Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:52:59.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stratal structure of Kuria morphological tone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2024

Jochen Trommer
Jochen Trommer*
Affiliation:
Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig, Beethovenstraße 15, 04107 Leipzig, Germany. Email: jtrommer@uni-leipzig.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marlo et al. (2015) claim that Kuria verbal tone morphology undermines three well-established principles of locality and modularity: (1) Phonological Locality: the assumption that rules and constraints may only evaluate a small window of phonological objects; (2) Cyclic Locality: the stratal organization of morphophonology into stems, words and phrases; and (3) Indirect Reference: the claim that phonological rules and constraints cannot directly access morphosyntactic information. Sande et al. (2020) turn this claim into an argument for a new model of the morphosyntax–phonology interface, Cophonologies by Phase, which erases the separation between phonology and morphology and abandons standard locality domains in favour of syntactic phases. In this article, I show that the conclusions of both articles are unfounded: the Kuria data follow naturally from an analysis based on autosegmental tone melodies in a version of Stratal Optimality Theory which embraces all three restrictions, Phonological and Cyclic Locality and Indirect Reference, the latter implemented by Coloured Containment Theory. I argue that this approach obviates the technical and conceptual objections raised by Marlo et al. against a tone-melody analysis of Kuria, and makes more restrictive predictions about possible systems of tonal morphophonology compared to construction phonology frameworks.

Keywords

tonelocalityStratal OTmodularity
Type
Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 679 - 723
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.) The morphology and phonology of exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 8–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2018a). In defence of underlying representations: Latin rhotacism, French liaison, Romanian palatalization. Probus 30. 171–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2018b). Stratal phonology. In Hannahs, S. J. & Bosch, Anna R. K. (eds.) The Routledge handbook of phonological theory. Abingdon: Routledge. 100–134.Google Scholar
Breteler, Jeroen (2018). A foot-based typology of tonal reassociation: perspectives from synchrony and learnability. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cahill, Michael (2007). Aspects of the morphology and phonology of Konni. Dallas, TX: SIL International and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Cammenga, Jelle (2004). Igikuria phonology and morphology. Berlin: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert (1994). A grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Downing, Laura (2012). Prosodic domains do not match spell-out domains. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22. 1–14.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clark, Mary M. (1990). The tonal system of Igbo. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. (1984). Principles of tone assignment in Kikuyu. In Clements, George N. & Goldsmith, John (eds.) Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone. Dordrecht: Foris. 281–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. (2001). Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Hall, Tracy Alan (ed.) Distinctive feature theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 71–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diercks, Michael, Ranero, Rodrigo & Paster, Mary (2015). Evidence for a clitic analysis of object markers in Kuria. In Kramer, Ruth, Zsiga, Elizabeth C. & Boyer, One Tlale (eds.) Selected proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 52–70.Google Scholar
Dolatian, Hossep (2022). An apparent case of outwardly sensitive allomorphy in the Armenian definite. Glossa 7. 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Kadenge, Maxwell (2020). Re-placing PStem in the prosodic hierarchy. The Linguistic Review 37. 433–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebarb, Kristopher J. (2014). Tone and variation in Idakho and other Luhya varieties. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Gjersøe, Siri Moen (2019). Tonal interactions in Nuer nominal inflection. PhD dissertation, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Mark & Prince, Alan (1989). OCP, locality, and linking: the North Karanga verb. WCCFL 8. 176–191.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2001a). Privative tone in Bantu. In Shigeki, Kaji (ed.) Proceedings of the symposium ‘Crosslinguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Tonogenesis, Japanese Accentology, and Other Topics’. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. 237–258.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2001b). Tone systems. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.) Language typology and language universals: an international handbook, volume 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1367–1380.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2008). Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46. 309–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2011). The representation of tone. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. 1078–1102.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2012). Issues in the phonology-morphology interface in African languages. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 8. 20–31.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2017). Prefixal vowel length in Lulamogi: a stratal account. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38. 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Byarushengo, Ernest Rugwa (1984). A model of Haya tonology. In Clements, George N. & Goldsmith, John (eds.) Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone. Dordrecht: Foris. 53–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Ngunga, Armindo (1994). On the non-universality of tonal association conventions: evidence from Ciyao. Phonology 11. 25–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon (1995). The consequences of optimization for underspecification. NELS 25. 287–302.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Caballero, Gabriela (2013). Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology 23. 103–143.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1988). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Jaker, Alessandro & Kiparsky, Paul (2020). Level ordering and opacity in Tets\k{\'{o}}t'{\i}n\'e: a Stratal OT account. Phonology 37. 617–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Adam (2016). Computationally, tone is different. Phonology 33. 247–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm: selected papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17. 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2020). Morphological units: stems. In Aronoff, Mark (ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leben, William (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael R. (2007). The verbal tonology of Lunyala and Lumarachi: two dialects of Luluyia (Bantu, J.30, Kenya). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael R., Mwita, Leonard Chacha & Paster, Mary (2012). Problems in Kuria H tone assignment. Ms, University of Missouri, Kenyatta University and Pomona College.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael R., Mwita, Leonard Chacha & Paster, Mary (2014). Kuria tone melodies. Africana Linguistica 20. 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlo, Michael R., Mwita, Leonard Chacha & Paster, Mary (2015). Problems in Kuria H tone assignment. NLLT 33. 251–265.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J., Mullin, Kevin & Smith, Brian W. (2012). Implications of Harmonic Serialism for lexical tone association. In Botma, Bert & Noske, Roland (eds.) Phonological explorations. empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues. Berlin: De Gruyter. 265–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Laura (2016). Cumulativity and ganging in the tonology of Awa suffixes. Lg 92. e38–e66.Google Scholar
Mutaka, Ngessimo M. (1994). The lexical tonology of Kinande. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Mwita, Leonard Chacha (2008). Verbal tone in Kuria. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott (1997). OCP effects in Optimality Theory. NLLT 15. 847–892.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dodrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1986). On the role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in phonological theory. Lg 62. 353–383.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1988). Floating tones and contour tones in Kenyang. Studies in African Linguistics 19. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David (1996). The phonology and morphology of Kimatuumbi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology with special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Paschen, Ludger (2018). The interaction of reduplication and segmental mutation: a phonological account. PhD dissertation, Leipzig University.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary (2003). Floating tones in Gã. Studies in African Linguistics 32. 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary (2019). Phonology counts. Radical 1. 1–61.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary & Kim, Yuni (2011). Downstep in Tiriki. Linguistic Discovery 9. 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (1986). Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas (2018). Grammatical tone: typology and theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas (2021). Lexical tone contrast in Izon as ubiquitous floating tone. Phonological Data and Analysis 3. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas & Lionnet, Florian (2020). Phantom structure: a representational account of floating tone association. In Baek, Hyunah, Takahashi, Chikako & Yeung, Alex Hong-Lun (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America. 10 pp.Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah (2018). Cross-word morphologically conditioned scalar tone shift in Guébie. Morphology 28. 253–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sande, Hannah, Jenks, Peter & Inkelas, Sharon (2020). Cophonologies by ph(r)ase. NLLT 38. 1211 –1261.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tebay, Sören E. (2022). Interacting (with) morpheme structure constraints. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1992). Tone sandhi and vowel deletion in Margi. Studies in African Linguistics 23. 111–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1995). On the status of universal association conventions: evidence from Mixteco. BLS 21. 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Jochen (2011). Phonological aspects of Western Nilotic mutation morphology. Habilitation thesis, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen (2021). The subsegmental structure of German plural allomorphy. NLLT 39. 601–656.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen (2022). The concatenative structure of tonal overwriting. LI. 57 pp.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc (2007). Derived environment effects and consistency of exponence. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrik & Krämer, Martin (eds.) Freedom of analysis? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Matthew (2007). For an autosegmental theory of mutation. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32. 315–404.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva (2009). Metathesis without reordering. Master’s thesis, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva (2014). A phonological account of morphological length. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva (2016). The power of a single representation: morphological tone and allomorphy. Morphology 26. 269–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl (2003). Optimal tone mapping. LI 34. 225–268.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Trommer supplementary material

Trommer supplementary material
Download Trommer supplementary material(File)
File 589.3 KB