Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T17:09:02.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paleobiologic significance of fossulae in North American Late Ordovician solitary rugose corals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Robert J. Elias*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

Three features that provide information on the paleobiologic significance of fossulae in North American Late Ordovician solitary rugose corals are (1) irregularities in shape and position of the outer wall, (2) discontiguous septal growth lamellae, and (3) foreign objects incorporated into interseptal chambers within the corallum. Outer wall irregularities indicate that portions of a polyp could detach from the calice and could contract and expand radially by a significant amount and for prolonged periods of time during ontogeny, especially in the vicinity of the alar and cardinal fossulae. Discontiguous lamellae indicate that the polyp could detach from septa and contract laterally, especially in the cardinal fossula. This began with the onset of maturity and probably reflects reproductive activity. Ostracodes are the most common foreign objects in these coralla and are usually situated within or near the cardinal and alar fossulae. In the most likely hypothesis accounting for their presence, a live ostracode entered the calice when one side of the polyp temporarily detached from the corallum and contracted radially. It became trapped upon expansion and reattachment of the soft parts. The polyp moved upward in its corallum by detachment and uplift of the aboral surface. In a less likely hypothesis, the ostracode was captured by the coral for food and came to rest on the floor of the central cavity. It was incorporated into an interseptal chamber when the polyp moved upward in its corallum by atrophy of the aboral surface and formation of a new base above the object. In either hypothesis, portions of the polyp in the cardinal and alar fossulae probably functioned throughout ontogeny for water circulation in the central cavity, and for the intake of food and/or ejection of undigested material through the mouth. Taxonomic, stratigraphic, and paleobiogeographic variability in frequencies of the three features may indicate differences in the necessity and/or ability of polyps to perform these functions involving the fossulae. This could be a reflection of environmental and/or genetic factors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cheng, Y. M. 1969. Über einen Goniatiten-Fund in einer devonischen Koralle. Münster. Forsch. Geol. Paläontol. 14:4956.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, B. I. 1930. Sluchai nachozdenia inorodnogo tela vo vnutrennei polosti koralla. Soc. Paléontol. Russie, Annu. 8:148149.Google Scholar
Dubatolov, V. N. 1961. O regeneratsii i paleozoiskikh korallov. Paleontol. Zhur. 1961:7581.Google Scholar
Elias, R. J. 1981. Solitary rugose corals of the Selkirk Member, Red River Formation (late Middle or Upper Ordovician), southern Manitoba. 53 pp. Geol. Surv. Can., Bull. 344.Google Scholar
Elias, R. J. 1982a. Latest Ordovician solitary rugose corals of eastern North America. 116 pp. Bull. Am. Paleontol. 81(314).Google Scholar
Elias, R. J. 1982b. Paleoecology and biostratinomy of solitary rugose corals in the Stony Mountain Formation (Upper Ordovician), Stony Mountain, Manitoba. Can. J. Earth Sci. 19:15821598.Google Scholar
Elias, R. J. 1983. Late Ordovician solitary rugose corals of the Stony Mountain Formation, southern Manitoba, and its equivalents. J. Paleontol. 57:924956.Google Scholar
Flügel, H. W. 1975. Skelettentwicklung, Ontogenie und Funktionsmorphologie rugoser Korallen. Paläontol. Z. 49:407431.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1981. Part F, Coelenterata: Supplement 1, Rugosa and Tabulata. Vol. 1, pp. 1378, and vol. 2, pp. 379–762. In: Teichert, C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kansas; Boulder, Colo., and Lawrence, Kans.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1975. A gastropod enclosed in a skeleton of a Devonian rugose coral. J. Paleontol. 49:153159.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1969. The formation of dissepiments in zoantharian corals. Pp. 1726. In: Campbell, K. S. W., ed. Stratigraphy and Palaeontology; Essays in Honour of Dorothy Hill. Australian Natl. Univ. Press; Canberra.Google Scholar
Weyer, D. 1972. Zur Morphologie der Rugosa (Pterocorallia). Geologie. 21:710737.Google Scholar