Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T20:28:55.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Subjective Tradition in Phenomenological Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

John Bucklew
John Bucklew*
Affiliation:
Lawrence College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Phenomenology, currently the most active philosophical movement on the European scene, has shown persistent concern for psychological problems and principles, and for the science of psychology in general. This concern has taken the form of various attempts to amend psychology according to phenomenological precepts and methods with the intent of providing it with a new metaphysical basis. Recent examples of this trend are the textbook of Snygg and Combs (20) and the two books published in France by the philosopher, Merleau-Ponty (16, 18).

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1955 , pp. 289 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The material for this paper was prepared while the author was on a Ford Foundation Fellowship in France.

References

1. Brentano, F. Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkte. Vol. I., Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot. 1874.Google Scholar
2. Buytendyk, F. J. J. Traité de Psychologie Animale. Paris: Presses Univ. de France, 1952.Google Scholar
3. Creegan, R. F. “Phenomenology” in Harriman, P. L. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Psychology, N. Y.: Philosophical library, 1946, 512–515.Google Scholar
4. Farber, Marvin (ed.) Philosophical Essays in Memory of E. Husserl. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1940.10.4159/harvard.9780674333512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Husserl, E. Article on “Phenomenology” in Encyclopedia Britannica, 12th ed., vol. 17, 699–702.Google Scholar
6. Husserl, E. “La Crise des Sciences Européenes et la Phénoménologie Transcendentale.” Etudes philos., 1949, 4, 229–302.Google Scholar
7. Husserl, E. Erfahrung und Urteil. Prague: Academic Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1939.Google Scholar
8. Husserl, E. Idées Directrices pour une Phénoménologie. (Trans. Ricoeur, P.) Paris, Gallimard, 1950.Google Scholar
9. Husserl, E. Méditations cartesiennes. (Trans. Peiffer, G. et Levinas, E.) Paris: A. Colin, 1931.Google Scholar
10. Jaspers, K. The Perennial Scope of Philosophy. (Trans. R. Mannheim), N. Y.: Philosophical Libr., 1949.Google Scholar
11. Kantor, J. R. “Interbchaviorism, Social Psychology, and Sociology.” Kwartalnik Psychologiczny, 1937, 9, 16p.Google Scholar
12. Kierkegaard, S. Les Miettes Philosophiques. (Trans. P. Petit), Paris, Edition de livres Fran., 1947.Google Scholar
13. Krikorian, Y. H. (ed.) Naturalism and the Human Spirit. N. Y.: Columbia Univ. Press, 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. MacLeod, R. B. “The Phenomenological Approach To Social Psychology.” Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Marcel, G. The Mystery of Being, vol I. (Trans. G. Frazer). London: Harvill Press, 1950.Google Scholar
16. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.Google Scholar
17. Merleau-Ponty, M. Sens et Non-sens. Paris: Nagel., 1948.Google Scholar
18. Merleau-Ponty, M. La Structure du Comportement. Paris: Presses Univ., 1949.Google Scholar
19. Naville, P. Les Conditions de la Liberté. Paris: Ed. de Sagittaire, 1947.Google Scholar
20. Snygg, D. and Combs, A. W. Individual Behavior: a new frame of reference for psychology. N. Y.: Harper, 1949.Google Scholar
21. Tilquin, A. Le Béhaviorisme: Origine et Développement de la Psychologie de Réaction en Amérique. 2nd ed. Paris: J. Virn, 1950.Google Scholar
22. De Waelhens, A. “La Phénoménologie du Corps.” Rev. philos., Louvain, 1950, 48, 354–397.Google Scholar