Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.223 Render date: 2021-11-29T15:49:17.233Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

A comparative assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated barley collected in different decades of the last century in Austria, Albania and India by using genomic and genic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Elena K. Khlestkina
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, D-06466, Gatersleben, Germany
Rajeev K. Varshney
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, D-06466, Gatersleben, Germany
Marion S. Röder
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, D-06466, Gatersleben, Germany
Andreas Graner
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, D-06466, Gatersleben, Germany
Andreas Börner*
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, D-06466, Gatersleben, Germany
*
§Corresponding author: E-mail: boerner@ipk-gatersleben.de

Abstract

Molecular investigations of qualitative and quantitative changes in the genetic diversity of cultivated crops are useful for plant breeding and the management of crop genetic resources. A genotyping study, based on 28 genomic (g-SSR) and 13 expressed sequence tag-derived (e-SSR) microsatellite markers uniformly distributed across the barley genome, was conducted on samples of cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) collected at intervals of 40–50 years in three comparable geographical regions in Austria, Albania and India. The analysis indicated an absence of any significant differences either in the total number of alleles per locus or in g-SSR and e-SSR polymorphic information content (PIC) values from the Indian and Austrian materials. However, a slight reduction in genetic diversity was noted among the materials collected in Albania. The trend in numbers of collection mission-specific SSR alleles suggests significant allele flow over the time interval sampled. The g-SSRs yielded a higher mean number of alleles per locus and a superior PIC than the e-SSR markers. We conclude that a qualitative, rather than a quantitative shift in diversity has taken place over time, and that g-SSR markers detect more diversity than do e-SSR markers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, JA, Churchill, GA, Antrique, JE, Tanksley, SD and Sorrels, ME (1993) Optimising parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36, 181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backes, G, Hatz, B, Jahoor, A and Fischbeck, G (2003) RFLP diversity within and between major groups of barley in Europe. Plant Breeding 122, 291299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J and Heun, M (1995) Barley microsatellites: allele variation and mapping. Plant Molecular Biology 27, 835845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, MJ, Andersen, SB and Ortitz, R (2002) Diversity changes in an intensively bread wheat germplasm during the 20th century. Molecular Breeding 9, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donini, P, Law, JR, Koebner, RMD, Reeves, JC and Cooke, RJ (2000) Temporal trends in the diversity of UK wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100, 912917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eujayl, I, Sorrells, ME, Baum, M, Wolters, P and Powell, W (2002) Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104, 399407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregova, E, Tisova, V and Kraic, J (1997) Genetic variability at the Glu-1 loci in old and modern wheats ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivated in Slovakia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44, 301306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, PK and Varshney, RK (2000) The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113, 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khlestkina, EK, Huang, XQ, Quenum, FJ-B, Chebotar, S, Röder, MS, Börner, A (2004 a) Genetic diversity in cultivated plants—loss or stability?. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 14661472.Google ScholarPubMed
Khlestkina, EK, Röder, MS, Efremova, TT, Börner, A and Shumny, VK (2004 b) The genetic diversity of old and modern Siberian varieties of common spring wheat determined by microsatellite markers. Plant Breeding 123, 122127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koebner, RMD, Dononi, P, Reeves, JC, Cooke, RJ and Law, JR (2003) Temporal flux in the molecular diversity of UK barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 550558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kota, R, Varshney, RK, Thiel, T, Dehmer, K-J and Graner, A (2001) Generation and comparison of EST-derived SSR and SNP markers in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.). Hereditas 135, 141151.Google Scholar
Li, JZ, Sjakste, TG, Röder, MS and Ganal, MW (2003) Development and genetic mapping of 127 new microsatellite markers in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 10211027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Z-W, Biyashev, RM, Saghai Maroof, MA (1996) Development of simple sequence repeat markers and their integration into barley linkage map. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 867876.Google ScholarPubMed
Malysheva-Otto, L, Ganal, MW, Law, JR, Reeves, JC and Röder, MS (2004) Temporal flux of molecular diversity in barley cultivars released in Europe over the 20th century. Abstract at the 3rd Plant Genomics European Meeting, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Manifesto, MM, Schlatter, AR, Hopp, HE, Suarez, EY and Dubcovsky, J (2001) Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers. Crop Science 41, 682690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, HB and Whitney, DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics 18, 5060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillen, K, Binder, A, Kreuzkam, B, Ramsay, L, Waugh, R, Forster, J and Leon, J (2000) Mapping new EMBL-derived barley microsatellites and their use in differentiating German barley cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101, 652660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaschke, J, Ganal, MW, Röder, MS (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91, 10011007.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramsay, L, Macaulay, M, degli Ivanissivich, S, MacLean, K, Cardle, L, Fuller, J, Edwards, K, Tuvensson, S, Morgante, M, Massari, A, Maesti, E, Marmiroli, N, Sjakste, T, Ganal, M, Powell, W and Waugh, R (2000) A simple sequence repeat-based linkage map of barley. Genetics 156, 19972005.Google ScholarPubMed
Röder, MS, Korzun, V, Wendehake, K, Plaschke, J, Tixier, M-H, Leroy, P and Ganal, MW (1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149, 20072023.Google ScholarPubMed
Röder, MS, Huang, X-Q and Ganal, MW (2004) Wheat microsatellites: potential and implications. In: Lörz, H, Wenzel, G (eds) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 55. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Molecular Marker Systems, pp. 255266.Google Scholar
Roussel, V, Koenig, J, Beckert, M and Balfourier, F (2004) Molecular diversity in French bread wheat accessions related to temporal trends and breeding programmes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 920930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, JR, Ellis, RP, Thomas, WTB, Waugh, R, Provan, R, Botth, A, Fuller, J, Lawrence, P, Young, G and Powell, W (2000) A retrospective analysis of spring barley germplasm development from ‘foundation genotypes’ to currently successful cultivars. Molecular Breeding 6, 553568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J, Booth, A, Fuller, J, Harrower, B, Hedley, P, Machray, G and Powell, W (2004) A comparison of sequence-based polymorphism and haplotype content in transcribed and anonymous regions of the barley genome. Genome 47, 389398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saghai Maroof, MA, Biyashev, RM, Yang, GP, Zhang, Q and Allard, RW (1994) Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91, 54665470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struss, D and Plieske, J (1998) The use of microsatellite markers for detection of genetic diversity in barley populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97, 308315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sustar-Vozlic, J, Maras, M and Meglic, V (2004) Assessment of genetic erosion in Slovenian common bean germplasm. In: Vollmann J Gransgruber H Ruckenbauer P Proceedings of the XVIIth EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria,8–11 September 2004.Vienna:Boku—University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences,. 7579.Google Scholar
Thiel, T, Michalek, W, Varshney, RK and Graner, A (2003) Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 411422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, RK, Korzun, V, Börner, A (2004) Molecular maps in cereals: methodology and progress. In: Gupta, PK, Varshney, RK (eds) Cereal Genomics Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 3582.Google Scholar
Varshney, RK, Graner, A and Sorrells, ME (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23, 4855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A comparative assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated barley collected in different decades of the last century in Austria, Albania and India by using genomic and genic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A comparative assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated barley collected in different decades of the last century in Austria, Albania and India by using genomic and genic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A comparative assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated barley collected in different decades of the last century in Austria, Albania and India by using genomic and genic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *