Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:42:50.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Altitudinal diversity in horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) landraces collected from Himalayan hill region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2010

Arun Gupta*
Affiliation:
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora 263 601, Uttarakhand, India
Anuradha Bhartiya
Affiliation:
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora 263 601, Uttarakhand, India
Gyanendra Singh
Affiliation:
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora 263 601, Uttarakhand, India
Vinay Mahajan
Affiliation:
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora 263 601, Uttarakhand, India
J. C. Bhatt
Affiliation:
Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora 263 601, Uttarakhand, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: arung66@gmail.com

Abstract

A total of 54 horsegram landraces collected from three altitudinal zones (lower hills, mid hills and higher hills) of Himalayan region were characterized and evaluated for nine quantitative characters. Accessions collected from lower and higher hills were more diverse and differed significantly from mid hills accessions for characters viz., days to flowering, days to physiological maturity, plant height and grain yield per plant. The plotting of first and second principal component axes scores revealed that there was dispersion among the accessions collected from different altitudinal groups. It reveals a less variability among the landraces collected from same altitudinal group but high variability among the landraces collected from different altitudes. This suggests that the horsegram landraces are adapted to specific zone due to different selection pressure practiced by the farmers at different altitudes. Farmers in lower and higher hills select the landraces having high grain yield coupled with less reproductive phase duration and taller in nature.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bisht, IS, Mehta, PS and Bhandari, DC (2007) Traditional crop diversity and its conservation on-farm for sustainable agricultural production in Kumaon Himalaya of Uttaranchal state: a case study. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 345357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demissie, A and Bjόrnstad, A (1996) Phenotypic diversity of Ethiopian barleys in relation to geographical regions, altitudinal range, and agro-ecological zones: as an aid to germplasm collection and conservation strategy. Hereditas 124: 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, DM (1955) Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manyasa, EO, Silm, SN, Githiri, SM and Christiansen, JL (2008) Diversity in Tanzanian pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. landraces and their response to environment. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 379387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, RG (1985) Augmented design for preliminary yield trials. Rachis 4: 2732.Google Scholar
Rao, CR (1974) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya 26: 329358.Google Scholar
Rojas, W, Barriga, P and Figueroa, H (2000) Multivariate analysis of the genetic diversity of Bolivian quinoa germplasm. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 122: 1623.Google Scholar
Zhong, GY and Qualset, CO (1995) Quantitative genetic diversity and conservation strategies for an allogamous annual species Dasypyrum villosum (L.) Candargy (Poaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 10641073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed