Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:23:05.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reasons for the Failure of Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Ernst Mayr*
Affiliation:
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University
*
Send reprint requests to the author, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Abstract

A theory may be invalid, not owing to erroneous observations or the invocation of an inappropriate law, but because of the use of equivocal terms. This is demonstrated for Darwin's failed model of sympatric speciation through the principle of divergence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bock, W. and Wahlert, G. von (1965), “Adaptation and the Form-Function Complex”, Evolution 19: 269299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1975), Natural Selection. Edited by Stauffer, R. C. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1961), “Cause and Effect in Biology”, Science 134: 15011506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (1991), One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1992a), “Darwin's Principle of Divergence”, Journal of the History of Biology 125: 343359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1992b), “The Idea of Teleology”, Journal of the History of Ideas 53: 117135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1993), “Proximate and Ultimate Causations”, Biology and Philosophy 8: 9394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar