Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:54:51.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periodicity of chamber formation in chambered cephalopods: evidence from Nautilus macromphalus and Nautilus pompilius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Peter Douglas Ward
Peter Douglas Ward*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth rates of ammonites and extinct nautiloids have been estimated in two ways: through analyses of shell growth lines and by analyzing the patterns of oxygen isotopic values from successive septa. In both types of studies, it has been assumed that the amount of time between successive chamber formation events is approximately constant. This assumption has never been tested with living cephalopods, however. To examine this, 10 immature Nautilus pompilius and two immature N. macromphalus were maintained in a surface aquarium for a period of 1 yr and periodically radiographed. The radiographs allowed direct observation of chamber formation events and apertural shell growth. During this observational period 61 separate chamber formation events were observed in the nautiluses. The time between separate chamber formation events increased in successively produced chambers, and varied from a minimum of 2–3 wk in a specimen of 45-mm shell diameter to a maximum of 13–15 wk in a specimen of 132-mm shell diameter. Unlike interval of chamber formation, which increased during ontogeny, rate of apertural shell growth showed no observable rate increase or decrease during ontogeny prior to maturity. With the onset of maturity, as marked by the shell characteristics defined by Collins et al. (1980), apertural shell growth rates dropped markedly, and ceased coincident with the removal of the last volumes of cameral liquid in the last formed, approximated chamber. Both rate of apertural shell growth and septal spacing were affected by degree of shell breakage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Fall 1985 , pp. 438 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chamberlain, J. 1978. Permeability of the siphuncular tube of Nautilus: its ecologic and paleoecologic implications. N. Jb. Geol. Paleontol. 3:129–142.Google Scholar
Cochran, J. and Landman, N. 1984. Radiometric determination of the growth rate of Nautilus in nature. Nature. 308:725–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D., Ward, P., and Westermann, G. 1980. Function of cameral water in Nautilus. Paleobiology. 6(2):168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, R. 1982. The mode and tempo of cameral deposit formation: evidence of orthoconic nautiloid physiology and ecology. Proc. N. Am. Paleontol. Conv. 1:113–118.Google Scholar
Davis, R. and Mohorter, W. 1973. Juvenile Nautilus from the Fiji Islands. J. Paleontol. 47:925–928.Google Scholar
Denton, E. and Gilpin-Brown, J. 1966. On the buoyancy of the Pearly Nautilus. J. Mar. Biol. Assn. U.K. 46:723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doguzhaeva, L. 1982. Rhythms of ammonoid shell secretion. Lethaia. 15:385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, R. 1984. Growth analysis of Silurian orthoconic nautiloids. Paleontology. 27:671–677.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. and Hurst, J. 1983. Aspects of the ecology of actinocerid cephalopods. N. Jb. Geol. Palaeontol. Abh. 165:362–377.Google Scholar
Hughes, W. 1981. Shell ornamentation in fossil nautiloids: a problem for Earth-Moon dynamics. Geol. Soc. Am. Abst. Prog. 13:477.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. and Stahl, W. 1971. Isotopische Palaotemperatubestimmungen an jurassischen Ammoniten und grundsatzliche Voraussetzungen fur diese Method. Geol. Jb. 89:33–62.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. and Pompea, S. 1978. Nautiloid growth rhythms and dynamical evolution of the Earth-Moon system. Nature. 275:606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, N. 1983. Ammonoid growth rhythms. Lethaia. 16:248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., Catala Stucki, I., and Ward, P. 1978. The growth rate and reproductive behavior of Nautilus macromphalus. N. Jb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 156:207–225.Google Scholar
Meenakshi, V., Martin, A., and Wilbur, K. 1974. Shell repair in Nautilus macromphalus. Mar. Biol. 27:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, A. 1972. Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol. Rev. 47:241–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, B. 1983. Natural rates of growth and longevity of Nautilus belauensis. Paleobiology. 9:280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. 1982. The relationship of siphuncle size to emptying rates in chambered cephalopods: implications for cephalopod paleobiology. Paleobiology. 8:426–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. 1983. Nautilus macromphalus. Pp. 11–28. In: Boyle, P., ed. Cephalopod Life Cycles. Vol. 1. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Ward, P. and Chamberlain, J. 1983. Radiographic observation of chamber formation in Nautilus pompilius. Nature. 304:57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P., Greenwald, L., and Magnier, Y. 1981. The chamber formation cycle in Nautilus macromphalus. Paleobiology. 7:481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic ammonoids. Life Sci. Contr. R. Ontario Mus. 78:1–19.Google Scholar