Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T10:35:17.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Causal Models, Token Causation, and Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

Judea Pearl (2000) has recently advanced a theory of token causation using his structural equations approach. This paper examines some counterexamples to Pearl's theory, and argues that the theory can be modified in a natural way to overcome them.

Type
Causation and Bayesian Networks
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Halpern, David, and Pearl, Judea (2001), Causes and Explanations: A Structural Model Approach—Part I: Causes. Technical Report R-266, Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher (2001), “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs”, The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs 98:273314.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher (2002a), “Token Causation and the Principle of Sufficient Reason”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher (2002b), “Active Routes and Token Causation”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1973), Counterfactuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter (1996), “Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-emption Problem”, Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-emption Problem 105:85117.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter (2003), “Difference-Making in Context”, in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, Laurie (eds.), Counterfactuals and Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea (2000), Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar