Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:08:00.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing surface phonological specification through simulation and classification of phonetic trajectories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2018

Jason A. Shaw  and
Shigeto Kawahara
Jason A. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Shigeto Kawahara*
Affiliation:
Keio University
*
E-mail: jason.shaw@yale.edu, kawahara@icl.keio.ac.jp.
E-mail: jason.shaw@yale.edu, kawahara@icl.keio.ac.jp.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many previous studies have argued that phonology may leave some phonetic dimensions unspecified in surface representations. We introduce computational tools for assessing this possibility though simulation and classification of phonetic trajectories. The empirical material used to demonstrate the approach comes from electromagnetic articulography recordings of high-vowel devoicing in Japanese. Using Discrete Cosine Transform, tongue-dorsum movement trajectories are decomposed into a small number of frequency components (cosines differing in frequency and amplitude) that correspond to linguistically meaningful signal modulations, i.e. articulatory gestures. Stochastic generators of competing phonological hypotheses operate in this frequency space. Distributions over frequency components are used to simulate (i) the vowel-present trajectories and (ii) the vowel-absent trajectories. A Bayesian classifier trained on simulations assigns posterior probabilities to unseen data. Results indicate that /u/ is optionally produced without a vowel-height specification in Tokyo Japanese and that the frequency of such targetlessness varies systematically across phonological environments.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 481 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderete, John (1995). Winnebago accent and Dorsey's Law. In Beckman, Jill, Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA. 21–51.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, et al. (1997). 35–68.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5. 183–207.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert (2015). Underspecification in intonation revisited: a reply to Xu, Lee, Prom-on and Liu. Phonology 32. 537–541.Google Scholar
Bayles, Andrew, Kaplan, Aaron & Kaplan, Abby (2016). Inter- and intra-speaker variation in French schwa. Glossa 1(1):19. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.54.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. (1982). Segment duration and the ‘mora’ in Japanese. Phonetica 39. 113–135.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. (1996). When is a syllable not a syllable? In Otake, Takashi & Cutler, Anne (eds.) Phonological structure and language processing: cross-linguistic studies. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 95–123.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Shoji, Atsuko (1984). Spectral and perceptual evidence for CV coarticulation in devoiced /si/ and /syu/ in Japanese. Phonetica 41. 61–71.Google Scholar
Berent, Iris, Lennertz, Tracy, Smolensky, Paul & Vaknin-Nusbaum, Vered (2009). Listeners’ knowledge of phonological universals: evidence from nasal clusters. Phonology 26. 75–108.Google Scholar
Berent, Iris, Steriade, Donca, Lennertz, Tracy & Vaknin, Vered (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 104. 591–630.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey J. (2011). Accuracy of the NDI Wave Speech Research System. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54. 1295–1301.Google Scholar
Blackwood Ximenes, Arwen, Shaw, Jason A. & Carignan, Christopher (2017). A comparison of acoustic and articulatory methods for analyzing vowel differences across dialects: data from American and Australian English. JASA 142. 363–377.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 45–86.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1992). ‘Targetless’ schwa: an articulatory analysis. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 26–56.Google Scholar
Carré, Rene & Chennoukh, Samir (1995). Vowel-consonant-vowel modeling by superposition of consonant closure on vowel-to-vowel gestures. JPh 23. 231–241.Google Scholar
Choi, John D. (1995). An acoustic-phonetic underspecification account of Marshallese vowel allophony. JPh 23. 323–347.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Kawahara, Shigeto (2013). Frequency biases in phonological variation. NLLT 31. 47–89.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2011). The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 401–431.Google Scholar
Cohen Priva, Uriel (2017). Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Lg 93. 569–597.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. (1993). Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10. 43–81.Google Scholar
Coleman, John (2001). The phonetics and phonology of Tashlhiyt Berber syllabic consonants. Transactions of the Philological Society 99. 29–64.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2006a). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. JASA 120. 407–415.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2006b). Schwa elision in fast speech: segmental deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63. 79–112.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2010). Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: evidence from English and Catalan. JPh 38. 272–288.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa & Shaw, Jason A. (2012). Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception. JPh 40. 234–248.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart & Baertsch, Karen (2011). On the relationship between codas and onset clusters. In Cairns, Charles E. & Raimy, Eric (eds.) Handbook of the syllable. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 71–97.Google Scholar
Dell, François & Elmedlaoui, Mohamed (1985). Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7. 105–130.Google Scholar
Elvin, Jaydene, Williams, Daniel & Escudero, Paola (2016). Dynamic acoustic properties of monophthongs and diphthongs in Western Sydney Australian English. JASA 140. 576–581.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Masako (2015). Vowel devoicing. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.) The handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 167–214.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. (2002). A grammar of gestural coordination. NLLT 20. 269–337.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I., Charlow, Simon, Shaw, Jason A. & Hoole, Philip (2014). Stochastic time analysis of syllable-referential intervals and simplex onsets. JPh 44. 152–166.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip, Roon, Kevin & Zeroual, Chakir (2010). Variation in overlap and phonological grammar in Moroccan Arabic clusters. In Fougeron, Cécile, Kühnert, Barbara, D'Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Nathalie (eds.) Laboratory phonology 10. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 657–698.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2004). Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: the case of syllable contact. Phonology 21. 201–250.Google Scholar
Gu, Chong (2013). Smoothing spline ANOVA models. 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1997). Competence, performance, and the generative grammar of variation. In Hinskens, et al. (1997). 125–143.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Eagle, Josie White (1980). A preliminary metrical account of Winnebago accent. IJAL 46. 117–132.Google Scholar
Hall, Nancy (2006). Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion. Phonology 23. 387–429.Google Scholar
Hall, Nancy (2013). Acoustic differences between lexical and epenthetic vowels in Lebanese Arabic. JPh 41. 133–143.Google Scholar
Hanson, Rebecca (2010). A grammar of Yine (Piro). PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke (1977). The tone pattern of Japanese: an autosegmental theory of tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.) (1997). Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jain, Anil K. (1989). Fundamentals of digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2014). Prosodic typology II: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Beckman, Mary (1993). A gestural overlap analysis of vowel devoicing in Japanese and Korean. Handout of paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, Beckman, Mary E. & Lee, Hyuck-Joon (1998). Fiberscopic evidence for the influence on vowel devoicing of the glottal configurations for Korean obstruents. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96. 43–68.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2015). A catalogue of phonological opacity in Japanese. Version 1.2. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 46. 145–174.Google Scholar
Kawakami, Shin (1977). Nihongo onsei gaisetsu. [Outline of Japanese phonetics.] Tokyo: Oofuu-sha.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1988). Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5. 275–292.Google Scholar
Kondo, Mariko (2000). Vowel devoicing and syllable structure in Japanese. In Nakayama, Mineharu & Quinn, Charles J. Jr (eds.) Japanese/Korean linguistics. Vol. 9. Stanford: CSLI. 125–138.Google Scholar
Kondo, Mariko (2005). Syllable structure and its acoustic effects on vowels in devoicing environments. In van de Weijer, Jeroen, Nanjo, Kensuke & Nishihara, Tetsuo (eds.) Voicing in Japanese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 229–245.Google Scholar
Lammert, Adam, Goldstein, Louis, Ramanarayanan, Vikram & Narayanan, Shrikanth (2014). Gestural control in the English past-tense suffix: an articulatory study using real-time MRI. Phonetica 71. 229–248.Google Scholar
Lee, Sungbok, Byrd, Dani & Krivokapić, Jelena (2006). Functional data analysis of prosodic effects on articulatory timing. JASA 119. 1666–1671.Google Scholar
Mooshammer, Christine, Hoole, Philip & Kühnert, Barbara (1995). On loops. JPh 23. 3–21.Google Scholar
Mrayati, M., Carré, R. & Guérin, B. (1988). Distinctive regions and modes: a new theory of speech production. Speech Communication 7. 257–286.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott (1998). Surface underspecification of tone in Chichewa. Phonology 15. 367–391.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kuniko Y. (2015). Continuous versus categorical aspects of Japanese consecutive devoicing. JPh 52. 70–88.Google Scholar
Öhman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. JASA 39. 151–168.Google Scholar
Parrell, Benjamin, Lee, Sungbok & Byrd, Dani (2013). Evaluation of prosodic juncture strength using functional data analysis. JPh 41. 442–452.Google Scholar
Perrier, Pascal, Payan, Yohan, Zandipour, Majid & Perkell, Joseph (2003). Influences of tongue biomechanics on speech movements during the production of velar stop consonants: a modeling study. JASA 114. 1582–1599.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. (1990). Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Lg 66. 78–105.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina (2009). An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. JASA 125. 2288–2298.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid (2008). Syllables without vowels: phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology 25. 321–359.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid & Fougeron, Cécile (2011). Schwa elements in Tashlhiyt word-initial clusters. Laboratory Phonology 2. 275–300.Google Scholar
Saltzman, Elliot, Nam, Hosung, Krivokapić, Jelena & Goldstein, Louis (2008). A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody. Campinas, Brazil. 175–184. Available (May 2018) at http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2008/.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Best, Catherine T., Docherty, Gerard, Evans, Bronwen G., Foulkes, Paul, Hay, Jennifer & Mulak, Karen E. (2018). Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation. Laboratory Phonology 9. http://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.87.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Chen, Wei-rong, Proctor, Michael I. & Derrick, Donald (2016). Influences of tone on vowel articulation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 59. S1566–S1574.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Davidson, Lisa (2011). Perceptual similarity in input–output mappings: a computational/experimental study of non-native speech production. Lingua 121. 1344–1358.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Gafos, Adamantios I. (2010). Quantitative evaluation of competing syllable parses. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 54–62.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Gafos, Adamantios I. (2015). Stochastic time models of syllable structure. PLoS One 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124714.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip & Zeroual, Chakir (2009). Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation. Phonology 26. 187–215.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip & Zeroual, Chakir (2011). Dynamic invariance in the phonetic expression of syllable structure: a case study of Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Phonology 28. 455–490.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Kawahara, Shigeto (2017). Effects of surprisal and entropy on vowel duration in Japanese. Language and Speech. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0023830917737331.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Kawahara, Shigeto (2018a). Consequences of high vowel deletion for syllabification in Japanese. In Gallagher, Gillian, Gouskova, Maria & Yin, Sora Heng (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Meeting on Phonology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/amp.v5i0.4241.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jason A. & Kawahara, Shigeto (2018b). The lingual articulation of devoiced /u/ in Tokyo Japanese. JPh 66. 100–119.Google Scholar
Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D. & Simonsohn, Uri (2011). False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22. 1359–1366.Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline L. (1995). Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures. In Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205–222.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul, Goldrick, Matthew & Mathis, Donald (2014). Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: a framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science 38. 1102–1138.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep (1992). Phonetic and phonological processes: the case of nasalization. Language and Speech 35. 29–43.Google Scholar
Stanton, Juliet & Zukoff, Sam (2018). Prosodic identity in copy epenthesis: evidence for a correspondence-based approach. NLLT 36. 637–684.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja (2009). The interaction of Dorsey's Law and stress: a non-foot based approach. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on the Foot. Handout available (May 2018) at http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/patrycja.strycharczuk/CV_files/handout.pdf.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja, Veer, Marijn van ’t, Bruil, Martine & Linke, Kathrin (2014). Phonetic evidence on phonology–morphosyntax interactions: sibilant voicing in Quito Spanish. JL 50. 403–452.Google Scholar
Tiede, Mark (2005). MVIEW: software for visualization and analysis of concurrently recorded movement data. New Haven: Haskins Laboratories.Google Scholar
Tsuchida, Ayako (1997). The phonetics and phonology of Japanese vowel devoicing. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change: with special reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watson, Catherine I. & Harrington, Jonathan (1999). Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. JASA 106. 458–468.Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn, Tomaschek, Fabian, Arnold, Denis, Tiede, Mark, Bröker, Franziska, Thiele, Samuel, Wood, Simon N. & Baayen, R. Harald (2016). Investigating dialectal differences using articulography. JPh 59. 122–143.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin & Davidson, Lisa (2013). Bayesian analysis of non-native cluster production. NELS 40. 265–278.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney (1979). A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. JPh 7. 25–43.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi, Lee, Albert, Prom-on, Santitham & Liu, Fang (2015). Explaining the PENTA model: a reply to Arvaniti and Ladd. Phonology 32. 505–535.Google Scholar
Ying, Jia, Carignan, Christopher, Shaw, Jason A., Proctor, Michael, Derrick, Donald & Best, Catherine T. (2017). Temporal dynamics of lateral channel formation in /l/: 3D EMA data from Australian English. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017. 2978–2982. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-765.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Shaw and Kawahara supplementary material

Shaw and Kawahara supplementary material 1

Download Shaw and Kawahara supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 799 KB