Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T03:17:53.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Complexity in Biology: Some Epistemological and Historical Remarks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Hans-Jörg Rheinberger
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
*
†Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Wilhelmstr. 44, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

My paper draws on examples from molecular biology, the details of which I have developed elsewhere (Rheinberger 1992, 1993, 1995, 1997). Here, I can give only a brief outline of my argument. Reduction of complexity is a prerequisite for experimental research. To make sense of the universe of living beings, the modern biologist is bound to divide his world into fragments in which parameters can be defined, quantities measured, qualities identified. Such is the nature of any “experimental system.” Ontic complexity has to be reduced in order to make experimental research possible. The complexity of the research object, however, is epistemically retained in the rich context of an experimental landscape, where the eruption of “volcanic systems” can change the scenery dramatically as the result of particular, unprecedented findings.

Type
Symposium: Complexity and Experimentation in Molecular Biology
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S245 - S254
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Richard Burian and Lindley Darden are acknowledged for their patience, help, and criticism.

References

Bachelard, G. (1966), La Philosophie du Non, 4th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. C. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coveney, P. and Highfield, R. (1995), Frontiers of Complexity: The Search for Order in a Chaotic World. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972a), The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972b), The Discourse on Language. Translated by Rupert Swyer. Published as an appendix to The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Grene, M. (1984), The Knower and the Known. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, F. (1988), The Statue Within. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1995), At Home in the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1995), The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1992), “Experiment, Difference, and Writing. I. Tracing Protein Synthesis,” and “II. The Laboratory Production of transfer RNA”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 305–331, 389–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1993), “Experiment and Orientation. Early Systems of in Vitro Protein Synthesis,” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 443–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1995), “From Microsomes to Ribosomes: ‘”Strategies’ of ‘Representation‘“, Journal of the History of Biology 28: 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997), Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. (1991), “Reductionism and Functional Explanation in Molecular Biology”, Uroboros 1: 67–94.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. (1987), “Coping with the Imprecision of the Real World”, in Yager, R. R., Ovchinnikov, S., Tong, R. M., and Nguyen, H. T. (eds.), Fuzzy Sets and Applications: Selected Papers by Lofti A. Zadeh. New York: John Wiley, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar