Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T19:25:13.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging the Gap between Human Kinds and Biological Kinds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Marc Ereshefsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many writers claim that human kinds are significantly different from biological and natural kinds. Some suggest that humans kinds are unique because social structures are essential for the etiology of human kinds. Others argue that human cultural evolution is decidedly different from other forms of evolution. In this paper I suggest that the gulf between humans and our biological relatives is not as wide as some argue. There is a taxonomic difference between human and nonhuman organisms, but such factors as social structure and cultural evolution do not distinguish us from many other organisms.

Type
Biological Kinds and Human Kinds
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 912 - 921
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

My thanks to John Dupré, Jesse Hendrikse, Mohan Matthen, Robert Ware, Bill Wimsatt, and Scott Woodcock for their helpful comments. Thanks to Clement Loo for his help as a research assistant. Funding for research on this paper was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

Boyd, Richard, and Silk, Joan (2000), How Humans Evolved, 2nd Edition. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Byrne, Richard, and Russon, Anne (1998), “Learning Imitation: A Hierarchical Approach”, Learning Imitation: A Hierarchical Approach 21:667–721.Google ScholarPubMed
Callicott, Baird (1999), Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1995), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (2001), Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, William (1991), Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul (2000), Human Natures: Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Richard (1997), Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia, and Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, E. (1990), “Grammatical Combination in Panpaniscus: Processes of Learning and Invention in the Evolution and Development of Language”, in Parker, S. and Gibson, K. (eds.), “Language” and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 540–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1991), “A Tradition of Natural Kinds”, A Tradition of Natural Kinds 61:109–126.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1992), “Making Up People”, in Stein, E. (ed.), Forms of Desire: Sexual Orientation and the Social Constructionist Controversy. New York: Routledge, 69–88.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1995), Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, Tecmseh (2002), “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?”, The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? 298:1569–1579.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard (1983), “Gene, Organism, and Environment”, in Bendall, D. (ed.), Evolution: From Molecules to Men. New York: Cambridge University Press, 273–285.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, and Szarthmáry, Eörs (1999), The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mercader, Julio, et al. (2002), “Excavation of Chimpanzee Stone Tool Site in the African Rainforest”, Excavation of Chimpanzee Stone Tool Site in the African Rainforest 296:1452–1455.Google ScholarPubMed
Morgan, Drake, et al. (2002), “Social Dominance in Monkeys: Dopamine D2 Receptors and Cocaine Self-Administration”, Social Dominance in Monkeys: Dopamine D2 Receptors and Cocaine Self-Administration 5:169–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Oyama, Susan (1985), The Ontogeny of Information. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Edward (1998), “Essentialism and Constructionism about Sexual Orientation”, in Hull, D. and Ruse, M. (eds.), The Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 427–442.Google Scholar
Tattersall, Ian (1998), Becoming Human: Evolution and Human Uniqueness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Whiten, Andrew, and Boesch, Christopher (2001), “The Cultures of Chimpanzees”, The Cultures of Chimpanzees 284:60–67.Google ScholarPubMed