Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T03:15:07.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Best Practices for Online Paleontology Instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Kevin F. Downing  and
Jennifer K. Holtz
Kevin F. Downing
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Suite 100, 8770 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Chicago, IL 60631-3782 USA
Jennifer K. Holtz
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 S. University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204-1000 USA
Get access

Abstract

The future of any academic field relies on its ability and willingness to embrace change, objectively evaluate the value of that change over time, and adjust accordingly. Paleontology finds itself in a substantial educational paradigm shift with continued growth of online-based education; it has been slow to recognize and respond to the shift. This article describes technological changes facing paleontology education and provides a synthesis of recent literature of what is possible for faculty to adopt, from the simple to the complex. Trends in online learning are evaluated, as are quality issues behind some educator resistance to this learning format. Original research, the SOUP survey, demonstrates less than 2% integration of online technology in paleontology education at the undergraduate level. This new SOUP research is compared to previous work, the SUDSE survey, which showed a marginally greater use of the same technologies across science disciplines. The current best practice in online paleontology instruction should establish learning objectives with an emphasis on targeted levels of competence, rather than content memorization. Moreover, best practice incorporates a variety of online learning options that both novice and experienced online faculty members can successfully manage beyond such basics as enhancing and optimizing communication through course facilitation whether in fully online, blended, or webfacilitated formats. These include use of theme-based, problem-based, and just-in-time learning; incorporating games; maximizing informal paleontology resources, and judicious use of virtual-reality applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 12: Teaching Paleontology in the 21st Century , 2012 , pp. 59 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E., and Seaman, J. 2010. Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010. Babson Survey Research Group and The Sloan Consortium, Babson Park, MA.Google Scholar
Annetta, L., Klesath, M., and Meyer, J. 2009. Taking science online: evaluating resence and immersion through a laboratory experience in a virtual learning environment for entomology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39:27–33.Google Scholar
Benison, K. C. 2005. Artificial outcrops give real experience in interpreting a geologic history: The CMUland group project for historical geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53:501–507 Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green, New York.Google Scholar
Breithaupt, B. H. 2010. Educating fledgling paleontologists in the West: The undergraduate uesearch program at the University of Wyoming. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, P20-14.Google Scholar
Brookfield, S. D. 1988. Developing Critical Thinkers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, S. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18:32–42.Google Scholar
Buckley, S. J., Enge, H. D., Carlsson, C., and Howell, J. A. 2010. Terrestrial laser scanning for use in virtual outcrop geology. The Photogrammetric Record, 25: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clary, R., and Wandersee, J. 2008. Marquee fossils. The Science Teacher, 75: 44–50.Google Scholar
Clary, R. M., and Wandersee, J. H. 2009a. Incorporating informal learning environments and local fossil specimens in earth science classrooms: a recipe for success. Science Education Review, 8: 47–57.Google Scholar
Clary, R. M., and Wandersee, J. H. 2009b. Can Teachers learn in an online Environment? Kappa Delta Pi Record, Fall Issue:34–38.Google Scholar
Clary, R. M., and Wandersee, J. H. 2010. Virtual field exercises in the online classroom: Practicing science teachers' perceptions of effectiveness, best practices, and implementation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39:50–58.Google Scholar
CTGV. 1990. Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19:2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daymont, T., Blau, G., and Campbell, D. 2011. Deciding between traditional and online formats: Exploring the role of learning advantages, flexibility, and compensatory adaptation. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5335/is_201101/ai_n57035150/ Google Scholar
Dickey, M. D. 2005. Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24:17.Google Scholar
Doering, A. 2007. Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate, 3(6). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=342 Google Scholar
Downing, K. F. 1999. Virtual Paleontology: a web-based course for undergraduates. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, 29(7).Google Scholar
Downing, K. F. 2001. Incorporating 3D virtual fossils to enhance web-based learning experiences in paleontology. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, North-Central Scetion.Google Scholar
Downing, K. F., and Holtz, J. K. 2008. Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies. IGI Publishers, Hershey, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, K. F., and Holtz, J. K. 2010. Incorporating 3D virtual laboratory specimens to enhance online science: Examples from paleontology and biology, p. 219–238. In King, K. P., and Cox, T. D. (eds.). The Professor's Guide to Taming Technology: Leveraging Digital Media, Web 2.0. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
Duggan-Haas, D., and Granshaw, F. D. 2011. Constructing virtual field environments. In the Trenches, 1(3). http://nagt.org/nagt/publications/trenches/issues/jul11.html#fourth Google Scholar
Dukes, L. D., and Bartley, J. K. 2010. An introductory paleontology teaching tool, the interactive fossil identification program. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 40(4):7.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A. 2010. Paleontology for pre-service education majors and in-service K-12 educators. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs.Google Scholar
Gilbert, H. 2011. Human fossil record. Retrieved 9-1-11, from http://fossilized.org/Human_paleontology/index.php Google Scholar
Gilman, S. 2006. Do online labs work? An assessment of an online lab on cell division. American Biology Teacher 68:131–34.Google Scholar
Ginns, P., and Ellis, R. 2007. Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between online and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10:53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresh, K. S., and Mrozowski, S. 2000. Faculty/student interaction at a distance: Seeking balance. Paper presented at EDUCAUSE 2000 in Nashville, TN. October 10–13, 2000. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/facultystudent-interaction-distance-seeking-balance Google Scholar
Guertin, L. A., Zappe, S. E., and Kim, H. 2007. Just-in-time teaching exercises to engage students in an introductory-level dinosaur course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16:507–514.Google Scholar
Hasse, J., and Colvard, C. 2006. Inverse distance learning: Digitally enhancing a geography field-course. Journal of Geography, 105: 167–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, J. K. 2002. Effect of graduate medical education on the divergent thinking and problem finding abilities of resident physicians: a pilot study. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, 190 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2002. Introductory biology “online”: Assessing outcomes of two student populations. Journal of College Science Teaching 31:312–17.Google Scholar
Jones, T. C., and Laughlin, T. F. 2010. PopGen Fishbowl: A free online simulation hodel of microevolutionary processes. The American Biology Teacher, 72: 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Visaggi, C. C. 2010. Publishable research project into an invertebrate paleontology laboratory course. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 42(5):129.Google Scholar
Kennelly, P. J. 2009. An online social networking approach to reinforce learning of rocks and minerals. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57:33–40 Google Scholar
Kennepohl, D., and Shaw, L. 2010. Accessible Elements: Teaching Science Online and at a Distance. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Ketelhut, D. J. 2007. The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. The Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S., Greidanus, E., Carbonaro, M., Drummond, J., Boechler, P., and Kahlke, R. 2010. Synchronous problem-based e-learning (ePBL) in interprofessional health science education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9:133–150.Google Scholar
Koy, K. A. 2010. Will it rot? Developing undergraduate science skills in the classroom. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 42(5):69.Google Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1990. Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Lockwood, R. 2010. Contemplating course design in undergraduate paleontology: Is it time to move beyond the “March of the Phyla?” Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 42(5):67.Google Scholar
Lovell, K., and Vignare, K. 2009. MSU medical colleges blended learning for first year science courses: Uniting pedagogy to maximize experience and real world limitations. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13:55–63.Google Scholar
MacFadden, B. J. 2010. Engaging undergraduates in informal geoscience experiences. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program.Google Scholar
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., and Jones, K. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 9-1-2011 from www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf Google Scholar
Metzger, K. J. 2011. Helping students conceptualize species divergence events using the online tool “TimeTree: The Timescale of Life.” The American Biology Teacher, 73: 106–108.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., and Forer, P. 2010. Blended learning: The perceptions of first-year geography students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, H. 2003. The evolution of an undergraduate service course—how to cope with success of an Age of Dinosaurs class. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51:299–303.Google Scholar
Oblinger, D. 2006. Simulations, games, and learning. Retrieved May 1, 2007 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3004.pdf Google Scholar
Pena, J. M., Chamoso, J. M., and Urones, C. 2011. The efieldbook program: A teaching resource for geology. Computers and Geosciences, 37:573–581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciano, A. G., and Steiner, R. V. 2008. Bringing the real world of science to children: A partnership of the American Museum of Natural History and the City University of New York. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12:1–16.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E. 2007. SWOTing at Paleontology. American Paleontologist, 15:21–23.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 2008. Teaching paleontology: from the idiographic to the nomothetic. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 40(6):426.Google Scholar
Quintana, C., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. 2002. Scaffolding design guidelines for learner-centered software environments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Reuss, R. L., and Gardulski, A. F. 2001. An interactive game approach to learning in historical geology and paleontology. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49:120–129 Google Scholar
Reuter, R. 2009. Online versus in the classroom: Student success in a hands-on lab class. The American Journal of Distance Education, 23:151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, D., Karampiperis, P., and Fytros, D. 2007. Developing a common metadata model for competencies description. Interactive Learning Environments, 15:137–150.Google Scholar
Scacchi, W., Nideffer, R., and Adams, J. 2008. Collaborative game environments for informal science education: DinoQuest and DinoQuest Online. Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS 2008), May 19–23, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
Science Education Resource Center. 2009. Course Goals. Retrieved August 7, 2011, http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/paleo/goals.html.Google Scholar
Scotchmoor, J., and Thanukos, A. 2007. Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. McGill Journal of Education, 42:225–244.Google Scholar
Scotchmoor, J., Thanukos, A., and Potter, S. 2009. Improving the public understanding of science: New initiatives. American Journal of Botany, 96:1760–1766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seok, S., Dacosta, B., Kinsell, C., and Tung, C. K. 2010. Comparison of instructors' and students' perceptions of the effectiveness of online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11:25–36.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, D., and Ruse, M., EDS. 2009. The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. D., and Caruso, J. B. 2010. ECAR Study of undergraduate students and information Technology, 2010. Retrieved 8-1-2011, http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EKF/EKF1006.pdf Google Scholar
Soja, C. M. 2010. Reefs as the centralizing theme in an undergraduate paleontology course. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 42(5):67.Google Scholar
Stemmler, R. 2006. The power to educate and inspire. Alcheringa Special Issue, 1:307–312.Google Scholar
Strait, S. G., and Smith, N. E. 2010. Paloeview3D.org: An example of science education through the development of an open access paleontological data resource. Geological Society of America Abstracts.Google Scholar
Strang, K. D. 2011. Knowledge articulation dialog increases online university science course outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 16:123–137 Google Scholar
Tapanila, L., Ames, D. P., Thomason, C., Sammons, D., Agamba, J., and Sheffield, J. 2009. Improving student reading and interpretation of paleontologic graph data with FossilPlot: A preliminary assessment. Geological Society of America Abstracts.Google Scholar
Thanukos, A., Scotchmoor, J. G., Caldwell, R., and Lindberg, D. R. 2010. Science 101: Building the foundations for real understanding. Science, 330:1764–1765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoms, K. J. 2005. Kicking and screaming: Overcoming faculty resistance to teaching online courses. Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference Tenth Annual Conference, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, April 3–5. Retrieved 9-1-2011 from http://www.mtsu.edu/~itconf.Google Scholar
Ucar, S., and Trundle, K. C. 2011. Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers and Education, 57:1571–1582.Google Scholar
Werhner, M. J. 2010. A Comparison of the Performance of online versus traditional on-campus earth science students on identical exams. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58:310–12.Google Scholar
Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Diest, F., and Stringfellow, E. 2006. Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype. Cedefop Reference series, Number 64. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Wojciechowski, A., and Palmer, L. B. 2005. Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(2). Retrieved 8/1/2011, http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer82/wojciechowski82.htm.Google Scholar
Yacobucci, M. M., Lockwood, R., Tewksbury, B. J., MacFadden, B. J., and Allmon, W. D. 2009. Teaching paleontology in the 21st century: Resources for teaching paleontology at the undergraduate level. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program.Google Scholar