Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:09:06.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nature of the Fossil Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Susan M. Kidwell
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 45469 USA
J. John Sepkoski Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 45469 USA
Get access

Extract

The term “fossil record” is used in two ways: to mean either the totality of fossils preserved in all rocks or the sum of human knowledge of those fossils. In both cases, the term carries the connotation also of the geologic context of the fossils—their distribution in time and space and their relationship to the enclosing rock. One of the primary scientific interests of the fossil record is what it can teach us about the history of life and the processes of large-scale transformation, or evolution, in the forms, diversities, and biological interactions of living things.

Type
Section 2: Organizing the Data
Copyright
Copyright © 1999, 2002 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briggs, D. E. G. 1991. Extraordinary fossils. American Scientist, 79:130141.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1993. Fossil biomolecules. The Biochemists, 15(4):812.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature, 398:415417.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1996. On the probability of ancestors in the fossil record. Paleobiology, 22:141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1981. The titular bishop of Titiopolis. Natural History (May 1981):2024. [On Steno and organic origin of fossils and law of superposition.] Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1983. False premise, good science. Natural History (October 1983):2026. [On Kelvin and calibrating the age of the earth.] Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C. A. G., Smith, A. G., and Walters, R. 1982. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G., and Smith, D. G. 1990. A Geologic Time Scale, 1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Flessa, K. W. 1995. The quality of the fossil record; populations, species, and communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26:269299.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 1990. Interpreting the Stratigraphic Record. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Schwab, F. 1996. Sedimentary Geology, An Introduction to Sedimentary Rocks and Stratigraphy. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Raup, D. R. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology, 2:279288.Google Scholar
Raup, D. R. 1991. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology, 17:3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology, 71:533539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Hulver, M. L. 1985. An atlas of Phanerozoic clade diversity diagrams, p. 1139. In Valentine, J.W. (ed.), Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns, Profiles in Macroevolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Yang, H. 1997. Ancient DNA from Pleistocene fossils: preservation, recovery, and utility of ancient genetic information for Quaternary research. Quaternary Science Reviews, 16:11451161.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1963. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Gulf Coast of the United States. University of Texas Publications, 6304:1373.Google Scholar