Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:48:11.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Criterion of Probabilistic Causation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Charles R. Twardy  and
Kevin B. Korb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The investigation of probabilistic causality has been plagued by a variety of misconceptions and misunderstandings. One has been the thought that the aim of the probabilistic account of causality is the reduction of causal claims to probabilistic claims. Nancy Cartwright (1979) has clearly rebutted that idea. Another ill-conceived idea continues to haunt the debate, namely the idea that contextual unanimity can do the work of objective homogeneity. It cannot. We argue that only objective homogeneity in combination with a causal interpretation of Bayesian networks can provide the desired criterion of probabilistic causality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 241 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

We are grateful to Christoper Hitchcock, Dan Hausman, Peter Moulder, Michaelis Michael, Lucas Hope and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. NSF grant SES 99-06565 provided partial support for this work.

References

Cartwright, Nancy (1979), “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies”, Causal Laws and Effective Strategies 13:419–437. Reprinted and expanded in her 1983 book of the same title.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Church, Alonzo (1940), “On the Concept of Random Sequence”, On the Concept of Random Sequence 46:130–135.Google Scholar
Cooper, Gregory (1999), “An Overview of the Representation and Discovery of Causal Relationships Using Bayesian Networks”, in Glymour, Clark and Cooper, Gregory F. (eds.), Computation, Causation and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Development and Evaluation Service (1996), Factor V Leiden screening in oral contraceptive users. Technical Report 58, R&D Directorate, South and West Regional Health Authority, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR. http://www.doh.gov.uk/research/swro/rd/publicat/dec/dec58.htm, using data from the 1994 Leiden thrombophilia study and others.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John, and Cartwright, Nancy (1988), “Probability and Causality: Why Hume and Indeterminism Don't Mix.”, Probability and Causality: Why Hume and Indeterminism Don't Mix. 22(4): 521–536.Google Scholar
Eells, Ellery (1985), “Probabilistic Causality: Reply to John Dupré”, Probabilistic Causality: Reply to John Dupré 54:105–114.Google Scholar
Eells, Ellery (1988), “Probabilistic Causal Levels”, in Skyrms, Brian and Harper, William L. (eds.), Causation, Chance and Credence. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, Ellery, and Sober, Elliott (1983), “Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity”, Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity 50:35–57.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart (2002), “Contextual Unanimity and the Units of Selection Problem”, Contextual Unanimity and the Units of Selection Problem 69:118–137.Google Scholar
Halpern, Joseph Y., and Pearl, Judea (2001), “Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach-Part II: Explanations”, in Proceedings of the seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence–IJCAI-01. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 27–34.Google Scholar
Hesslow, Germund (1976), “Discussion: Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality”, Discussion: Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality 43:290–292.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher R. (2001a), “Causal Generalizations and Good Advice”, Causal Generalizations and Good Advice 84:222–246.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher R. (2001b), “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs”, The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs 158(6): 273–299.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher R. (2002), “Good Advice”, in Kyburg, Henry Jr. and Thalos, Mariam (eds.), Probability is the Very Guide of Life: A Poor Folks' Guide to the Uses of Probability. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1989), The Chances of Explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Korb, Kevin B. (1999), “Probabilistic Causal Structure”, in Sankey, Howard (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 265–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korb, Kevin B., and Nicholson, Ann E., (2003), Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, John (1993), “Causes and Conditions”, in Sosa, Ernest and Tooley, Michael (eds.), Causation. Oxford Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 33–55.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter (2002), “Difference Making in Context”, in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Counterfactuals and Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter (forthcoming), “The Causal Efficacy of Mental States”, in Monnoyer, Jean-Maurice (ed.), The Structure of the World: the Renewal of Metaphysics in the Australian School. Paris: Vrin Publishers.Google Scholar
Neapolitan, Richard E. (2003), “Stochastic Causality”, paper presented at the International Conference on Cognitive Science, Sydney, Australia, July 2003. Slides at http://www.neiu.edu/reneapol/chapters.htm.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan and Kaufman.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea (2000), Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1970), “Statistical Explanation”, in Colodny, Robert G. (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 173–231. Reprinted in Salmon et al. 1971.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1974), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1980), “Probabilistic Causality”, Probabilistic Causality 61:50–74.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (1980), Causal Necessity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clark, and Scheines, Richard (2000), Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, Patrick (1970), A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall (1934), “The Method of Path Coefficients”, The Method of Path Coefficients 5(3):161–215.Google Scholar