Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T20:34:10.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: The Clock Paradox, or How to Get Rid of Absolute Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Kroes
Peter Kroes*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences University of Technology of Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 159 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohm, D. (1965), The Special Theory of Relativity. Benjamin, N. Y. ch. XXX.Google Scholar
Kroes, P. (1982), An Inquiry into the Structure of Physical Time. Doctoral Dissertation, Catholic Univ. of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1957), The Philosophy of Space and Time. Dover Publ., N.Y.Google Scholar
Schlegel, R. (1977), “The Clock Paradox: Some New Thoughts”, Philosophy of Science 44: 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingard, R. (1977), “Review of P. C. W. Davies, Space and Time in the Modern Universe“, Nature and System 1: 60–70.Google Scholar
Weingard, R. (1981), “Review of R. Schlegel, Superposition and Interaction“, Nature and System 3: 243–251.Google Scholar