Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T17:57:51.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control and Unfreedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Felix E. Oppenheim
Felix E. Oppenheim*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Introduction. Now that operationalism has evolved from a battle cry of a militant minority to a widely accepted maxim of scientific method, and has in the process lost much of its initial intransigeance, it seems time to devote more attention to the application of operational analysis to the social sciences. This paper attempts to explicate some basic concepts in the behavioral sciences, both individual and social, namely, ‘control’ and ‘unfreedom,’ as well as the concepts by which they will be defined, such as ‘persuasion,’ ‘constraint,’ ‘deprivation,’ and ‘punishment’. This analysis will enable us to ascertain with greater precision some of the rather intricate connections which exist between these relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1955 , pp. 280 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Carritt, E. F., Ethical and Political Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947.Google Scholar
2. Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, “Psychoanalysis and the Unity of Science,” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 80, No. 4 (1954).Google Scholar
3. Hempel, Carl G., “A Logical Appraisal of Operationism,” The Scientific Monthly, Vol. 79, No. 4 (1954).Google Scholar
4. Lasswell, Harold D., and Kaplan, Abraham, Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
5. Oppenheim, Felix E., “Interpersonal Freedom and Freedom of Action,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 49, No. 2 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Simon, Herbert A., “Notes on the Observation and Measurement of Political Power,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 15, No. 4 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar