Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T20:31:48.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Species richness in the Phanerozoic: an investigation of sampling effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Philip W. Signor III
Philip W. Signor III*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given estimates of the variation in total standing species richness through the periods of the Phanerozoic, mean species duration, and the relative intensity of the sampling of the fauna from each of the periods, the expected number of described species can be predicted for each period of the Phanerozoic using an analytic sampling model. This model is based on the assumption that the relative abundances of species in any geologic period can be approximated by the canonical (lognormal) species-abundance distribution.

Three commonly cited models of standing species richness (Valentine, 1973; Gould et al., 1977; Bambach, 1977) each suggest different patterns of species richness in the Phanerozoic. By assuming that sampling of the fossil record is proportionate to sediment volume, it can be shown with the sampling model that the Empirical, Equilibrium, and Species-Richness Models each predict that the number of described species will be strongly correlated with sediment volume. Equally high correlations are predicted if it is assumed that sampling is proportionate to sediment area or to paleontological interest. The correlations predicted for each of the three models are remarkably similar. The impact of sampling effects is so strong that the variations in species richness postulated by these three models are almost completely obscured. Preservational biases will probably only further obscure the relationship between the number of described species and total species richness. Therefore, it seems likely that analysis of trends in the total number of described species will be of little use in determining trends in worldwide species richness in the Phanerozoic.

Comparison of the actual patterns of variation in the number of described species and the expected numbers of described species predicted by the sampling model reveals that more species are known from the Cenozoic than would be predicted from the abundance of Cenozoic sediments or from the amount of paleontological interest in the Cenozoic. This might have resulted from the Cenozoic sediments remaining relatively free of diagenetic effects which might have destroyed the fossils entombed in the sediments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , Fall 1978 , pp. 394 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bambach, R. K. 1975. What is the pattern of change in species diversity with time? Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. with Programs. 7:987–988.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology. 3:152–167.Google Scholar
Blatt, H. and Jones, R. L. 1975. Proportions of exposed igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86:1085–1088.Google Scholar
Boss, K. J. 1971. Critical estimate of the number of Recent Mollusca. Occ. Pap. Mol. 3:81–135.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. C. 1974. Statistics for Biologists. Second ed.385 pp. Cambridge University Press; London.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1967. The incompleteness of our knowledge of the fossil record. J. Paleontol. 41:559–565.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1969. The fossil record and the origin of the Deuterostomata. North Am. Paleontol. Conv., Chicago, 1969, Proc., H:1104–1132.Google Scholar
Easton, W. H. 1960. Invertebrate Paleontology. 701 pp. Harper and Row; New York.Google Scholar
Feller, W. 1968. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 1. 509 pp. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Raup, D. M. 1975. The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. with Programs. 7:1088.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., Raup, D. M., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Schopf, T. J. M., and Simberloff, D. S. 1977. The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology. 3:23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor, B. 1970. Denudation of the continents. Nature. 228:273–275.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B., eds. 1964. The Phanerozoic Time-Scale. 458 pp. Geol. Soc. London; London.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. St. J. 1971. The pre-Pleistocene Phanerozoic time-scale—a review. Pp. 9–31. In: Harland, W. B. and Francis, E. H., eds. The Phanerozoic Time-Scale, A Supplement (Part 1). Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 5.Google Scholar
May, R. M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. Pp. 81–120. In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M., eds. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. 428 pp. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. and Wolf, L. L. 1970. Dominance and the niche in ecological systems. Science. 167:131–139.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. 1953. Period of existence of some late Cenozoic pelecypods. J. Paleontol. 27:706–707.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. 165 pp. John Wiley & Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Preston, F. W. 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology. 29:254–283.Google Scholar
Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology. 43:185–215, 410–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science. 177:1065–1071.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976a. Taxonomic diversity in the Phanerozoic: A tabulation. Paleobiology. 2:279–288.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976b. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: An interpretation. Paleobiology. 2:289–297.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1977. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: Systematists follow the fossils. Paleobiology. 3:328–329.Google Scholar
Ronov, A. B., Khain, V. Ye., Balukovskiy, A. N., and Seslavinskiy, K. B. 1977. Changes in distribution, volumes and rates of deposition of sedimentary and volcanogenic deposits during the Phanerozoic (within the present continents). Internat. Geol. Rev. 19:1297–1304.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: Species-area effects. Paleobiology. 2:298–303.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. 1977. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: A reflection of labor by systematists? Paleobiology. 3:325–328.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1952. How many species? Evolution. 6:342.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 72:646–650.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. H. 1977. Was development of brackish oceans a factor in Permian extinctions? Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88:133–138.Google Scholar
Teichert, C. 1957. How many fossil species? J. Paleontol. 31:967–969.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1970. How many marine invertebrate fossil species? A new approximation. J. Paleontol. 44:410–415.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1972. Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity: A test of two alternate models. Science. 180:1078–1079.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Marine Biosphere. 511 pp. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Foin, T. C., and Peart, D. 1978. A provincial model of Phanerozoic marine diversity. Paleobiology. 4:55–66.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. Second ed.385 pp. MacMillan; New York.Google Scholar