Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-qf55q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T23:10:33.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard M. Hogg (1992). A grammar of Old English. Vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. xii + 355.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

B. Elan Dresher
B. Elan Dresher
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1993 , pp. 146 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunner, K. (1965). Altenglische Grammatik (nach der angelsdchsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers neubearbeitet). 3rd revised edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bülbring, K. D. (1902). Altenglisches Elementarbuch. Vol. 1: Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cosijn, P. J. (1883–1986). Altwestsächsische Grammatik. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. E. (1978). Old English and the theory of phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1985, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. E. (1980). The Mercian second fronting: a case of rule loss in Old English. LI 11. 45–73.Google Scholar
Eliason, N. E. (1960). Review of Campbell (1959). Speculum 35. 435–438.Google Scholar
Funke, O. (1963). Review of Campbell (1959). English Studies 44. 205–209.Google Scholar
Girvan, R. (1931). Angelsaksisch Handbook. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Healey, A. Di. P. & Venezky, R. L. (1980). A microfiche concordance to Old English. Toronto: Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1992). Phonology and morphology. In Hogg, R. M. (ed.) The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 67–167.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J. & O'Neil, W. (1985). Rule generalization and optionality in language change. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1988). Phonological change. In Nevvmeyer, F. J. (ed.) Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Vol. 1: Linguistic theory: foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 363–415.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. M. (1965). The Vespasian Psalter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A. (1982). Theoretical implications of phonological change: evidence from Germanic languages. PhD dissertation, Brown University, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1914–1940). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Tauchnitz. Reprinted 1964, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (1886). Primzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (1890). Principles of the history of language. Translated by H. A. Strong. Reprinted 1970, College Park, Maryland: McGrath.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1893). Altgermanische Metrik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1898). Angelsächsische Grammatik. 3rd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1901). Grundzüge der Phonetik. 5th edn. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1903). An Old English grammar. Translated and edited by Cook, A. S.. Boston: Ginn. Republished 1970, St Clair Shores, Mich.: Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Toon, T. E. (1983). The politics of early Old English sound change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. & Wright, E. M. (1925). Old English grammar. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar