Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:20:52.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Munson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Hugh Lehman
Hugh Lehman*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 125 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hull, D., “The Effects of Essentialism on Taxonomy,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vols. XV, XVI, No. 60, 61, 1965.Google Scholar
[2] Gilmour, G. S. L., “Taxonomy and Philosophy,” The New Systematics (ed. Huxley, J. S.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1940, pp. 461–474.Google Scholar
[3] Lehman, H., “Are Biological Species Real,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 34, No. 2, 1967 (June), pp. 157–167.10.1086/288139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Munson, R., “Biological Species: Mr. Lehman's Thesis,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, No. 1, 1970 (March).10.1086/288284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Simpson, G. G., Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York, 1961.10.7312/simp92414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Smith, J. M., The Theory of Evolution, Penguin Books, Baltimore, 1958.Google Scholar