra, R, Rath, S, Pradhan, B and Rout, GR (2014) Molecular and agromorphological assessment of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) genotypes of India. Journal of Applied Horticulture 16, 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehoniyotan, OI and Udo, EOJ (2019) Variation studies of morphological characters of cashew trees (Anacardium occidentale) on Kogi State University Campus, Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 8, 17022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2018) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Freitas, ASD, Dantas, BDS, Araújo, ÍMDS and Garruti, DDS (2020) Suitability of peduncles of new cashew tree clones for commercial purposes. Revista Ciência Agronômica 51, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadissa, F, Tesfaye, K, Dagne, K and Geleta, M (2020) Morphological traits based genetic diversity assessment of Ethiopian potato [Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew] populations from Ethiopia. Genetic Resources Crop Evolution 67, 809829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawerroth, MC, Bordallo, PDN, Oliveira, LCP, Vale, EH, Vidal, FDC and Melo, DS (2019) Genetic variability among cashew hybrids and prediction of superior combinations based on agronomic performance. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 54, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBPGR (1986) Cashew Descriptors. Rome, Italy: International Board for plant Genetic Resources (presently, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute), p. 33.Google Scholar
Instituto Adolfo Lutz (2008) Analytical Standards of the Adolfo Lutz Institute: Physicochemical Methods for Food Analysis. São Paulo, Brazil: IAL, 1020p.Google Scholar
Kahlmann, K and Kohn, M (2018) USDA/FAS Food for Progress LIFFT-Cashew. SeGaBi Cashew Value Chain Study. pp. 1–163. Available at https://www.climatefinancelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/SeGaBi-study_final_18.03.02_pub.pdf.Google Scholar
Kassambara, A and Mundt, F (2017) Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.5. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra.Google Scholar
Kouakou, CK, Konan, AD, N'Da Adopo, AA, N'Da, HA, Djaha, A, Minhibo, MY, Djidji, MY, Dosso, M and N'Guessan, AEB (2018) Agro-morphological characterization of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) ecotypes from North-Central of Côte d'Ivoire. Fruits 73, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouakou, CK, Konan, JA, Doga, D and Kouadio, ABR (2022) Genetic diversity of cashew. Cash Crops 1, 523555. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74926-2_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matos, CHA, Nunes, JAR, Lopes, ACDA and Gomes, RLF (2019) Selection of common cashew tree genotypes in commercial growing areas in municipalities of Piauí, Brazil. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 19, 245252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, RM, Cavalcanti, EP and Medeiros, JFD (2020) Classificação climática de Köppen para o estado do Piauí–Brasil. Revista Equador 9, 8299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo-Filho, OM, Costa, JTA, Cavalcante Junior, AT, Bezerra, MA and Mesquita, RCM (2006) Biometric characterization, growth seedlings and handle grafting of the new rootstock of precocious dwarfed cashew. Revista Ciência Agronômica 37, 332338.Google Scholar
Nair, KP (2021) Cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale L.). In Nair, KP (ed), Tree Crops: Harvesting Cash from the World's Important Cash Crops. Cham: Springer, pp. 2777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, VF, Silva, FG, Resende, EC, Pereira, PS, Silva, FHL and Egea, MB (2019) Physicochemical characterization of ‘Cerrado'cashew (Anacardium othonianum Rizzini) fruits and pseudofruits. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 99, 61996208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, NN, Mothé, CG, Mothé, MG and Oliveira, LG (2020) Cashew nut and cashew apple: a scientific and technological monitoring worldwide review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 57, 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, JR, Barros, LM and Cavalcanti, JJV (2009) Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) breeding: a global perspective. In Jain, SM and Priyadarshan, PM (eds), Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Tropical Species. New York: Springer, pp. 278324.Google Scholar
Palei, S, Dasmohapatra, R, Samal, S and Rout, GR (2019) Cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale L.) breeding strategies. In Al-Khayri, J, Jain, S and Johnson, D (eds), Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Nut and Beverage Crops. 1st Cham: Springer, pp. 77104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, LD, Silva, DFPD, Souza, LKFD, Pereira, ETL, Assunção, HFD and Costa, MM (2019) Genetic diversity of bushy cashew (Anacardium humile A. St.-Hil.) based on characteristics of fruits. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 41, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (1970) Adaptative hierarchical clustering schemes Sys. O Biologico 19, 5882.Google Scholar
Rossetti, AG, Vidal, FDC and Barros, LDM (2019) Sampling of cashew nuts as an aid to research for the genetic improvement of cashew tree. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 54, e00962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, RC and Santos-Junior, JE (2015) Divergência genética por análise multivariada de caracteres fenotípicos de Anacardium humile (St. Hilaire). Revista Ceres 62, 553560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, JO, Mayo, SJ, Bittencourt, CB and de Andrade, IM (2019) Genetic diversity in wild populations of the restinga ecotype of the cashew (Anacardium occidentale) in coastal Piaui Brazil. Plant Systematics and Evolution 305, 913924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saroj, PL, Bhat, PS and Srikumar, KK (2016) Tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis spp.) A devastating pest of cashew plantations in India: a review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86, 151162.Google Scholar
Savadi, S, Muralidhara, BM and Preethi, P (2020) Advances in genomics of cashew tree: molecular tools and strategies for accelerated breeding. Tree Genetics Genomes 16, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savadi, S, Sowmya, K, Megha, VS, Muralidhara, BM and Mohana, GS (2021) Genetic diversity and identification of interspecific hybrids of Anacardium species using microsatellites. Brazilian Journal of Botany 44, 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semporé, JN, Songré-Ouattara, LT, Tarpaga, WV, Bationo, F and Dicko, MH (2021) Morphological characterization and quality assessment of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) nuts from 53 accessions of Burkina Faso. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 6, 100219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P and Sokal, R (1973) Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: S. W. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stéphane, KY, Halbin, KJ and Charlemagne, N (2020) Comparative study of physical properties of cashew nuts from three main production areas in Côte d'Ivoire. Agricultural Sciences 11, 12321250.10.4236/as.2020.1112081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, M, Mayo, SJ and Andrade, IM (2014) Geometric morphometrics of leaves of Anacardium microcarpum Ducke and A. occidentale L. (Anacardiaceae) from the coastal region of Piauí, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 37, 315327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, NZ, Bagnan, MA, Akossou, AYJ and Kanlindogbe, CB (2016) Caractérisation morphologique d'une collection de fruits d'anacardier provenant de la commune de Parakou (Bénin). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 10, 24132422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonni, I, Sereme, D, Ouedraogo, I, Kassankagno, AI, Dao, I, Ouedraogo, L and Nacro, S (2017) Diseases of cashew nut plants (Anacardium occidentale L.) in Burkina Faso. Advances in Plants Agriculture Research 6, 1015406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Matos-Filho et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Matos-Filho et al. supplementary material(File)
File 39.8 KB