Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:29:39.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Jonathan Bain’s CPT Invariance and the Spin-Statistics Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Noel Swanson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 530 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borchers, Hans Jürgen. 1992. “The CPT-Theorem in Two-Dimensional Theories of Local Observables.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 143:315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchers, Hans Jürgen 2000. “On Revolutionizing Quantum Field Theory with Tomita’s Modular Theory.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 41 (6): 3604–73..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratteli, Ola, and Robinson, Derek W. 1981. Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Detlev, Dreyer, Olaf, Florig, Martin, and Summers, Stephen J. 2000. “Geometric Modular Action and Spacetime Symmetries.” Reviews in Mathematical Physics 12:475–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, Richard J., Landshoff, Peter V., Olive, David I., and Polkinghorne, John C. 1966. The Analytic S-Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaier, Johanna, and Yngvason, Jakob. 2000. “Geometric Modular Action, Wedge Duality, and Lorentz Covariance Are Equivalent for Generalized Free Fields.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 41:5910–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guido, Daniele, and Longo, Roberto. 1995. “An Algebraic Spin and Statistics Theorem.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 172:517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haag, Rudolf. 1996. Local Quantum Physics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksak, A. I., and Todorov, Ivan. 1968. “Invalidity of TCP-Theorem for Infinite-Component Fields.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 11:125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streater, Raymond F. 1967. “Local Fields with the Wrong Connection between Spin and Statistics.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 5:88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Noel. 2017. “A Philosopher’s Guide to the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory.” Philosophy Compass 12 (5). doi:10.1111/phc3.12414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 2005. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar