Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-scc96 Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2021-06-22T18:27:10.686Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Policy Feedback and Interdependence in American Federalism: Evidence from Rooftop Solar Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Abstract

Scholars have long understood the American states as “laboratories of democracy,” exploring how mechanisms of learning and competition lead to the diffusion of successful state policy experiments across the federal system. Drawing from policy feedback literature, I develop a new framework for studying policy interdependence in American federalism. I argue that state policies can, in addition to promoting learning and competition, also feed into the interest group politics in other states. Broadly speaking, the organized interests that benefit from, and are strengthened by, particular policy reforms might apply newfound strength to propagate them. Empirically, I study rooftop solar policy, an area in which state-level decisions have been fundamental to industry growth and the emergence of installers as political actors. Bringing together a variety of administrative, lobbying, and policy data, I demonstrate that solar installers used resources accumulated in early adopter of favorable rooftop solar policies to influence policy decisions elsewhere. For reformers, I suggest that subnational policy can be a crucial ingredient in building coalitions for (geographically) broader policy reform.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AXQXYP

References

Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn Steffan. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Energy Outlook 2019. 2019. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F. 2018. “Looking for Influence in All the Wrong Places: How Studying Subnational Policy Can Revive Research on Interest Groups.” Journal of Politics 81(1): 343-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Moe, Terry M.. 2016. “Do Politicians Use Policy to Make Politics? The Case of Public-Sector Labor Laws.” American Political Science Review 110(4): 763–77.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 29(3): 221–45.Google Scholar
Barbose, Galen. 2018. Putting the Potential Rate Impacts of Distributed Solar into Context. Retrieved March 21, 2019 (http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1469160/).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Beth, L, Leech, . 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, and Hoffmann, Matthew. 2018. “The Politics of Decarbonization and the Catalytic Impact of Subnational Climate Experiments.” Policy Sciences 51(2): 189211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84(2): 395415.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Witmer, Richard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Louis. 1932. (Supreme Court of the United States) New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., Volden, Craig, Dynes, Adam M., and Shor, Boris. 2017. “Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, , , Andrea Louise. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Robert L. 1966. “Fluoridation: The Diffusion of an Innovation among Cities.” Social Forces 44(4): 467–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmofal, David, Kelly, Nathan J., Witko, Christopher, and Young, Sarah. 2019. “Federalism, Government Liberalism, and Union Weakness in America.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19(4): 428–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald, Ackerman, Bruce A., and Millian, John C.. 1985. “Toward a Theory of Statutory Evolution: The Federalization of Environmental Law.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 1(2): 313–40.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, James, Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2018. From the Bargaining Table to the Ballot Box: Political Effects of Right to Work Laws. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved April 14, 2018 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w24259.pdf).Google Scholar
Finger, Leslie K., and Hartney, Michael T.. 2019. “Financial Solidarity: The Future of Unions in the Post-Janus Era.” Perspectives on Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592719003438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N., and Jansa, Joshua M.. 2015. “Interest Group Influence in Policy Diffusion Networks.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(3): 387417.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, Füglister, Katharina, and Luyet, Stéphane. 2009. “Learning from Others: The Diffusion of Hospital Financing Reforms in OECD Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 42(4): 549–73.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Wasserfallen, Fabio. 2019. “The Politics of Policy Diffusion.” European Journal of Political Research 58(4): 1245–56.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67(4): 1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William. 2008. “Functional Forms for the Negative Binomial Model for Count Data.” Economics Letters 99(3): 585–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzins, Morton, ed. 1982. American System: A New View of Government in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2019. Red State Blues: How the Conservative Revolution Stalled in the States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach, Jacob M. 2018. “From Backwaters to Major Policymakers: Policy Polarization in the States, 1970–2014.” Perspectives on Politics 16(2): 416–35.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2001. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1): 526.Google Scholar
Henig, Jeffrey R., Jacobsen, Rebecca, and Reckhow, Sarah. 2019. Outside Money in School Board Elections: The Nationalization of Education Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alex. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States––and the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2018. “Policy Feedback as Political Weapon: Conservative Advocacy and the Demobilization of the Public Sector Labor Movement.” Perspectives on Politics 16(2): 364–79.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Skocpol, Theda, and Lynch, Daniel. 2016. “Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War over Medicaid Expansion.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 41(2): 239–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
“House Letter to the USITC.” 2017. August 11. Congress of the United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC 20515-0501 (https://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/Solar%20ITC%20Letter%20final%20SIGNED%20w%20add-ons.pdf).Google Scholar
Kaneya, Rui, and Yerardi, Joe. 2018. Out of State Donors Pour Cash into Democrats’ State Races. Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved March 14, 2020 (https://publicintegrity.org/politics/state-politics/out-of-state-donors-pour-cash-into-democrats-state-races/).Google Scholar
Kavlak, Goksin, McNerney, James, and Trancik, Jessika E.. 2018. “Evaluating the Causes of Cost Reduction in Photovoltaic Modules.” Energy Policy 123:700–10.Google Scholar
Konisky, David M. 2007. “Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom?American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 853–72.Google Scholar
Linos, Katerina. 2011. “Diffusion through Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 678–95.Google Scholar
Maggetti, Martino, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2016. “Problems (and Solutions) in the Measurement of Policy Diffusion Mechanisms.” Journal of Public Policy 36(1): 87107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckling, Jonas, and Hughes, Llewelyn. 2018. “Global Interdependence in Clean Energy Transitions.” Business and Politics 20(4): 467–91.Google Scholar
Meckling, Jonas, Kelsey, Nina, Biber, Eric, and Zysman, John. 2015. “Winning Coalitions for Climate Policy.” Science 349(6253): 1170–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meckling, Jonas, and Trachtman, Samuel. 2021. “The Home State Effect on National Business Coalitions: Evidence from U.S. Climate Politics.” APSA pre-prints. DOI: 10.33774/apsa-2021-bn5gpCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2014. Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Sabotaged the American Dream. Illustrated Edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2018. Fragmented Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.” Journal of Politics 60(1): 126–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry. 2011. Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America’s Public Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2015. “Vested Interests and Political Institutions.” Political Science Quarterly 130(2): 277318.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2012. “The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation across the American States.” Journal of Politics 74(1): 187202.Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. 2008. Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45(4): 595628.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Potoski, Matthew. 2001. “Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?Public Administration Review 61(3): 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Barry. 2008. “States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Climate Policy.” Review of Policy Research 25(2): 105–28.Google Scholar
Rogers, Steven. 2017. “Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation.” American Political Science Review 111(3): 555–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles, and Volden, Craig. 2014. “When the Smoke Clears: Expertise, Learning and Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Public Policy 34(3): 357–87.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC).” 2019. SEIA. Retrieved August 16, 2019 (https://www.seia.org/initiatives/solar-investment-tax-credit-itc).Google Scholar
Stokes, Leah. 2020. Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Leah C., and Breetz, Hanna L.. 2018. “Politics in the U.S. Energy Transition: Case Studies of Solar, Wind, Biofuels and Electric Vehicles Policy.” Energy Policy 113(Supplement C): 7686.Google Scholar
Stoutenborough, James W., and Beverlin, Matthew. 2008. “Encouraging Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies.” Social Science Quarterly 89(5): 1230–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–24.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Samuel. 2019. “Building Climate Policy in the States.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 685(1): 96114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Samuel. 2020. “When State Policy Makes National Politics: The Case of ‘Obamacare’ Marketplace Implementation.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45(1): 111–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Steven K. 2018. Marketcraft: How Governments Make Markets Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2002. “The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 352–63.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2005. “Intergovernmental Political Competition in American Federalism.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 327–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294312.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesoff, Eric. 2010. “Solar Power Year in Review 2010.” August 16, 2019 (https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/top-ten-solar-items-2010).Google Scholar
Woods, Neal D. 2006. “Interstate Competition and Environmental Regulation: A Test of the Race-to-the-Bottom Thesis.” Social Science Quarterly 87(1): 174–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Trachtman Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Trachtman supplementary material

Appendix

Download Trachtman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 220 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Policy Feedback and Interdependence in American Federalism: Evidence from Rooftop Solar Politics
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Policy Feedback and Interdependence in American Federalism: Evidence from Rooftop Solar Politics
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Policy Feedback and Interdependence in American Federalism: Evidence from Rooftop Solar Politics
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *