Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:48:12.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability and Explanatory Significance of Some Simple Evolutionary Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brian Skyrms*
Affiliation:
Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California, Irvine
*
Send requests for reprints to the author, Logic and Philosophy of Science, 3151 Social Science Plaza, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, Ca. 92697-5100.

Abstract

The explanatory significance of equilibrium depends on the underlying dynamics. A number of questions of stability and robustness are relevant. Here I investigate these questions with respect to some simple evolutionary models from my book, Evolution of the Social Contract. These models use the replicator dynamics. In each of these models I identify the equilibria and characterize their local dynamic stability properties. In two of the models, I show that one equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable. I then show that the foregoing results are robust over a large class of adaptive dynamics that might be considered as alternatives to the replicator dynamics. I investigate the structural stability properties of the three models. The question of the structural stability of a model of bargaining with correlated encounters raised by D'Arms, Batterman, and Górny (1998) is answered in the affirmative. The other two models are not structurally stable. Modification of a structurally unstable signaling system to allow for correlated encounters results in a structurally stable model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Bruce Bennett for a tutorial on structural stability and Morse-Smale systems, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions.

References

Alexander, Jason (1999), “The (Spatial) Evolution of the Equal Split”, Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Science, U. California Irvine.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jason and Skyrms, Brian (1999), “Bargaining with Neighbors: Is Justice Contagious?”, Journal of Philosophy XCVI: 588598.Google Scholar
Andronov, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich and others (1971), Theory of Bifurcations of Dynamical Systems on a Plane (tr. from the Russian original of 1967). Jerusalem: Israel Program of Scientific Translations.Google Scholar
Barrett, Martin, Eells, Ellery, Fitelson, Branden, and Sober, Elliott (1999), “Models and Reality: A Review of Brian Skyrms's Evolution of the Social Contract”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina (1999), “Local Fairness”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 229236.10.2307/2653473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken, Gale, John, and Samuelson, Larry, (1995) “Learning to be Imperfect: The Ultimatum Game”, Games and Economic Behavior 8: 5690.Google Scholar
Björnerstedt, Jonas and Weibull, Jorgen (1996), “Nash Equilibrium and Evolution by Imitation”, in Arrow, K. et al. (eds.) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 155171.Google Scholar
Bolton, Gary (1997), “The Rationality of Splitting Equally”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32: 365381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary. (forthcoming), “Motivation and the Games People Play”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Bomze, Immanuel (1991), “Cross-Entropy Minimization in Uninvadable States of Complex Populations”, Journal of Mathematical Biology 30: 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomze, Immanuel. (1986) “Non-Cooperative Two Person Games in Biology: A Classification”, International Journal of Game Theory 15: 3159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgers, Tilman and Sarin, Rajiv (1997), “Learning Through Reinforcement and the Replicator Dynamics”, Journal of Economic Theory 77: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Jeffrey (forthcoming), “Blurring the Line Between Rationality and Evolution”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
D'Arms, Justin (1996), “Sex, Fairness and the Theory of Games”, Journal of Philosophy 96: 615727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arms, Justin. (forthcoming) “When Evolutionary Game Theory Explains Morality, What Does It Explain?”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
D'Arms, Justin, Batterman, Robert, and Górny, Krzyzstof (1998), “Game Theoretic Explanations and the Evolution of Justice”, Philosophy of Science 65: 76102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert (forthcoming), “Classical vs. Evolutionary Game Theory”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Guckenheimer, John and Holmes, Philip (1986), Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Güth, Sandra and Güth, Werner (forthcoming), “Rational Deliberation versus Behavioral Adaptation: Theoretical Perspectives and Experimental Evidence”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Harms, William (forthcoming), “The Evolution of Cooperation in Hostile Environments”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Morris and Smale, Stephen (1974), Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hofbauer, Josef and Sigmund, Karl (1988), The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1999), “Games Social Animals Play: Commentary on Brian Skyrms' Evolution on the Social Contract”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 221228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Dennis (forthcoming), “Evolutionary Games and Morality”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Mar, Gary (forthcoming), “Evolutionary Game Theory, Morality and Darwinism”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Maynard-Smith, John and Price, George (1973), “The Logic of Animal Conflicts”, Nature 246: 1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, Randolf (forthcoming), “Strategic Subjective Commitment”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Peixoto, M. M. (1962), “Structural Stability on Two-Dimensional ManifoldTopology 1: 101120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proulx, Christopher (forthcoming), “Distributive Justice and the Nash Bargaining Solution”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Sacco, Pier Luigi (1995), “Comment” in Arrow, K. et al. (eds.), The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 155171.Google Scholar
Schlag, Karl (1998), “Why Imitate, and If So How? A Bounded Rational Approach to the Multi-Armed Bandits”, Journal of Economic Theory 78: 130156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (1994), “Darwin meets The Logic of Decision”, Philosophy of Science 61: 503528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. (1996), Evolution of the Social Contract. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. (1997), “Chaos and the Explanatory Significance of Equilibrium: Strange Attractors in Evolutionary Game Dynamics”, in C. Bicchieri et al. (eds.), The Dynamics of Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press, 199222.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. (1999), “Precis of Evolution of the Social Contract” and “Reply to Critics”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 217–220 and 243254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. (forthcoming), “Game Theory, Rationality and Evolution of the Social Contract” and “Reply to Commentary”, Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
Smale, Stephen (1980), The Dynamics of Time: Essays on Dynamical Systems, Economic Processes and Related Topics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter and Jonker, Leo (1978), “Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics”, Mathematical Biosciences 40: 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Damme, Eric (1987), Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibull, Jorgen (1997), Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar