Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:48:37.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Major Patterns in Botanical Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Peter R. Crane*
Affiliation:
The Field Museum Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605 The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB U.K.
Get access

Extract

At a time when the popular perception of paleontology is dominated by images of dinosaurs and other spectacular vertebrates, or the mysteries surrounding the Cambrian “explosion” of animal life, it is perhaps not surprising that the rich and informative fossil record of plants has scarcely made an impact on the public consciousness. In reality, as one would expect from those organisms that comprise the bulk of the biological material in terrestrial ecosystems, the fossil record of plants is extensive (Stewart and Rothwell, 1993). Leaves, wood fragments, pollen grains, spores, fruits, seeds and other plant parts are the most common fossils in rocks deposited in ancient flood plains, lakes and many other environments - and they are often exquisitely preserved. This excellent fossil record provides important information about the ecology of ancient terrestrial ecosystems. The quality of the plant fossil record also makes paleobotanical data highly informative about the historical pattern of plant evolution. It is this pattern, and its congruence with patterns in the characters of living and fossil plants — as summarized in a classification — that is the focus of this chapter.

Type
Evidence for Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Agassiz, L., 1857. An essay on classification. Part I of the first volume of the Contributions to the natural history of the United States of America. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A., 1998. Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 29: 567599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, L. and Bemis, W. E., 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Memoir 4, Supplement to Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18: 1690.Google Scholar
Kenrick, P. and Crane, P. R., 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants: A cladistic study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 441 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, W.N. and Rothwell, W., 1993. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 521pp.Google Scholar