Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T21:41:29.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preserved ligament in a radiolitid rudist bivalve and its implication of mantle marginal feeding in the group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Peter W. Skelton
Peter W. Skelton*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, E206 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fibrous ligament and aragonitic shell material have been found preserved in two specimens of radiolitid rudists [cf. Radiolites angeoides (De Lapeirouse)] from the Lower to Middle Coniacian of Tirol, Austria. The invaginated ligament apparently comprised two torn and overgrown non-functional strings, one in each valve, connected medially by a thin strip of active ligament. The original dimensions of the active ligament have been estimated, for shells of 4 to 5 cm commissural diameter, at 0.58 mm2 cross-sectional area and 1.3 mm length, with the shell closed. Using data on the adductor muscle of Recent oysters and the results of compression tests carried out on samples of oyster fibrous ligament, it is estimated that these radiolitid shells opened less than 1 mm in life; their gaping was highly restricted. This is taken to support the proposal that the expanded mantle margins (principally that of the right, attached valve) were responsible for food particle entrapment, rather than the gills as in most other bivalves. It is suggested that a tentaculate mantle flange was extruded through the narrow gap between the valves during feeding. The pair of pronounced radial bands on the posterior flanks of the shell are interpreted as marking pseudofaecal and faecal ejection sites. Finally, it is speculated that slime (possibly poisonous or foul-tasting) on the mantle tentacles inhibited predators.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Spring 1979 , pp. 90 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anthony, R. 1924. Étude d'un moule interne artificel complet d'Hippurites radiosus Desm. Archs. Zool. Exp. Gén. 62:327–344.Google Scholar
Bevelander, G. and Nakahara, H. 1969. An electron microscope study of the formation of the ligament of Mytilus edulis and Pinctada radiata. Calc. Tiss. Res. 4:101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1956. Thyrastylon, a new rudist genus from the Upper Cretaceous of Guatemala, the Antilles, and Persia, with a discussion of the functions of rudist oscules and pillars. Palaeontogr. Am. 4:31–48.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1971. Rudists of Jamaica. Palaeontogr. Am. 7:162–257.Google Scholar
Dechaseaux, C. 1947. Bandes siphonales, piliers et siphons des rudistes. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr. 5(17):425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechaseaux, C. and Coogan, A. H. 1969. Family Radiolitidae Gray, 1848. Pp. N803–N817. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (N) Mollusca 6(2). Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kans. Press; Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1886. Essai sur la morphologie des rudistes. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr. 3(15):389–404.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1902. Classification des Radiolites. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr. 4(2):461–477.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1910. Études sur les Rudistes: Rudistes de Sicile, d'Algérie, d'Égypte, du Liban et de la Perse. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. Paléont. No. 41:1–84.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S. 1964. The American Oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 64:1–480.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, R. N., Marszalek, D. S., and Schneidermann, N. 1971. Ultrastructure of carbonate cements in a Holocene algal reef of Bermuda. J. Sed. Petrol. 41:472–482.Google Scholar
Herm, D. 1976. Sedimentationszyklen und Extrembiotope im Gosau-Becken von Brandenberg/Tirol. Zbl. Geol. Paläontol. 2(5/6):439–442, 481-494.Google Scholar
Hoyle, G. 1964. Muscle and neuromuscular physiology. Pp. 313–351. In: Wilbur, K. M. and Yonge, C. M., eds. Physiology of the Mollusca. Volume I. Academic Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, C. B. 1966. Biology of Suspension Feeding. 358 pp. Pergamon Press; Oxford, England.Google Scholar
Karacabey-Öztemür, N. 1976. Un nouveau genre de Radiolitidae: Darendeella N. Gen. Bull. Miner. Res. and Explor. Inst. of Turkey (Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü). 86:69–76.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. and Sohl, N. F. 1974. Structure and evolution of Antillean Cretaceous rudist frameworks. Verh. Naturforsch. Ges. Basel. 84(1):399–467.Google Scholar
Perkins, B. F. 1969. Rudist morphology. Pp. N751–N764. In: Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (N) Mollusca 6(2). Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kansas Press; Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Philip, J. 1972. Paléoécologie des formations á Rudistes du Crétacé Supérieur: l'exemple du sud-est de la France. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 12:205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell Hunter, W. and Grant, D. C. 1962. Mechanics of the ligament in the bivalve Spisula solidissima in relation to mode of life. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods Hole. 122:369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, P. W. 1974. Aragonitic shell structures in the rudist Biradiolites, and some paleobiological inferences. Géologie Méditerranéenne. 1(2):63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, P. W. 1976. Functional morphology of the Hippuritidae. Lethaia. 9:83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, P. W. 1978. The evolution of functional design in rudists (Hippuritacea) and its taxonomic implications. In: Yonge, C. M. and Thompson, T. E. eds. Evolutionary Systematics of Bivalve Molluscs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 284:305–318.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D., Kennedy, W. J., and Hall, A. 1969. The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction. Nuculacea-Trigonacea. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (zool.). Suppl. 3:1–125.Google Scholar
Toucas, A. 1907-1909. Études sur la classification et l'évolution des Radiolitidés. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. Paléontol. No. 36:1–132.Google Scholar
Trueman, E. R. 1951. The structure, development, and operation of the hinge ligament of Ostrea edulis. Q. J. microsc. Sci. 92:129–140.Google Scholar
Vogel, K. 1970. Die Radioliten-Gattung Osculigera Kühn (höhere Oberkreide) und die Funktion kennzeichnender morphologischer Eigenschaften der Rudisten. Paläontol. Z. 44:63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, K. 1975. Endosymbiotic algae in rudists? Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 17:327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1967. Form, habit and evolution in the Chamidae (Bivalvia) with reference to conditions in the rudists (Hippuritacea). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 252(B. 775):49–105.Google Scholar