Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:15:12.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Distinctions: Entities, Structures, and Changes in Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Angelo Cei
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that the pessimistic meta-induction (PMI) seems to point an ontological priority of the relations over the objects of the scientific theories of the kind suggested by French and Ladyman (2003). My strategy will involve a critical examination of epistemic structural realism (ESR) and an historical case-study: the prediction of Zeeman's effect in Lorentz's theory of the electron.

Type
Structural Realism
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 1385 - 1396
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I wish to thank Steven French for patient suggestions, corrections, and advice. Discussions with Juha Saatsi and with the people of HPS and Postgraduate informal seminars of the School of Philosophy of the University of Leeds helped me to clarify the philosophical aspects of the work. I am in debt to Sara Lombardi for illuminating discussions on the physics. Mauro Dorato and Joseph Melia kindly read and carefully commented on earlier versions of this work.

References

Arabatzis, Theodore (2001), “The Zeeman Effect and the Discovery of the Electron”, in Buchwald, Jed Z. and Warwick, Andrew (eds.), Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buchwald, John (1985), From Maxwell to Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Salvo (1973), “L’elettrodinamica di Lorentz sino alla soglia della teoria della relatività di Einstein”, L’elettrodinamica di Lorentz sino alla soglia della teoria della relatività di Einstein 15:260–279.Google Scholar
Darrigol, Olivier (1994), “The Electron Theories of Larmor and Lorentz: A Comparative Study”, The Electron Theories of Larmor and Lorentz: A Comparative Study 24:265–336.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (2003), “Remodeling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure”, Remodeling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure 136:31–56.Google Scholar
Kox, A. J. (1997), “The Discovery of Electron: The Zeeman Effect”, The Discovery of Electron: The Zeeman Effect 18:139–144.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae, and Lewis, David (1998), “Defining Intrinsic”, in Lewis, David, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1981), “A Refutation of Convergent Realism”, A Refutation of Convergent Realism 48:19–49.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1970), “How to Define Theoretical Terms”, How to Define Theoretical Terms 67:427–446Google Scholar
Lewis, David (2001), “Redefining Intrinsic”, Redefining Intrinsic 53:381–391.Google Scholar
Lorentz, Hendrick Antoon ([1892] 1935–1939), “La théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants”, in Zeeman, P. and Fokker, A. D. (eds.), Collected Papers, Vol. 2. The Hague: Nijhoff, 163–343.Google Scholar
Lorentz, Hendrick Antoon ([1895] 1935–1939), “Versuch Einer Theorie der Electrischen und Optischen Erscheinungen in Bewetgen Körpen”, in Zeeman, P. and Fokker, A. D. (eds.), Collected Papers, Vol. 5. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1–139.Google Scholar
McCormmach, Russell (1970), “H. A. Lorentz and the Electromagnetic View of Nature”, H. A. Lorentz and the Electromagnetic View of Nature 61:459–497.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2001) “Is Structural Realism Possible?”, Is Structural Realism Possible? 68 (Supplement): S13–S24.Google Scholar
Warwick, Andrew (1993), “Frequency, Theorem and Formula: Remembering Joseph Larmor in Electromagnetic Theory”, Frequency, Theorem and Formula: Remembering Joseph Larmor in Electromagnetic Theory 47:49–60.Google Scholar
Worrall, John (1989),“Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43:99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, Peeter (1897),“On the Influence of Magnetism on the Nature of the Light Emitted by a Substance”, On the Influence of Magnetism on the Nature of the Light Emitted by a Substance 43:226–239.Google Scholar
Zeeman, Peeter (1913), Researches in Magneto-optics: With Special References to the Magnetic Resolution of Spectrum Lines. London: McMillan.Google Scholar